Hand transplants and bodily integrity

Jenny Slatman, Guy Widdershoven

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In this article, we present an analysis of bodily integrity in hand transplants from a phenomenological narrative perspective, while drawing on two contrasting case stories. We consider bodily integrity as the subjective bodily experience of wholeness which, instead of referring to actual bodily intactness, involves a positive identification with one's physical body. Bodily mutilations, such as the loss of a hand, may severely affect one's bodily integrity. A possible restoration of one's experience of wholeness requires a process of re-identification. Medical interventions, such as a hand transplant, may improve the possibility of a successful re-identification. However, since the experience of wholeness does not refer simply to physical intactness or impairment, the choice for medical intervention should not be based merely upon the degree of physical mutilation. It should also be based upon the degree to which a person fails in re-identifying with his or her mutilated body. We argue that a normalizing operation is only ethically justifiable if the intervention enables the person to be the body he or she has.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Right to Bodily Integrity
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages393-416
ISBN (Electronic)9781315237367
ISBN (Print)9781409466079
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Publication series

NameThe Right to Bodily Integrity

Cite this

Slatman, J., & Widdershoven, G. (2017). Hand transplants and bodily integrity. In The Right to Bodily Integrity (pp. 393-416). (The Right to Bodily Integrity). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237367
Slatman, Jenny ; Widdershoven, Guy. / Hand transplants and bodily integrity. The Right to Bodily Integrity. Taylor and Francis, 2017. pp. 393-416 (The Right to Bodily Integrity).
@inbook{3b97ac30252b46e6a09255affba00058,
title = "Hand transplants and bodily integrity",
abstract = "In this article, we present an analysis of bodily integrity in hand transplants from a phenomenological narrative perspective, while drawing on two contrasting case stories. We consider bodily integrity as the subjective bodily experience of wholeness which, instead of referring to actual bodily intactness, involves a positive identification with one's physical body. Bodily mutilations, such as the loss of a hand, may severely affect one's bodily integrity. A possible restoration of one's experience of wholeness requires a process of re-identification. Medical interventions, such as a hand transplant, may improve the possibility of a successful re-identification. However, since the experience of wholeness does not refer simply to physical intactness or impairment, the choice for medical intervention should not be based merely upon the degree of physical mutilation. It should also be based upon the degree to which a person fails in re-identifying with his or her mutilated body. We argue that a normalizing operation is only ethically justifiable if the intervention enables the person to be the body he or she has.",
author = "Jenny Slatman and Guy Widdershoven",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.4324/9781315237367",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781409466079",
series = "The Right to Bodily Integrity",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
pages = "393--416",
booktitle = "The Right to Bodily Integrity",
address = "United States",

}

Slatman, J & Widdershoven, G 2017, Hand transplants and bodily integrity. in The Right to Bodily Integrity. The Right to Bodily Integrity, Taylor and Francis, pp. 393-416. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237367

Hand transplants and bodily integrity. / Slatman, Jenny; Widdershoven, Guy.

The Right to Bodily Integrity. Taylor and Francis, 2017. p. 393-416 (The Right to Bodily Integrity).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterAcademicpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Hand transplants and bodily integrity

AU - Slatman, Jenny

AU - Widdershoven, Guy

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - In this article, we present an analysis of bodily integrity in hand transplants from a phenomenological narrative perspective, while drawing on two contrasting case stories. We consider bodily integrity as the subjective bodily experience of wholeness which, instead of referring to actual bodily intactness, involves a positive identification with one's physical body. Bodily mutilations, such as the loss of a hand, may severely affect one's bodily integrity. A possible restoration of one's experience of wholeness requires a process of re-identification. Medical interventions, such as a hand transplant, may improve the possibility of a successful re-identification. However, since the experience of wholeness does not refer simply to physical intactness or impairment, the choice for medical intervention should not be based merely upon the degree of physical mutilation. It should also be based upon the degree to which a person fails in re-identifying with his or her mutilated body. We argue that a normalizing operation is only ethically justifiable if the intervention enables the person to be the body he or she has.

AB - In this article, we present an analysis of bodily integrity in hand transplants from a phenomenological narrative perspective, while drawing on two contrasting case stories. We consider bodily integrity as the subjective bodily experience of wholeness which, instead of referring to actual bodily intactness, involves a positive identification with one's physical body. Bodily mutilations, such as the loss of a hand, may severely affect one's bodily integrity. A possible restoration of one's experience of wholeness requires a process of re-identification. Medical interventions, such as a hand transplant, may improve the possibility of a successful re-identification. However, since the experience of wholeness does not refer simply to physical intactness or impairment, the choice for medical intervention should not be based merely upon the degree of physical mutilation. It should also be based upon the degree to which a person fails in re-identifying with his or her mutilated body. We argue that a normalizing operation is only ethically justifiable if the intervention enables the person to be the body he or she has.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063189137&origin=inward

U2 - 10.4324/9781315237367

DO - 10.4324/9781315237367

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781409466079

T3 - The Right to Bodily Integrity

SP - 393

EP - 416

BT - The Right to Bodily Integrity

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -

Slatman J, Widdershoven G. Hand transplants and bodily integrity. In The Right to Bodily Integrity. Taylor and Francis. 2017. p. 393-416. (The Right to Bodily Integrity). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237367