TY - JOUR
T1 - Heterogeneity of associations between total and types of fish intake and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: Federated meta-analysis of 28 prospective studies including 956,122 participants
AU - Pastorino, Silvia
AU - Bishop, Tom
AU - Sharp, Stephen J.
AU - Pearce, Matthew
AU - Akbaraly, Tasnime
AU - Barbieri, Natalia B.
AU - Bes-Rastrollo, Maira
AU - Beulens, Joline W. J.
AU - Chen, Zhengming
AU - du, Huaidong
AU - Duncan, Bruce B.
AU - Goto, Atsushi
AU - Härkänen, Tommi
AU - Hashemian, Maryam
AU - Kromhout, Daan
AU - Järvinen, Ritva
AU - Kivimaki, Mika
AU - Knekt, Paul
AU - Lin, Xu
AU - Lund, Eiliv
AU - Magliano, Dianna J.
AU - Malekzadeh, Reza
AU - Martínez-González, Miguel Ángel
AU - O’donoghue, Gráinne
AU - O’gorman, Donal
AU - Poustchi, Hossein
AU - Rylander, Charlotta
AU - Sawada, Norie
AU - Shaw, Jonathan E.
AU - Schmidt, Maria
AU - Soedamah-Muthu, Sabita S.
AU - Sun, Liang
AU - Wen, Wanqing
AU - Wolk, Alicja
AU - Shu, Xiao-Ou
AU - Zheng, Wei
AU - Wareham, Nicholas J.
AU - Forouhi, Nita G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4/1
Y1 - 2021/4/1
N2 - The association between fish consumption and new-onset type 2 diabetes is inconsistent and differs according to geographical location. We examined the association between the total and types of fish consumption and type 2 diabetes using individual participant data from 28 prospective cohort studies from the Americas (6), Europe (15), the Western Pacific (6), and the Eastern Mediterranean (1) comprising 956,122 participants and 48,084 cases of incident type 2 diabetes. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for associations of total fish, shellfish, fatty, lean, fried, freshwater, and saltwater fish intake and type 2 diabetes were derived for each study, adjusting for a consistent set of con-founders and combined across studies using random-effects meta-analysis. We stratified all analyses by sex due to observed interaction (p = 0.002) on the association between fish and type 2 diabe-tes. In women, for each 100 g/week higher intake the IRRs (95% CIs) of type 2 diabetes were 1.02 (1.01–1.03, I2 = 61%) for total fish, 1.04 (1.01–1.07, I2 = 46%) for fatty fish, and 1.02 (1.00–1.04, I2 = 33%) for lean fish. In men, all associations were null. In women, we observed variation by geographical location: IRRs for total fish were 1.03 (1.02–1.04, I2 = 0%) in the Americas and null in other regions. In conclusion, we found evidence of a neutral association between total fish intake and type 2 diabetes in men, but there was a modest positive association among women with heterogeneity across studies, which was partly explained by geographical location and types of fish intake. Future research should investigate the role of cooking methods, accompanying foods and environmental pol-lutants, but meanwhile, existing dietary regional, national, or international guidelines should con-tinue to guide fish consumption within overall healthy dietary patterns.
AB - The association between fish consumption and new-onset type 2 diabetes is inconsistent and differs according to geographical location. We examined the association between the total and types of fish consumption and type 2 diabetes using individual participant data from 28 prospective cohort studies from the Americas (6), Europe (15), the Western Pacific (6), and the Eastern Mediterranean (1) comprising 956,122 participants and 48,084 cases of incident type 2 diabetes. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) for associations of total fish, shellfish, fatty, lean, fried, freshwater, and saltwater fish intake and type 2 diabetes were derived for each study, adjusting for a consistent set of con-founders and combined across studies using random-effects meta-analysis. We stratified all analyses by sex due to observed interaction (p = 0.002) on the association between fish and type 2 diabe-tes. In women, for each 100 g/week higher intake the IRRs (95% CIs) of type 2 diabetes were 1.02 (1.01–1.03, I2 = 61%) for total fish, 1.04 (1.01–1.07, I2 = 46%) for fatty fish, and 1.02 (1.00–1.04, I2 = 33%) for lean fish. In men, all associations were null. In women, we observed variation by geographical location: IRRs for total fish were 1.03 (1.02–1.04, I2 = 0%) in the Americas and null in other regions. In conclusion, we found evidence of a neutral association between total fish intake and type 2 diabetes in men, but there was a modest positive association among women with heterogeneity across studies, which was partly explained by geographical location and types of fish intake. Future research should investigate the role of cooking methods, accompanying foods and environmental pol-lutants, but meanwhile, existing dietary regional, national, or international guidelines should con-tinue to guide fish consumption within overall healthy dietary patterns.
KW - Federated meta-analysis
KW - Fish
KW - Prospective studies
KW - Type 2 diabetes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103542316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/nu13041223
DO - 10.3390/nu13041223
M3 - Article
C2 - 33917229
VL - 13
JO - Nutrients
JF - Nutrients
SN - 2072-6643
IS - 4
M1 - 1223
ER -