Major obstetric hemorrhage: a follow-up survey on quality of life of women and their partners

Giel van Stralen, Laurine L. M. Ruijten, Ad A. Kaptein, Ron Wolterbeek, Jos van Roosmalen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Introduction: A description is given of the quality of life (QOL) of women who were treated with peripartum embolization or hysterectomy for major obstetric hemorrhage (MOH). Methods: Questionnaires assessing QOL, combined with questionnaires and drawings assessing illness perceptions, were used to compare women with MOH to reference groups provided by the questionnaires. Results: Women who experienced MOH have similar scores on QOL questionnaires compared to reference groups. Women treated with arterial embolization scored better than women treated with hysterectomy. Partners of women with MOH scored better on QOL questionnaires than reference groups. Drawings reflect the major emotional impact of MOH. Discussion: MOH does not seem to have a negative effect on QOL 6–8 years after the event, although drawings and verbalizations indicate major emotional impact. More extensive follow-up is advised for early recognition of the need for psychological help. Women after embolization seem to have better QOL compared to women after hysterectomy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-46
JournalJournal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume39
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

van Stralen, Giel ; Ruijten, Laurine L. M. ; Kaptein, Ad A. ; Wolterbeek, Ron ; van Roosmalen, Jos. / Major obstetric hemorrhage: a follow-up survey on quality of life of women and their partners. In: Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2018 ; Vol. 39, No. 1. pp. 38-46.
@article{af6e12404acb48ac96ba191ff4136614,
title = "Major obstetric hemorrhage: a follow-up survey on quality of life of women and their partners",
abstract = "Introduction: A description is given of the quality of life (QOL) of women who were treated with peripartum embolization or hysterectomy for major obstetric hemorrhage (MOH). Methods: Questionnaires assessing QOL, combined with questionnaires and drawings assessing illness perceptions, were used to compare women with MOH to reference groups provided by the questionnaires. Results: Women who experienced MOH have similar scores on QOL questionnaires compared to reference groups. Women treated with arterial embolization scored better than women treated with hysterectomy. Partners of women with MOH scored better on QOL questionnaires than reference groups. Drawings reflect the major emotional impact of MOH. Discussion: MOH does not seem to have a negative effect on QOL 6–8 years after the event, although drawings and verbalizations indicate major emotional impact. More extensive follow-up is advised for early recognition of the need for psychological help. Women after embolization seem to have better QOL compared to women after hysterectomy.",
author = "{van Stralen}, Giel and Ruijten, {Laurine L. M.} and Kaptein, {Ad A.} and Ron Wolterbeek and {van Roosmalen}, Jos",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/0167482X.2017.1286640",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "38--46",
journal = "Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "0167-482X",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

Major obstetric hemorrhage: a follow-up survey on quality of life of women and their partners. / van Stralen, Giel; Ruijten, Laurine L. M.; Kaptein, Ad A.; Wolterbeek, Ron; van Roosmalen, Jos.

In: Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2018, p. 38-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Major obstetric hemorrhage: a follow-up survey on quality of life of women and their partners

AU - van Stralen, Giel

AU - Ruijten, Laurine L. M.

AU - Kaptein, Ad A.

AU - Wolterbeek, Ron

AU - van Roosmalen, Jos

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Introduction: A description is given of the quality of life (QOL) of women who were treated with peripartum embolization or hysterectomy for major obstetric hemorrhage (MOH). Methods: Questionnaires assessing QOL, combined with questionnaires and drawings assessing illness perceptions, were used to compare women with MOH to reference groups provided by the questionnaires. Results: Women who experienced MOH have similar scores on QOL questionnaires compared to reference groups. Women treated with arterial embolization scored better than women treated with hysterectomy. Partners of women with MOH scored better on QOL questionnaires than reference groups. Drawings reflect the major emotional impact of MOH. Discussion: MOH does not seem to have a negative effect on QOL 6–8 years after the event, although drawings and verbalizations indicate major emotional impact. More extensive follow-up is advised for early recognition of the need for psychological help. Women after embolization seem to have better QOL compared to women after hysterectomy.

AB - Introduction: A description is given of the quality of life (QOL) of women who were treated with peripartum embolization or hysterectomy for major obstetric hemorrhage (MOH). Methods: Questionnaires assessing QOL, combined with questionnaires and drawings assessing illness perceptions, were used to compare women with MOH to reference groups provided by the questionnaires. Results: Women who experienced MOH have similar scores on QOL questionnaires compared to reference groups. Women treated with arterial embolization scored better than women treated with hysterectomy. Partners of women with MOH scored better on QOL questionnaires than reference groups. Drawings reflect the major emotional impact of MOH. Discussion: MOH does not seem to have a negative effect on QOL 6–8 years after the event, although drawings and verbalizations indicate major emotional impact. More extensive follow-up is advised for early recognition of the need for psychological help. Women after embolization seem to have better QOL compared to women after hysterectomy.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85012050933&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28635529

U2 - 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1286640

DO - 10.1080/0167482X.2017.1286640

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 38

EP - 46

JO - Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 0167-482X

IS - 1

ER -