Handover Structure and Quality in the Acute Medical Assessment Unit: A Prospective Observational Study

Ineke van der Wulp, Else P Poot, Prabath W B Nanayakkara, Stephan A Loer, Cordula Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Inadequate patient handovers are associated with the occurrence of medical errors. The objective of the present study was to explore the structure and quality of handovers in the acute medical assessment unit. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Handover structure was observed by ordering handover information according to the elements of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation, and Read back (SBAR-R) handover tool. Handover quality was measured by means of a questionnaire, i.e., the rating tool for handover quality, and by assessing situation awareness of the degree to which professionals after a handover agreed on the complexity of the patient's care needs. Results A total of 71 handovers were observed. In most handovers, different elements of the SBAR-R were used frequently (median, 7.5 elements; range, 2.0-15.0). On the quality of handovers, 109 respondents (44.1%) completed the questionnaire. On a 0-to-100 scale, median scores on information transfer were 67.9 (interquartile range [IQR],17.9), 75.0 (IQR, 25.0) on shared understanding, and 75.0 (IQR, 16.7) on working atmosphere. Agreement in situation awareness was 70.0%. Conclusions Handovers in the acute medical assessment unit were poorly structured; however, the perceived quality of handovers was substantial. Implementing the SBAR-R may be an effective strategy to improve handover practice and situation awareness, although further study to its applicability in acute medical assessment units is necessary.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-229
JournalJournal of Patient Safety
Volume15
Issue number3
Early online date4 Nov 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2019

Cite this

@article{8d8e613fc1bc423d8c79f090747919d5,
title = "Handover Structure and Quality in the Acute Medical Assessment Unit: A Prospective Observational Study",
abstract = "Objectives Inadequate patient handovers are associated with the occurrence of medical errors. The objective of the present study was to explore the structure and quality of handovers in the acute medical assessment unit. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Handover structure was observed by ordering handover information according to the elements of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation, and Read back (SBAR-R) handover tool. Handover quality was measured by means of a questionnaire, i.e., the rating tool for handover quality, and by assessing situation awareness of the degree to which professionals after a handover agreed on the complexity of the patient's care needs. Results A total of 71 handovers were observed. In most handovers, different elements of the SBAR-R were used frequently (median, 7.5 elements; range, 2.0-15.0). On the quality of handovers, 109 respondents (44.1{\%}) completed the questionnaire. On a 0-to-100 scale, median scores on information transfer were 67.9 (interquartile range [IQR],17.9), 75.0 (IQR, 25.0) on shared understanding, and 75.0 (IQR, 16.7) on working atmosphere. Agreement in situation awareness was 70.0{\%}. Conclusions Handovers in the acute medical assessment unit were poorly structured; however, the perceived quality of handovers was substantial. Implementing the SBAR-R may be an effective strategy to improve handover practice and situation awareness, although further study to its applicability in acute medical assessment units is necessary.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "{van der Wulp}, Ineke and Poot, {Else P} and Nanayakkara, {Prabath W B} and Loer, {Stephan A} and Cordula Wagner",
year = "2019",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PTS.0000000000000221",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "224--229",
journal = "Journal of Patient Safety",
issn = "1549-8417",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Handover Structure and Quality in the Acute Medical Assessment Unit : A Prospective Observational Study. / van der Wulp, Ineke; Poot, Else P; Nanayakkara, Prabath W B; Loer, Stephan A; Wagner, Cordula.

In: Journal of Patient Safety, Vol. 15, No. 3, 01.09.2019, p. 224-229.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Handover Structure and Quality in the Acute Medical Assessment Unit

T2 - A Prospective Observational Study

AU - van der Wulp, Ineke

AU - Poot, Else P

AU - Nanayakkara, Prabath W B

AU - Loer, Stephan A

AU - Wagner, Cordula

PY - 2019/9/1

Y1 - 2019/9/1

N2 - Objectives Inadequate patient handovers are associated with the occurrence of medical errors. The objective of the present study was to explore the structure and quality of handovers in the acute medical assessment unit. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Handover structure was observed by ordering handover information according to the elements of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation, and Read back (SBAR-R) handover tool. Handover quality was measured by means of a questionnaire, i.e., the rating tool for handover quality, and by assessing situation awareness of the degree to which professionals after a handover agreed on the complexity of the patient's care needs. Results A total of 71 handovers were observed. In most handovers, different elements of the SBAR-R were used frequently (median, 7.5 elements; range, 2.0-15.0). On the quality of handovers, 109 respondents (44.1%) completed the questionnaire. On a 0-to-100 scale, median scores on information transfer were 67.9 (interquartile range [IQR],17.9), 75.0 (IQR, 25.0) on shared understanding, and 75.0 (IQR, 16.7) on working atmosphere. Agreement in situation awareness was 70.0%. Conclusions Handovers in the acute medical assessment unit were poorly structured; however, the perceived quality of handovers was substantial. Implementing the SBAR-R may be an effective strategy to improve handover practice and situation awareness, although further study to its applicability in acute medical assessment units is necessary.

AB - Objectives Inadequate patient handovers are associated with the occurrence of medical errors. The objective of the present study was to explore the structure and quality of handovers in the acute medical assessment unit. Methods A prospective observational study was conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Handover structure was observed by ordering handover information according to the elements of the Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation, and Read back (SBAR-R) handover tool. Handover quality was measured by means of a questionnaire, i.e., the rating tool for handover quality, and by assessing situation awareness of the degree to which professionals after a handover agreed on the complexity of the patient's care needs. Results A total of 71 handovers were observed. In most handovers, different elements of the SBAR-R were used frequently (median, 7.5 elements; range, 2.0-15.0). On the quality of handovers, 109 respondents (44.1%) completed the questionnaire. On a 0-to-100 scale, median scores on information transfer were 67.9 (interquartile range [IQR],17.9), 75.0 (IQR, 25.0) on shared understanding, and 75.0 (IQR, 16.7) on working atmosphere. Agreement in situation awareness was 70.0%. Conclusions Handovers in the acute medical assessment unit were poorly structured; however, the perceived quality of handovers was substantial. Implementing the SBAR-R may be an effective strategy to improve handover practice and situation awareness, although further study to its applicability in acute medical assessment units is necessary.

KW - Journal Article

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85071434105&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29112022

U2 - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000221

DO - 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000221

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 224

EP - 229

JO - Journal of Patient Safety

JF - Journal of Patient Safety

SN - 1549-8417

IS - 3

ER -