Modifying ankle foot orthosis stiffness in patients with calf muscle weakness: Gait responses on group and individual level

Niels F.J. Waterval*, Frans Nollet, Jaap Harlaar, Merel Anne Brehm

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Background: To improve gait, persons with calf muscle weakness can be provided with a dorsal leaf spring ankle foot orthosis (DLS-AFO). These AFOs can store energy during stance and return this energy during push-off, which, in turn, reduces walking energy cost. Simulations indicate that the effect of the DLS-AFO on walking energy cost and gait biomechanics depends on its stiffness and on patient characteristics. We therefore studied the effect of varying DLS-AFO stiffness on reducing walking energy cost, and improving gait biomechanics and AFO generated power in persons with non-spastic calf muscle weakness, and whether the optimal AFO stiffness for maximally reducing walking energy cost varies between persons. Methods: Thirty-seven individuals with neuromuscular disorders and non-spastic calf muscle weakness were included. Participants were provided with a DLS-AFO of which the stiffness could be varied. For 5 stiffness configurations (ranging from 2.8 to 6.6 Nm/degree), walking energy cost (J/kg/m) was assessed using a 6-min comfortable walk test. Selected gait parameters, e.g. maximal dorsiflexion angle, ankle power, knee angle, knee moment and AFO generated power, were derived from 3D gait analysis. Results: On group level, no significant effect of DLS-AFO stiffness on reducing walking energy cost was found (p = 0.059, largest difference: 0.14 J/kg/m). The AFO stiffness that reduced energy cost the most varied between persons. The difference in energy cost between the least and most efficient AFO stiffness was on average 10.7%. Regarding gait biomechanics, increasing AFO stiffness significantly decreased maximal ankle dorsiflexion angle (-1.1 ± 0.1 degrees per 1 Nm/degree, p < 0.001) and peak ankle power (-0.09 ± 0.01 W/kg, p < 0.001). The reduction in minimal knee angle (-0.3 ± 0.1 degrees, p = 0.034), and increment in external knee extension moment in stance (-0.01 ± 0.01 Nm/kg, p = 0.016) were small, although all stiffness' substantially affected knee angle and knee moment compared to shoes only. No effect of stiffness on AFO generated power was found (p = 0.900). Conclusions: The optimal efficient DLS-AFO stiffness varied largely between persons with non-spastic calf muscle weakness. Results indicate this is caused by an individual trade-off between ankle angle and ankle power affected differently by AFO stiffness. We therefore recommend that the AFO stiffness should be individually optimized to best improve gait. Trial registration number: Nederlands Trial Register 5170. Registration date: May 7th 2015.

Original languageEnglish
Article number120
JournalJournal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 17 Oct 2019

Cite this