Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: Process and outcome

Bert Molewijk, Maarten Verkerk, Henk Milius, Guy Widdershoven

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Clinical moral case deliberation consists of the systematic reflection on a concrete moral case-by health care professionals. This paper presents the study of a 4-year moral deliberation project. Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to: (a) describe the practice and the theoretical background of moral deliberation, (b) describe the moral deliberation project, (c) present the outcomes of the evaluation of the moral case deliberation sessions, and (d) present the implementation process. Methods: The implementation process is both monitored and supported by an interactive responsive evaluation design with: (a) in-depth interviews, (b) Maastricht evaluation questionnaires, (c) evaluation survey, and (d) ethnographic participant observation. In accordance with the theory of responsive evaluation, researchers acted both as evaluators and moderators (i.e. ethicists). Results: Both qualitative and quantitative results showed that the moral case deliberations, the role of the ethics facilitator, and the train-the-facilitator program were regarded as useful and were evaluated as (very) positive. Health care professionals reported that they improved their moral competencies (i.e. knowledge, attitude and skills). However, the new trained facilitators lacked a clear organisational structure and felt overburdened with the implementation process. The paper ends with both practical and research suggestions for future moral deliberation projects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)43-56
Number of pages14
JournalMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2008

Cite this

@article{c6bcf6083420483fb6405c71c6ba2aef,
title = "Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: Process and outcome",
abstract = "Background: Clinical moral case deliberation consists of the systematic reflection on a concrete moral case-by health care professionals. This paper presents the study of a 4-year moral deliberation project. Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to: (a) describe the practice and the theoretical background of moral deliberation, (b) describe the moral deliberation project, (c) present the outcomes of the evaluation of the moral case deliberation sessions, and (d) present the implementation process. Methods: The implementation process is both monitored and supported by an interactive responsive evaluation design with: (a) in-depth interviews, (b) Maastricht evaluation questionnaires, (c) evaluation survey, and (d) ethnographic participant observation. In accordance with the theory of responsive evaluation, researchers acted both as evaluators and moderators (i.e. ethicists). Results: Both qualitative and quantitative results showed that the moral case deliberations, the role of the ethics facilitator, and the train-the-facilitator program were regarded as useful and were evaluated as (very) positive. Health care professionals reported that they improved their moral competencies (i.e. knowledge, attitude and skills). However, the new trained facilitators lacked a clear organisational structure and felt overburdened with the implementation process. The paper ends with both practical and research suggestions for future moral deliberation projects.",
keywords = "Clinical moral case deliberation, Implementation, Moral competency, Responsive evaluation design, Train-the-facilitator program",
author = "Bert Molewijk and Maarten Verkerk and Henk Milius and Guy Widdershoven",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11019-007-9103-1",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "43--56",
journal = "Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy",
issn = "1386-7423",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "1",

}

Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital : Process and outcome. / Molewijk, Bert; Verkerk, Maarten; Milius, Henk; Widdershoven, Guy.

In: Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.03.2008, p. 43-56.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital

T2 - Process and outcome

AU - Molewijk, Bert

AU - Verkerk, Maarten

AU - Milius, Henk

AU - Widdershoven, Guy

PY - 2008/3/1

Y1 - 2008/3/1

N2 - Background: Clinical moral case deliberation consists of the systematic reflection on a concrete moral case-by health care professionals. This paper presents the study of a 4-year moral deliberation project. Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to: (a) describe the practice and the theoretical background of moral deliberation, (b) describe the moral deliberation project, (c) present the outcomes of the evaluation of the moral case deliberation sessions, and (d) present the implementation process. Methods: The implementation process is both monitored and supported by an interactive responsive evaluation design with: (a) in-depth interviews, (b) Maastricht evaluation questionnaires, (c) evaluation survey, and (d) ethnographic participant observation. In accordance with the theory of responsive evaluation, researchers acted both as evaluators and moderators (i.e. ethicists). Results: Both qualitative and quantitative results showed that the moral case deliberations, the role of the ethics facilitator, and the train-the-facilitator program were regarded as useful and were evaluated as (very) positive. Health care professionals reported that they improved their moral competencies (i.e. knowledge, attitude and skills). However, the new trained facilitators lacked a clear organisational structure and felt overburdened with the implementation process. The paper ends with both practical and research suggestions for future moral deliberation projects.

AB - Background: Clinical moral case deliberation consists of the systematic reflection on a concrete moral case-by health care professionals. This paper presents the study of a 4-year moral deliberation project. Objectives: The objectives of this paper are to: (a) describe the practice and the theoretical background of moral deliberation, (b) describe the moral deliberation project, (c) present the outcomes of the evaluation of the moral case deliberation sessions, and (d) present the implementation process. Methods: The implementation process is both monitored and supported by an interactive responsive evaluation design with: (a) in-depth interviews, (b) Maastricht evaluation questionnaires, (c) evaluation survey, and (d) ethnographic participant observation. In accordance with the theory of responsive evaluation, researchers acted both as evaluators and moderators (i.e. ethicists). Results: Both qualitative and quantitative results showed that the moral case deliberations, the role of the ethics facilitator, and the train-the-facilitator program were regarded as useful and were evaluated as (very) positive. Health care professionals reported that they improved their moral competencies (i.e. knowledge, attitude and skills). However, the new trained facilitators lacked a clear organisational structure and felt overburdened with the implementation process. The paper ends with both practical and research suggestions for future moral deliberation projects.

KW - Clinical moral case deliberation

KW - Implementation

KW - Moral competency

KW - Responsive evaluation design

KW - Train-the-facilitator program

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749188835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11019-007-9103-1

DO - 10.1007/s11019-007-9103-1

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 43

EP - 56

JO - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

JF - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

SN - 1386-7423

IS - 1

ER -