Informed decision making in the context of childhood immunization

Birthe A. Lehmann, Hester E. de Melker, Daniëlle R.M. Timmermans, Liesbeth Mollema

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective We aimed to assess informed decision making about childhood immunization by measuring knowledge, deliberation and value-consistency. Additionally, we investigated whether informed decision making is different for parents who accept and parents who decline vaccination. Methods Parents of at least one child between 3 months and 3,5 years of age were randomly selected from a vaccination register and were asked to fill in an online questionnaire measuring informed decision making. Results In total, 1615 parents completed the questionnaire (16.2%). 77.6% of the parents were classified as having sufficient knowledge, 34.3% of the decisions were deliberate, and 94% were value-consistent. This resulted in 21% of parents who were classified as making an informed decision. Vaccination decliners more often made a decision classified as informed than vaccination acceptors (34.3% vs. 19.7%). When decliners made a decision classified as uninformed, this was mainly due to insufficient knowledge, while uninformed decisions among acceptors were mainly due to a low level of deliberation. Conclusion and practice implications Most parents made an uninformed decision about childhood vaccinations. Decision aids and counseling by child vaccine providers could improve the knowledge of decliners and motivate acceptors to deliberate about their decision, and by that promote informed decision making.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2339-2345
Number of pages7
JournalPatient Education and Counseling
Volume100
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Cite this

Lehmann, Birthe A. ; de Melker, Hester E. ; Timmermans, Daniëlle R.M. ; Mollema, Liesbeth. / Informed decision making in the context of childhood immunization. In: Patient Education and Counseling. 2017 ; Vol. 100, No. 12. pp. 2339-2345.
@article{11b09417fb3146eda5c1afec194cbc5f,
title = "Informed decision making in the context of childhood immunization",
abstract = "Objective We aimed to assess informed decision making about childhood immunization by measuring knowledge, deliberation and value-consistency. Additionally, we investigated whether informed decision making is different for parents who accept and parents who decline vaccination. Methods Parents of at least one child between 3 months and 3,5 years of age were randomly selected from a vaccination register and were asked to fill in an online questionnaire measuring informed decision making. Results In total, 1615 parents completed the questionnaire (16.2{\%}). 77.6{\%} of the parents were classified as having sufficient knowledge, 34.3{\%} of the decisions were deliberate, and 94{\%} were value-consistent. This resulted in 21{\%} of parents who were classified as making an informed decision. Vaccination decliners more often made a decision classified as informed than vaccination acceptors (34.3{\%} vs. 19.7{\%}). When decliners made a decision classified as uninformed, this was mainly due to insufficient knowledge, while uninformed decisions among acceptors were mainly due to a low level of deliberation. Conclusion and practice implications Most parents made an uninformed decision about childhood vaccinations. Decision aids and counseling by child vaccine providers could improve the knowledge of decliners and motivate acceptors to deliberate about their decision, and by that promote informed decision making.",
keywords = "Childhood vaccinations, Immunization, Informed decision making, Parents",
author = "Lehmann, {Birthe A.} and {de Melker}, {Hester E.} and Timmermans, {Dani{\"e}lle R.M.} and Liesbeth Mollema",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.015",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "2339--2345",
journal = "Patient Education and Counseling",
issn = "0738-3991",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "12",

}

Informed decision making in the context of childhood immunization. / Lehmann, Birthe A.; de Melker, Hester E.; Timmermans, Daniëlle R.M.; Mollema, Liesbeth.

In: Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 100, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 2339-2345.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Informed decision making in the context of childhood immunization

AU - Lehmann, Birthe A.

AU - de Melker, Hester E.

AU - Timmermans, Daniëlle R.M.

AU - Mollema, Liesbeth

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Objective We aimed to assess informed decision making about childhood immunization by measuring knowledge, deliberation and value-consistency. Additionally, we investigated whether informed decision making is different for parents who accept and parents who decline vaccination. Methods Parents of at least one child between 3 months and 3,5 years of age were randomly selected from a vaccination register and were asked to fill in an online questionnaire measuring informed decision making. Results In total, 1615 parents completed the questionnaire (16.2%). 77.6% of the parents were classified as having sufficient knowledge, 34.3% of the decisions were deliberate, and 94% were value-consistent. This resulted in 21% of parents who were classified as making an informed decision. Vaccination decliners more often made a decision classified as informed than vaccination acceptors (34.3% vs. 19.7%). When decliners made a decision classified as uninformed, this was mainly due to insufficient knowledge, while uninformed decisions among acceptors were mainly due to a low level of deliberation. Conclusion and practice implications Most parents made an uninformed decision about childhood vaccinations. Decision aids and counseling by child vaccine providers could improve the knowledge of decliners and motivate acceptors to deliberate about their decision, and by that promote informed decision making.

AB - Objective We aimed to assess informed decision making about childhood immunization by measuring knowledge, deliberation and value-consistency. Additionally, we investigated whether informed decision making is different for parents who accept and parents who decline vaccination. Methods Parents of at least one child between 3 months and 3,5 years of age were randomly selected from a vaccination register and were asked to fill in an online questionnaire measuring informed decision making. Results In total, 1615 parents completed the questionnaire (16.2%). 77.6% of the parents were classified as having sufficient knowledge, 34.3% of the decisions were deliberate, and 94% were value-consistent. This resulted in 21% of parents who were classified as making an informed decision. Vaccination decliners more often made a decision classified as informed than vaccination acceptors (34.3% vs. 19.7%). When decliners made a decision classified as uninformed, this was mainly due to insufficient knowledge, while uninformed decisions among acceptors were mainly due to a low level of deliberation. Conclusion and practice implications Most parents made an uninformed decision about childhood vaccinations. Decision aids and counseling by child vaccine providers could improve the knowledge of decliners and motivate acceptors to deliberate about their decision, and by that promote informed decision making.

KW - Childhood vaccinations

KW - Immunization

KW - Informed decision making

KW - Parents

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021792418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.015

DO - 10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.015

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 2339

EP - 2345

JO - Patient Education and Counseling

JF - Patient Education and Counseling

SN - 0738-3991

IS - 12

ER -