Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry

Maarten A. van Schijndel, Petra J. Caarls, Jeroen D. H. van Wijngaarden, André I. Wierdsma, Jeroen G. Lijmer, Annette D. Boenink, Witte J. G. Hoogendijk, Jeroen A. van Waarde, Jan J. V. Busschbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: To define generic quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry from the perspectives of patients, professionals (physicians, nurses, and managers), and payers (health insurance companies). Methods: Quality variables were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. A working. group consisting of patients', professionals' and payers' representatives was mandated by their respective umbrella organizations. The working group prioritized the quality variables that were identified. Core values were defined and subsequently linked to preliminary quality indicators. These were tested for feasibility in ten hospitals in a four-week period. Stakeholder consultation took place by means of two invitational conferences and two written commentary rounds. Results: Forty-one quality variables were identified from the literature. After prioritization, seven core values were defined and translated to 22 preliminary indicators. Overall, the feasibility study showed high relevance scores and good implementability of the preliminary quality indicators. A final set of twenty-two quality indicators (17 structure, 3 process and 2 outcome indicators) was then established using a consensus-based approach. Conclusion: Consensus on a quality framework for general hospital psychiatry was built by incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders. Results of the feasibility study suggest broad support and good implementability of the final quality indicators. Structural indicators were broadly defined, and process and outcome indicators are generic to facilitate quality measurement across settings. The quality indicator set can now be used to facilitate quality and outcome assessment, stimulate standardization of services, and help demonstrate (cost-) effectiveness.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)27-37
JournalGeneral Hospital Psychiatry
Volume55
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

van Schijndel, M. A., Caarls, P. J., van Wijngaarden, J. D. H., Wierdsma, A. I., Lijmer, J. G., Boenink, A. D., ... Busschbach, J. J. V. (2018). Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry. General Hospital Psychiatry, 55, 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.009
van Schijndel, Maarten A. ; Caarls, Petra J. ; van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H. ; Wierdsma, André I. ; Lijmer, Jeroen G. ; Boenink, Annette D. ; Hoogendijk, Witte J. G. ; van Waarde, Jeroen A. ; Busschbach, Jan J. V. / Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry. In: General Hospital Psychiatry. 2018 ; Vol. 55. pp. 27-37.
@article{f4ea426a212341bab2ece49972b3c472,
title = "Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry",
abstract = "Objective: To define generic quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry from the perspectives of patients, professionals (physicians, nurses, and managers), and payers (health insurance companies). Methods: Quality variables were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. A working. group consisting of patients', professionals' and payers' representatives was mandated by their respective umbrella organizations. The working group prioritized the quality variables that were identified. Core values were defined and subsequently linked to preliminary quality indicators. These were tested for feasibility in ten hospitals in a four-week period. Stakeholder consultation took place by means of two invitational conferences and two written commentary rounds. Results: Forty-one quality variables were identified from the literature. After prioritization, seven core values were defined and translated to 22 preliminary indicators. Overall, the feasibility study showed high relevance scores and good implementability of the preliminary quality indicators. A final set of twenty-two quality indicators (17 structure, 3 process and 2 outcome indicators) was then established using a consensus-based approach. Conclusion: Consensus on a quality framework for general hospital psychiatry was built by incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders. Results of the feasibility study suggest broad support and good implementability of the final quality indicators. Structural indicators were broadly defined, and process and outcome indicators are generic to facilitate quality measurement across settings. The quality indicator set can now be used to facilitate quality and outcome assessment, stimulate standardization of services, and help demonstrate (cost-) effectiveness.",
author = "{van Schijndel}, {Maarten A.} and Caarls, {Petra J.} and {van Wijngaarden}, {Jeroen D. H.} and Wierdsma, {Andr{\'e} I.} and Lijmer, {Jeroen G.} and Boenink, {Annette D.} and Hoogendijk, {Witte J. G.} and {van Waarde}, {Jeroen A.} and Busschbach, {Jan J. V.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.009",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "27--37",
journal = "General Hospital Psychiatry",
issn = "0163-8343",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

van Schijndel, MA, Caarls, PJ, van Wijngaarden, JDH, Wierdsma, AI, Lijmer, JG, Boenink, AD, Hoogendijk, WJG, van Waarde, JA & Busschbach, JJV 2018, 'Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry' General Hospital Psychiatry, vol. 55, pp. 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.009

Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry. / van Schijndel, Maarten A.; Caarls, Petra J.; van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H.; Wierdsma, André I.; Lijmer, Jeroen G.; Boenink, Annette D.; Hoogendijk, Witte J. G.; van Waarde, Jeroen A.; Busschbach, Jan J. V.

In: General Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 55, 2018, p. 27-37.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying value-based quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry

AU - van Schijndel, Maarten A.

AU - Caarls, Petra J.

AU - van Wijngaarden, Jeroen D. H.

AU - Wierdsma, André I.

AU - Lijmer, Jeroen G.

AU - Boenink, Annette D.

AU - Hoogendijk, Witte J. G.

AU - van Waarde, Jeroen A.

AU - Busschbach, Jan J. V.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Objective: To define generic quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry from the perspectives of patients, professionals (physicians, nurses, and managers), and payers (health insurance companies). Methods: Quality variables were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. A working. group consisting of patients', professionals' and payers' representatives was mandated by their respective umbrella organizations. The working group prioritized the quality variables that were identified. Core values were defined and subsequently linked to preliminary quality indicators. These were tested for feasibility in ten hospitals in a four-week period. Stakeholder consultation took place by means of two invitational conferences and two written commentary rounds. Results: Forty-one quality variables were identified from the literature. After prioritization, seven core values were defined and translated to 22 preliminary indicators. Overall, the feasibility study showed high relevance scores and good implementability of the preliminary quality indicators. A final set of twenty-two quality indicators (17 structure, 3 process and 2 outcome indicators) was then established using a consensus-based approach. Conclusion: Consensus on a quality framework for general hospital psychiatry was built by incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders. Results of the feasibility study suggest broad support and good implementability of the final quality indicators. Structural indicators were broadly defined, and process and outcome indicators are generic to facilitate quality measurement across settings. The quality indicator set can now be used to facilitate quality and outcome assessment, stimulate standardization of services, and help demonstrate (cost-) effectiveness.

AB - Objective: To define generic quality indicators for general hospital psychiatry from the perspectives of patients, professionals (physicians, nurses, and managers), and payers (health insurance companies). Methods: Quality variables were identified by reviewing the relevant literature. A working. group consisting of patients', professionals' and payers' representatives was mandated by their respective umbrella organizations. The working group prioritized the quality variables that were identified. Core values were defined and subsequently linked to preliminary quality indicators. These were tested for feasibility in ten hospitals in a four-week period. Stakeholder consultation took place by means of two invitational conferences and two written commentary rounds. Results: Forty-one quality variables were identified from the literature. After prioritization, seven core values were defined and translated to 22 preliminary indicators. Overall, the feasibility study showed high relevance scores and good implementability of the preliminary quality indicators. A final set of twenty-two quality indicators (17 structure, 3 process and 2 outcome indicators) was then established using a consensus-based approach. Conclusion: Consensus on a quality framework for general hospital psychiatry was built by incorporating the perspectives of relevant stakeholders. Results of the feasibility study suggest broad support and good implementability of the final quality indicators. Structural indicators were broadly defined, and process and outcome indicators are generic to facilitate quality measurement across settings. The quality indicator set can now be used to facilitate quality and outcome assessment, stimulate standardization of services, and help demonstrate (cost-) effectiveness.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85054303881&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30296675

U2 - 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2018.09.009

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 27

EP - 37

JO - General Hospital Psychiatry

JF - General Hospital Psychiatry

SN - 0163-8343

ER -