How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour? A protocol for a systematic review

Corine J. Verhoeven, Dale Spence, Viola Nyman, René H. J. Otten, Maria Healy

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Midwives' practices during the second stage of labour vary nationally and internationally. We aim to retrieve evidence that supports high-quality intrapartum care by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care Database (through MIDIRS), and The Cochrane Library will be searched to identify studies that meet the inclusion criteria. No language or publication date constraints will be applied. Articles that pass the two-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched. Discussion: A midwife's practice can be influenced by education and cultural practices but ultimately it should be informed by up-to-date research evidence. By analysing and synthesising the results of the studies, this systematic review will provide valuable insight into high-quality evidence-based midwifery care, which can inform practice, education and future research. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018088300
Original languageEnglish
Article number0916
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{52f8dbf542a3459f876329d6a8544632,
title = "How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour?: A protocol for a systematic review",
abstract = "Background: Midwives' practices during the second stage of labour vary nationally and internationally. We aim to retrieve evidence that supports high-quality intrapartum care by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care Database (through MIDIRS), and The Cochrane Library will be searched to identify studies that meet the inclusion criteria. No language or publication date constraints will be applied. Articles that pass the two-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched. Discussion: A midwife's practice can be influenced by education and cultural practices but ultimately it should be informed by up-to-date research evidence. By analysing and synthesising the results of the studies, this systematic review will provide valuable insight into high-quality evidence-based midwifery care, which can inform practice, education and future research. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018088300",
author = "Verhoeven, {Corine J.} and Dale Spence and Viola Nyman and Otten, {Ren{\'e} H. J.} and Maria Healy",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1186/s13643-018-0916-1",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
journal = "Systematic Reviews",
issn = "2046-4053",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour? A protocol for a systematic review. / Verhoeven, Corine J.; Spence, Dale; Nyman, Viola; Otten, René H. J.; Healy, Maria.

In: Systematic Reviews, Vol. 8, No. 1, 0916, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do midwives facilitate women to give birth during physiological second stage of labour?

T2 - A protocol for a systematic review

AU - Verhoeven, Corine J.

AU - Spence, Dale

AU - Nyman, Viola

AU - Otten, René H. J.

AU - Healy, Maria

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Midwives' practices during the second stage of labour vary nationally and internationally. We aim to retrieve evidence that supports high-quality intrapartum care by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care Database (through MIDIRS), and The Cochrane Library will be searched to identify studies that meet the inclusion criteria. No language or publication date constraints will be applied. Articles that pass the two-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched. Discussion: A midwife's practice can be influenced by education and cultural practices but ultimately it should be informed by up-to-date research evidence. By analysing and synthesising the results of the studies, this systematic review will provide valuable insight into high-quality evidence-based midwifery care, which can inform practice, education and future research. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018088300

AB - Background: Midwives' practices during the second stage of labour vary nationally and internationally. We aim to retrieve evidence that supports high-quality intrapartum care by conducting a systematic review of the literature. Methods: Electronic bibliographic databases including PubMed, EMBASE.com, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PsycINFO, Maternity and Infant Care Database (through MIDIRS), and The Cochrane Library will be searched to identify studies that meet the inclusion criteria. No language or publication date constraints will be applied. Articles that pass the two-stage screening process will then be assessed for risk of bias and have their reference lists hand searched. Discussion: A midwife's practice can be influenced by education and cultural practices but ultimately it should be informed by up-to-date research evidence. By analysing and synthesising the results of the studies, this systematic review will provide valuable insight into high-quality evidence-based midwifery care, which can inform practice, education and future research. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018088300

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059502096&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30606256

U2 - 10.1186/s13643-018-0916-1

DO - 10.1186/s13643-018-0916-1

M3 - Review article

VL - 8

JO - Systematic Reviews

JF - Systematic Reviews

SN - 2046-4053

IS - 1

M1 - 0916

ER -