Minimal important change (MIC) is biased when the proportion of improved patients is not exactly 0.5

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractAcademic

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)82-83
JournalQuality of Life Research
Volume25
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Cite this

@article{beff865430094ecf81615c626ba195d4,
title = "Minimal important change (MIC) is biased when the proportion of improved patients is not exactly 0.5",
author = "Berend Terluin and Iris Eekhout and Terwee, {Caroline B.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "82--83",
journal = "Quality of Life Research",
issn = "0962-9343",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

Minimal important change (MIC) is biased when the proportion of improved patients is not exactly 0.5. / Terluin, Berend; Eekhout, Iris; Terwee, Caroline B.

In: Quality of Life Research, Vol. 25, 10.2016, p. 82-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting AbstractAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimal important change (MIC) is biased when the proportion of improved patients is not exactly 0.5

AU - Terluin, Berend

AU - Eekhout, Iris

AU - Terwee, Caroline B.

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

M3 - Meeting Abstract

VL - 25

SP - 82

EP - 83

JO - Quality of Life Research

JF - Quality of Life Research

SN - 0962-9343

ER -