Hospital volume and beyond first-line palliative systemic treatment in metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma: A population-based study

Willemieke P. M. Dijksterhuis, Rob H. A. Verhoeven, Marieke Pape, Marije Slingerland, Nadia Haj Mohammad, Judith de Vos-Geelen, Laurens V. Beerepoot, Theo van Voorthuizen, Geert-Jan Creemers, Valery E. P. P. Lemmens, Martijn G. H. van Oijen, Hanneke W. M. van Laarhoven*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Beyond first-line palliative systemic treatment can be beneficial to selected oesophagogastric cancer patients, but experience with its administration may be limited and vary among hospitals. In a population-based study, we analysed the association between hospital systemic treatment volume and administration of beyond first-line treatment in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma, as well as the effect on overall survival (OS). Methods: Synchronous metastatic oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma patients (2010–2017) were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Hospitals were categorised in volumes quartiles. The association between hospital systemic treatment volume and the use of beyond first-line treatment was assessed using trend and multivariable logistic regression analyses. OS was compared between hospitals with high and low beyond first-line treatment administration and treatment strategies using Kaplan–Meier curves with log-rank test and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression. Results: Beyond first-line treatment was administered in 606 of 2,466 patients who received first-line treatment, and increased from 20% to 31% between 2010 and 2017 (P < 0.001). The lowest hospital volumes were independently associated with lower beyond first-line treatment administration compared to the highest volume (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39–0.99; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48–0.95). Median OS was higher in all patients treated in hospitals with a high versus low beyond first-line treatment administration (7.9 versus 6.2 months, P < 0.001). Second-line paclitaxel/ramucirumab was administered most frequently and independently associated with longer OS compared to taxane monotherapy (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59–0.92). Conclusion: Higher hospital volume was associated with increased beyond first-line treatment administration in oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma. Second-line paclitaxel/ramucirumab resulted in longer survival compared to taxane monotherapy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)107-118
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
Volume139
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2020

Cite this