Neighbourhood safety and smoking in population subgroups: The HELIUS study

Erik J. Timmermans, Eleonore M. Veldhuizen, Marieke B. Snijder, Martijn Huisman, Anton E. Kunst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

This study examines the associations between neighbourhood safety and three types of smoking behaviour, and whether these associations differ by sex, age, ethnicity and individual-level socio-economic position. Baseline data (2011–2015) from the The HEalthy LIfe in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) were used. Smoking behaviour was based on self-report. Heavy smoking was defined as smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day. Nicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerström questionnaire. Geographic Information System techniques were used to construct local residential areas and to examine neighbourhood safety for these areas using micro-scale environmental data. Multilevel logistic regression analyses with 6-digit zip code area as a second level were used to assess the association between neighbourhood safety and smoking. In our study sample of 22,728 participants (18–70 years), 24.0% were current smokers, 13.7% were heavy smokers and 8.1% were nicotine dependent individuals. Higher levels of neighbourhood safety were significantly associated with less heavy smoking (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78–0.99) and less nicotine dependence (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69–0.95), but not with less current smoking (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.91–1.11). The associations between neighbourhood safety and the three types of smoking behaviour varied by ethnicity. For instance, higher levels of neighbourhood safety were associated with less current smoking in participants of African Surinamese origin (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57–0.89), but not in those of Dutch (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.91–1.39), South-Asian Surinamese (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.95–1.55), Turkish (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.84–1.38), Moroccan (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.12–2.10) or Ghanaian (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.47–2.94) origin. Policies that improve neighbourhood safety potentially contribute to less heavy smoking and nicotine dependence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-118
Number of pages8
JournalPreventive Medicine
Volume112
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2018

Cite this

Timmermans, Erik J. ; Veldhuizen, Eleonore M. ; Snijder, Marieke B. ; Huisman, Martijn ; Kunst, Anton E. / Neighbourhood safety and smoking in population subgroups : The HELIUS study. In: Preventive Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 112. pp. 111-118.
@article{7a840be22b23476f94b82c79e0672ea4,
title = "Neighbourhood safety and smoking in population subgroups: The HELIUS study",
abstract = "This study examines the associations between neighbourhood safety and three types of smoking behaviour, and whether these associations differ by sex, age, ethnicity and individual-level socio-economic position. Baseline data (2011–2015) from the The HEalthy LIfe in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) were used. Smoking behaviour was based on self-report. Heavy smoking was defined as smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day. Nicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerstr{\"o}m questionnaire. Geographic Information System techniques were used to construct local residential areas and to examine neighbourhood safety for these areas using micro-scale environmental data. Multilevel logistic regression analyses with 6-digit zip code area as a second level were used to assess the association between neighbourhood safety and smoking. In our study sample of 22,728 participants (18–70 years), 24.0{\%} were current smokers, 13.7{\%} were heavy smokers and 8.1{\%} were nicotine dependent individuals. Higher levels of neighbourhood safety were significantly associated with less heavy smoking (OR = 0.88, 95{\%} CI = 0.78–0.99) and less nicotine dependence (OR = 0.81, 95{\%} CI = 0.69–0.95), but not with less current smoking (OR = 1.01, 95{\%} CI = 0.91–1.11). The associations between neighbourhood safety and the three types of smoking behaviour varied by ethnicity. For instance, higher levels of neighbourhood safety were associated with less current smoking in participants of African Surinamese origin (OR = 0.71, 95{\%} CI = 0.57–0.89), but not in those of Dutch (OR = 1.13, 95{\%} CI = 0.91–1.39), South-Asian Surinamese (OR = 1.22, 95{\%} CI = 0.95–1.55), Turkish (OR = 1.08, 95{\%} CI = 0.84–1.38), Moroccan (OR = 1.53, 95{\%} CI = 1.12–2.10) or Ghanaian (OR = 1.18, 95{\%} CI = 0.47–2.94) origin. Policies that improve neighbourhood safety potentially contribute to less heavy smoking and nicotine dependence.",
keywords = "Environmental epidemiology, Geographic Information Systems, HELIUS study, Neighbourhood safety, Population subgroups, Smoking",
author = "Timmermans, {Erik J.} and Veldhuizen, {Eleonore M.} and Snijder, {Marieke B.} and Martijn Huisman and Kunst, {Anton E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.012",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "111--118",
journal = "Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0091-7435",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Neighbourhood safety and smoking in population subgroups : The HELIUS study. / Timmermans, Erik J.; Veldhuizen, Eleonore M.; Snijder, Marieke B.; Huisman, Martijn; Kunst, Anton E.

In: Preventive Medicine, Vol. 112, 01.07.2018, p. 111-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neighbourhood safety and smoking in population subgroups

T2 - The HELIUS study

AU - Timmermans, Erik J.

AU - Veldhuizen, Eleonore M.

AU - Snijder, Marieke B.

AU - Huisman, Martijn

AU - Kunst, Anton E.

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - This study examines the associations between neighbourhood safety and three types of smoking behaviour, and whether these associations differ by sex, age, ethnicity and individual-level socio-economic position. Baseline data (2011–2015) from the The HEalthy LIfe in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) were used. Smoking behaviour was based on self-report. Heavy smoking was defined as smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day. Nicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerström questionnaire. Geographic Information System techniques were used to construct local residential areas and to examine neighbourhood safety for these areas using micro-scale environmental data. Multilevel logistic regression analyses with 6-digit zip code area as a second level were used to assess the association between neighbourhood safety and smoking. In our study sample of 22,728 participants (18–70 years), 24.0% were current smokers, 13.7% were heavy smokers and 8.1% were nicotine dependent individuals. Higher levels of neighbourhood safety were significantly associated with less heavy smoking (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78–0.99) and less nicotine dependence (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69–0.95), but not with less current smoking (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.91–1.11). The associations between neighbourhood safety and the three types of smoking behaviour varied by ethnicity. For instance, higher levels of neighbourhood safety were associated with less current smoking in participants of African Surinamese origin (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57–0.89), but not in those of Dutch (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.91–1.39), South-Asian Surinamese (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.95–1.55), Turkish (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.84–1.38), Moroccan (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.12–2.10) or Ghanaian (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.47–2.94) origin. Policies that improve neighbourhood safety potentially contribute to less heavy smoking and nicotine dependence.

AB - This study examines the associations between neighbourhood safety and three types of smoking behaviour, and whether these associations differ by sex, age, ethnicity and individual-level socio-economic position. Baseline data (2011–2015) from the The HEalthy LIfe in an Urban Setting (HELIUS) study (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) were used. Smoking behaviour was based on self-report. Heavy smoking was defined as smoking ≥10 cigarettes per day. Nicotine dependence was assessed using the Fagerström questionnaire. Geographic Information System techniques were used to construct local residential areas and to examine neighbourhood safety for these areas using micro-scale environmental data. Multilevel logistic regression analyses with 6-digit zip code area as a second level were used to assess the association between neighbourhood safety and smoking. In our study sample of 22,728 participants (18–70 years), 24.0% were current smokers, 13.7% were heavy smokers and 8.1% were nicotine dependent individuals. Higher levels of neighbourhood safety were significantly associated with less heavy smoking (OR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.78–0.99) and less nicotine dependence (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.69–0.95), but not with less current smoking (OR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.91–1.11). The associations between neighbourhood safety and the three types of smoking behaviour varied by ethnicity. For instance, higher levels of neighbourhood safety were associated with less current smoking in participants of African Surinamese origin (OR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.57–0.89), but not in those of Dutch (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 0.91–1.39), South-Asian Surinamese (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.95–1.55), Turkish (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.84–1.38), Moroccan (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.12–2.10) or Ghanaian (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.47–2.94) origin. Policies that improve neighbourhood safety potentially contribute to less heavy smoking and nicotine dependence.

KW - Environmental epidemiology

KW - Geographic Information Systems

KW - HELIUS study

KW - Neighbourhood safety

KW - Population subgroups

KW - Smoking

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045553847&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.04.012

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 111

EP - 118

JO - Preventive Medicine

JF - Preventive Medicine

SN - 0091-7435

ER -