Improved reliability of hippocampal atrophy rate measurement in mild cognitive impairment using fluid registration

L. A. van de Pol, Josephine Barnes, R. I. Scahill, C. Frost, E. B. Lewis, R. G. Boyes, R. A. van Schijndel, P. Scheltens, N. C. Fox, F. Barkhof

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

MRI-derived rates of hippocampal atrophy may serve as surrogate markers of disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Manual delineation is the gold standard in hippocampal volumetry; however, this technique is time-consuming and subject to errors. We aimed to compare regional non-linear (fluid) registration measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates against manual delineation in MCI. Hippocampi of 18 subjects were manually outlined twice on MRI scan-pairs (interval ± SD: 2.01 ± 0.11 years), and volumes were subtracted to calculate change over time. Following global affine and local rigid registration, regional fluid registration was performed from which atrophy rates were derived from the Jacobian determinants over the hippocampal region. Atrophy rates as derived by fluid registration were computed using both forward (repeat onto baseline) and backward (baseline onto repeat) registration. Reliability for both methods and agreement between methods was assessed. Mean ± SD hippocampal atrophy rates (%/year) derived by manual delineation were: left: 2.13 ± 1.62; right: 2.36 ± 1.78 and for regional fluid registration: forward: left: 2.39 ± 1.68; right: 2.49 ± 1.52 and backward: left: 2.21 ± 1.51; right: 2.42 ± 1.49. Mean hippocampal atrophy rates did not differ between both methods. Reliability for manual hippocampal volume measurements (cross-sectional) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): baseline and follow-up, left and right, > 0.99). However, the resulting ICC for manual measurements of hippocampal volume change (longitudinal) was considerably lower (left: 0.798; right: 0.850) compared with regional fluid registration (forward: left: 0.985; right: 0.988 and backward: left: 0.975; right: 0.989). We conclude that regional fluid registration is more reliable than manual delineation in assessing hippocampal atrophy rates, without sacrificing sensitivity to change. This method may be useful to quantify hippocampal volume change, given the reduction in operator time and improved precision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1036-1041
Number of pages6
JournalNeuroImage
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2007

Cite this

van de Pol, L. A. ; Barnes, Josephine ; Scahill, R. I. ; Frost, C. ; Lewis, E. B. ; Boyes, R. G. ; van Schijndel, R. A. ; Scheltens, P. ; Fox, N. C. ; Barkhof, F. / Improved reliability of hippocampal atrophy rate measurement in mild cognitive impairment using fluid registration. In: NeuroImage. 2007 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 1036-1041.
@article{340cebbf01e1420db710f5ece5041fc8,
title = "Improved reliability of hippocampal atrophy rate measurement in mild cognitive impairment using fluid registration",
abstract = "MRI-derived rates of hippocampal atrophy may serve as surrogate markers of disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Manual delineation is the gold standard in hippocampal volumetry; however, this technique is time-consuming and subject to errors. We aimed to compare regional non-linear (fluid) registration measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates against manual delineation in MCI. Hippocampi of 18 subjects were manually outlined twice on MRI scan-pairs (interval ± SD: 2.01 ± 0.11 years), and volumes were subtracted to calculate change over time. Following global affine and local rigid registration, regional fluid registration was performed from which atrophy rates were derived from the Jacobian determinants over the hippocampal region. Atrophy rates as derived by fluid registration were computed using both forward (repeat onto baseline) and backward (baseline onto repeat) registration. Reliability for both methods and agreement between methods was assessed. Mean ± SD hippocampal atrophy rates ({\%}/year) derived by manual delineation were: left: 2.13 ± 1.62; right: 2.36 ± 1.78 and for regional fluid registration: forward: left: 2.39 ± 1.68; right: 2.49 ± 1.52 and backward: left: 2.21 ± 1.51; right: 2.42 ± 1.49. Mean hippocampal atrophy rates did not differ between both methods. Reliability for manual hippocampal volume measurements (cross-sectional) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): baseline and follow-up, left and right, > 0.99). However, the resulting ICC for manual measurements of hippocampal volume change (longitudinal) was considerably lower (left: 0.798; right: 0.850) compared with regional fluid registration (forward: left: 0.985; right: 0.988 and backward: left: 0.975; right: 0.989). We conclude that regional fluid registration is more reliable than manual delineation in assessing hippocampal atrophy rates, without sacrificing sensitivity to change. This method may be useful to quantify hippocampal volume change, given the reduction in operator time and improved precision.",
author = "{van de Pol}, {L. A.} and Josephine Barnes and Scahill, {R. I.} and C. Frost and Lewis, {E. B.} and Boyes, {R. G.} and {van Schijndel}, {R. A.} and P. Scheltens and Fox, {N. C.} and F. Barkhof",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.033",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "1036--1041",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Improved reliability of hippocampal atrophy rate measurement in mild cognitive impairment using fluid registration. / van de Pol, L. A.; Barnes, Josephine; Scahill, R. I.; Frost, C.; Lewis, E. B.; Boyes, R. G.; van Schijndel, R. A.; Scheltens, P.; Fox, N. C.; Barkhof, F.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 34, No. 3, 01.02.2007, p. 1036-1041.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved reliability of hippocampal atrophy rate measurement in mild cognitive impairment using fluid registration

AU - van de Pol, L. A.

AU - Barnes, Josephine

AU - Scahill, R. I.

AU - Frost, C.

AU - Lewis, E. B.

AU - Boyes, R. G.

AU - van Schijndel, R. A.

AU - Scheltens, P.

AU - Fox, N. C.

AU - Barkhof, F.

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - MRI-derived rates of hippocampal atrophy may serve as surrogate markers of disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Manual delineation is the gold standard in hippocampal volumetry; however, this technique is time-consuming and subject to errors. We aimed to compare regional non-linear (fluid) registration measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates against manual delineation in MCI. Hippocampi of 18 subjects were manually outlined twice on MRI scan-pairs (interval ± SD: 2.01 ± 0.11 years), and volumes were subtracted to calculate change over time. Following global affine and local rigid registration, regional fluid registration was performed from which atrophy rates were derived from the Jacobian determinants over the hippocampal region. Atrophy rates as derived by fluid registration were computed using both forward (repeat onto baseline) and backward (baseline onto repeat) registration. Reliability for both methods and agreement between methods was assessed. Mean ± SD hippocampal atrophy rates (%/year) derived by manual delineation were: left: 2.13 ± 1.62; right: 2.36 ± 1.78 and for regional fluid registration: forward: left: 2.39 ± 1.68; right: 2.49 ± 1.52 and backward: left: 2.21 ± 1.51; right: 2.42 ± 1.49. Mean hippocampal atrophy rates did not differ between both methods. Reliability for manual hippocampal volume measurements (cross-sectional) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): baseline and follow-up, left and right, > 0.99). However, the resulting ICC for manual measurements of hippocampal volume change (longitudinal) was considerably lower (left: 0.798; right: 0.850) compared with regional fluid registration (forward: left: 0.985; right: 0.988 and backward: left: 0.975; right: 0.989). We conclude that regional fluid registration is more reliable than manual delineation in assessing hippocampal atrophy rates, without sacrificing sensitivity to change. This method may be useful to quantify hippocampal volume change, given the reduction in operator time and improved precision.

AB - MRI-derived rates of hippocampal atrophy may serve as surrogate markers of disease progression in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Manual delineation is the gold standard in hippocampal volumetry; however, this technique is time-consuming and subject to errors. We aimed to compare regional non-linear (fluid) registration measurement of hippocampal atrophy rates against manual delineation in MCI. Hippocampi of 18 subjects were manually outlined twice on MRI scan-pairs (interval ± SD: 2.01 ± 0.11 years), and volumes were subtracted to calculate change over time. Following global affine and local rigid registration, regional fluid registration was performed from which atrophy rates were derived from the Jacobian determinants over the hippocampal region. Atrophy rates as derived by fluid registration were computed using both forward (repeat onto baseline) and backward (baseline onto repeat) registration. Reliability for both methods and agreement between methods was assessed. Mean ± SD hippocampal atrophy rates (%/year) derived by manual delineation were: left: 2.13 ± 1.62; right: 2.36 ± 1.78 and for regional fluid registration: forward: left: 2.39 ± 1.68; right: 2.49 ± 1.52 and backward: left: 2.21 ± 1.51; right: 2.42 ± 1.49. Mean hippocampal atrophy rates did not differ between both methods. Reliability for manual hippocampal volume measurements (cross-sectional) was high (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): baseline and follow-up, left and right, > 0.99). However, the resulting ICC for manual measurements of hippocampal volume change (longitudinal) was considerably lower (left: 0.798; right: 0.850) compared with regional fluid registration (forward: left: 0.985; right: 0.988 and backward: left: 0.975; right: 0.989). We conclude that regional fluid registration is more reliable than manual delineation in assessing hippocampal atrophy rates, without sacrificing sensitivity to change. This method may be useful to quantify hippocampal volume change, given the reduction in operator time and improved precision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947119777&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.033

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.033

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 1036

EP - 1041

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 3

ER -