Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards

Max Jakobsson, Annelie Gutke, Lidwine B. Mokkink, Rob Smeets, Mari Lundberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and relevant reference lists were used as data sources. Study Selection Two authors independently selected articles addressing the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment One author performed data extraction, and a second author independently checked the data extraction for accuracy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Synthesis and Analysis Data synthesis was performed by all authors to determine the level of evidence per measurement property per physical capacity task. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 5-minute walk, 50-ft (1/415.3-m) walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, and Timed "Up & Go" tasks displayed moderate to strong evidence for positive ratings of both reliability and construct validity. The 1-minute stair-climbing, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, shuttle walking, and Timed "Up & Go" tasks showed limited evidence for positive ratings of responsiveness. Limitations The COSMIN 4-point checklist was originally developed for patient-reported outcome measures and not physical capacity tasks. Conclusions The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk, 5-minute walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, Timed "Up & Go," and 1-minute stair-climbing tasks are promising tests for the measurement of functioning in patients with chronic low back pain. However, more research on the measurement error and responsiveness of these tasks is needed to be able to fully recommend them as outcome measures in research and clinical practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)457-477
JournalPhysical Therapy
Volume99
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{c34efc4fde884927b9bdbcacc0bfd8ba,
title = "Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards",
abstract = "Background Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and relevant reference lists were used as data sources. Study Selection Two authors independently selected articles addressing the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment One author performed data extraction, and a second author independently checked the data extraction for accuracy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Synthesis and Analysis Data synthesis was performed by all authors to determine the level of evidence per measurement property per physical capacity task. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 5-minute walk, 50-ft (1/415.3-m) walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, and Timed {"}Up & Go{"} tasks displayed moderate to strong evidence for positive ratings of both reliability and construct validity. The 1-minute stair-climbing, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, shuttle walking, and Timed {"}Up & Go{"} tasks showed limited evidence for positive ratings of responsiveness. Limitations The COSMIN 4-point checklist was originally developed for patient-reported outcome measures and not physical capacity tasks. Conclusions The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk, 5-minute walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, Timed {"}Up & Go,{"} and 1-minute stair-climbing tasks are promising tests for the measurement of functioning in patients with chronic low back pain. However, more research on the measurement error and responsiveness of these tasks is needed to be able to fully recommend them as outcome measures in research and clinical practice.",
author = "Max Jakobsson and Annelie Gutke and Mokkink, {Lidwine B.} and Rob Smeets and Mari Lundberg",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1093/ptj/pzy159",
language = "English",
volume = "99",
pages = "457--477",
journal = "Physical Therapy",
issn = "0031-9023",
publisher = "American Physical Therapy Association",
number = "4",

}

Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards. / Jakobsson, Max; Gutke, Annelie; Mokkink, Lidwine B.; Smeets, Rob; Lundberg, Mari.

In: Physical Therapy, Vol. 99, No. 4, 2019, p. 457-477.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards

AU - Jakobsson, Max

AU - Gutke, Annelie

AU - Mokkink, Lidwine B.

AU - Smeets, Rob

AU - Lundberg, Mari

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and relevant reference lists were used as data sources. Study Selection Two authors independently selected articles addressing the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment One author performed data extraction, and a second author independently checked the data extraction for accuracy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Synthesis and Analysis Data synthesis was performed by all authors to determine the level of evidence per measurement property per physical capacity task. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 5-minute walk, 50-ft (1/415.3-m) walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, and Timed "Up & Go" tasks displayed moderate to strong evidence for positive ratings of both reliability and construct validity. The 1-minute stair-climbing, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, shuttle walking, and Timed "Up & Go" tasks showed limited evidence for positive ratings of responsiveness. Limitations The COSMIN 4-point checklist was originally developed for patient-reported outcome measures and not physical capacity tasks. Conclusions The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk, 5-minute walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, Timed "Up & Go," and 1-minute stair-climbing tasks are promising tests for the measurement of functioning in patients with chronic low back pain. However, more research on the measurement error and responsiveness of these tasks is needed to be able to fully recommend them as outcome measures in research and clinical practice.

AB - Background Physical capacity tasks (ie, observer-administered outcome measures that comprise a standardized activity) are useful for assessing functioning in patients with low back pain. Purpose The purpose of this study was to systematically review the level of evidence for the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks. Data Sources MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and relevant reference lists were used as data sources. Study Selection Two authors independently selected articles addressing the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of physical capacity tasks, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment One author performed data extraction, and a second author independently checked the data extraction for accuracy. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality with the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) 4-point checklist, and a third author resolved discrepancies. Data Synthesis and Analysis Data synthesis was performed by all authors to determine the level of evidence per measurement property per physical capacity task. The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 5-minute walk, 50-ft (1/415.3-m) walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, and Timed "Up & Go" tasks displayed moderate to strong evidence for positive ratings of both reliability and construct validity. The 1-minute stair-climbing, 5-repetition sit-to-stand, shuttle walking, and Timed "Up & Go" tasks showed limited evidence for positive ratings of responsiveness. Limitations The COSMIN 4-point checklist was originally developed for patient-reported outcome measures and not physical capacity tasks. Conclusions The 5-repetition sit-to-stand, 50-ft walk, 5-minute walk, Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation, Timed "Up & Go," and 1-minute stair-climbing tasks are promising tests for the measurement of functioning in patients with chronic low back pain. However, more research on the measurement error and responsiveness of these tasks is needed to be able to fully recommend them as outcome measures in research and clinical practice.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063757011&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30566577

U2 - 10.1093/ptj/pzy159

DO - 10.1093/ptj/pzy159

M3 - Review article

VL - 99

SP - 457

EP - 477

JO - Physical Therapy

JF - Physical Therapy

SN - 0031-9023

IS - 4

ER -