Longitudinal study of motor performance and its relation to motor capacity in children with cerebral palsy

M. van Eck, A.J. Dallmeijer, J.M. Voorman, J.G. Becher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the course of motor performance and analyse its relationship with motor capacity over a period of 3 years in 104 children (66 males, 38 females; 43% of those initially invited) with cerebral palsy (CP) aged 9, 11, and 13 years at the start of the study. Forty-one had hemiplegia, 42 diplegia, 21 tetraplegia; 83 spastic CP, 17 dyskinetic/mixed, and four ataxic CP. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels were I, n=49; II, n=15; III, n=10; IV, n=12; and V, n=18. METHOD: Motor performance (what a child does do) was determined using the gross motor skills subscale of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and motor capacity [what a child can do] was determined using the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66). The measurements were performed annually over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: The course of motor performance in mildly affected children (GMFCS level I) was more favorable than in more severely affected children. An increase in motor capacity was significantly related to an improvement in motor performance over the 3 years. INTERPRETATION: Training motor capacity in children with CP seems to be important for improving motor performance. Interventions should also focus on environmental adaptations and improving mobility equipment. A limitation of this study was that the instruments used did not contain the same items on capacity and performance level
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)303-310
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this

@article{eb09a897f1924d7a9638a4af59c9272f,
title = "Longitudinal study of motor performance and its relation to motor capacity in children with cerebral palsy",
abstract = "AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the course of motor performance and analyse its relationship with motor capacity over a period of 3 years in 104 children (66 males, 38 females; 43{\%} of those initially invited) with cerebral palsy (CP) aged 9, 11, and 13 years at the start of the study. Forty-one had hemiplegia, 42 diplegia, 21 tetraplegia; 83 spastic CP, 17 dyskinetic/mixed, and four ataxic CP. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels were I, n=49; II, n=15; III, n=10; IV, n=12; and V, n=18. METHOD: Motor performance (what a child does do) was determined using the gross motor skills subscale of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and motor capacity [what a child can do] was determined using the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66). The measurements were performed annually over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: The course of motor performance in mildly affected children (GMFCS level I) was more favorable than in more severely affected children. An increase in motor capacity was significantly related to an improvement in motor performance over the 3 years. INTERPRETATION: Training motor capacity in children with CP seems to be important for improving motor performance. Interventions should also focus on environmental adaptations and improving mobility equipment. A limitation of this study was that the instruments used did not contain the same items on capacity and performance level",
author = "{van Eck}, M. and A.J. Dallmeijer and J.M. Voorman and J.G. Becher",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03263.x",
language = "Undefined/Unknown",
volume = "51",
pages = "303--310",
journal = "Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology",
issn = "0012-1622",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Longitudinal study of motor performance and its relation to motor capacity in children with cerebral palsy. / van Eck, M.; Dallmeijer, A.J.; Voorman, J.M.; Becher, J.G.

In: Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, Vol. 51, No. 4, 2009, p. 303-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Longitudinal study of motor performance and its relation to motor capacity in children with cerebral palsy

AU - van Eck, M.

AU - Dallmeijer, A.J.

AU - Voorman, J.M.

AU - Becher, J.G.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the course of motor performance and analyse its relationship with motor capacity over a period of 3 years in 104 children (66 males, 38 females; 43% of those initially invited) with cerebral palsy (CP) aged 9, 11, and 13 years at the start of the study. Forty-one had hemiplegia, 42 diplegia, 21 tetraplegia; 83 spastic CP, 17 dyskinetic/mixed, and four ataxic CP. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels were I, n=49; II, n=15; III, n=10; IV, n=12; and V, n=18. METHOD: Motor performance (what a child does do) was determined using the gross motor skills subscale of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and motor capacity [what a child can do] was determined using the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66). The measurements were performed annually over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: The course of motor performance in mildly affected children (GMFCS level I) was more favorable than in more severely affected children. An increase in motor capacity was significantly related to an improvement in motor performance over the 3 years. INTERPRETATION: Training motor capacity in children with CP seems to be important for improving motor performance. Interventions should also focus on environmental adaptations and improving mobility equipment. A limitation of this study was that the instruments used did not contain the same items on capacity and performance level

AB - AIM: The aim of this study was to describe the course of motor performance and analyse its relationship with motor capacity over a period of 3 years in 104 children (66 males, 38 females; 43% of those initially invited) with cerebral palsy (CP) aged 9, 11, and 13 years at the start of the study. Forty-one had hemiplegia, 42 diplegia, 21 tetraplegia; 83 spastic CP, 17 dyskinetic/mixed, and four ataxic CP. Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels were I, n=49; II, n=15; III, n=10; IV, n=12; and V, n=18. METHOD: Motor performance (what a child does do) was determined using the gross motor skills subscale of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and motor capacity [what a child can do] was determined using the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (GMFM-66). The measurements were performed annually over a period of 3 years. RESULTS: The course of motor performance in mildly affected children (GMFCS level I) was more favorable than in more severely affected children. An increase in motor capacity was significantly related to an improvement in motor performance over the 3 years. INTERPRETATION: Training motor capacity in children with CP seems to be important for improving motor performance. Interventions should also focus on environmental adaptations and improving mobility equipment. A limitation of this study was that the instruments used did not contain the same items on capacity and performance level

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03263.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03263.x

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 303

EP - 310

JO - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

JF - Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

SN - 0012-1622

IS - 4

ER -