Objectively measured physical activity of hospital shift workers

Bette Loef, Allard J. Van Der Beek, Andreas Holtermann, Gerben Hulsegge, Debbie Van Baarle, Karin I. Proper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives Shift work may alter workers’ leisure-time and occupational physical activity (PA) levels, which might be one of the potential underlying mechanisms of the negative health effects of shift work. Therefore, we compared objectively measured PA levels between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Methods Data were used from Klokwerk+, a cohort study examining the health effects of shift work among healthcare workers employed in hospitals. In total, 401 shift workers and 78 non-shift workers were included, all of whom wore Actigraph GT3X accelerometers for up to seven days. Time spent sedentary, standing, walking, running, stairclimbing, and cycling during leisure time and at work was estimated using Acti4 software. Linear regression was used to compare proportions of time spent in these activities between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Results Average accelerometer wear-time was 105.9 [standard deviation (SD) 14.0] waking hours over an average of 6.9 (SD 0.6) days. No differences between hospital shift and non-shift workers were found in leisure-time PA (P>0.05). At work, shift workers were less sedentary [B=-10.6% (95% CI -14.3 -6.8)] and spent larger proportions of time standing [B=9.5% (95% CI 6.4-12.6)] and walking [B=1.2% (95% CI 0.1-2.2)] than non-shift workers. However, these differences in occupational PA became smaller when the number of night shifts during accelerometer wear-time increased. Conclusions Leisure-time PA levels of hospital shift workers were similar to those of non-shift workers, but shift workers were less sedentary and more physically active (ie, standing/walking) at work. Future research to the role of occupational activities in the health effects of shift work is recommended.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)265-273
Number of pages9
JournalScandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Cite this

@article{8605ddd448b44e7c8bf1bf038b9f3f14,
title = "Objectively measured physical activity of hospital shift workers",
abstract = "Objectives Shift work may alter workers’ leisure-time and occupational physical activity (PA) levels, which might be one of the potential underlying mechanisms of the negative health effects of shift work. Therefore, we compared objectively measured PA levels between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Methods Data were used from Klokwerk+, a cohort study examining the health effects of shift work among healthcare workers employed in hospitals. In total, 401 shift workers and 78 non-shift workers were included, all of whom wore Actigraph GT3X accelerometers for up to seven days. Time spent sedentary, standing, walking, running, stairclimbing, and cycling during leisure time and at work was estimated using Acti4 software. Linear regression was used to compare proportions of time spent in these activities between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Results Average accelerometer wear-time was 105.9 [standard deviation (SD) 14.0] waking hours over an average of 6.9 (SD 0.6) days. No differences between hospital shift and non-shift workers were found in leisure-time PA (P>0.05). At work, shift workers were less sedentary [B=-10.6{\%} (95{\%} CI -14.3 -6.8)] and spent larger proportions of time standing [B=9.5{\%} (95{\%} CI 6.4-12.6)] and walking [B=1.2{\%} (95{\%} CI 0.1-2.2)] than non-shift workers. However, these differences in occupational PA became smaller when the number of night shifts during accelerometer wear-time increased. Conclusions Leisure-time PA levels of hospital shift workers were similar to those of non-shift workers, but shift workers were less sedentary and more physically active (ie, standing/walking) at work. Future research to the role of occupational activities in the health effects of shift work is recommended.",
keywords = "Accelerometry, Healthcare worker, Hospital worker, Leisure-time physical activity, Night shift work, Night work, Objective measure, Occupational health, Occupational physical activity, Shift work, Workhour",
author = "Bette Loef and {Van Der Beek}, {Allard J.} and Andreas Holtermann and Gerben Hulsegge and {Van Baarle}, Debbie and Proper, {Karin I.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5271/sjweh.3709",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "265--273",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health",
issn = "0355-3140",
publisher = "Finnish Institute of Occupational Health",
number = "3",

}

Objectively measured physical activity of hospital shift workers. / Loef, Bette; Van Der Beek, Allard J.; Holtermann, Andreas; Hulsegge, Gerben; Van Baarle, Debbie; Proper, Karin I.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, Vol. 44, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 265-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objectively measured physical activity of hospital shift workers

AU - Loef, Bette

AU - Van Der Beek, Allard J.

AU - Holtermann, Andreas

AU - Hulsegge, Gerben

AU - Van Baarle, Debbie

AU - Proper, Karin I.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Objectives Shift work may alter workers’ leisure-time and occupational physical activity (PA) levels, which might be one of the potential underlying mechanisms of the negative health effects of shift work. Therefore, we compared objectively measured PA levels between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Methods Data were used from Klokwerk+, a cohort study examining the health effects of shift work among healthcare workers employed in hospitals. In total, 401 shift workers and 78 non-shift workers were included, all of whom wore Actigraph GT3X accelerometers for up to seven days. Time spent sedentary, standing, walking, running, stairclimbing, and cycling during leisure time and at work was estimated using Acti4 software. Linear regression was used to compare proportions of time spent in these activities between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Results Average accelerometer wear-time was 105.9 [standard deviation (SD) 14.0] waking hours over an average of 6.9 (SD 0.6) days. No differences between hospital shift and non-shift workers were found in leisure-time PA (P>0.05). At work, shift workers were less sedentary [B=-10.6% (95% CI -14.3 -6.8)] and spent larger proportions of time standing [B=9.5% (95% CI 6.4-12.6)] and walking [B=1.2% (95% CI 0.1-2.2)] than non-shift workers. However, these differences in occupational PA became smaller when the number of night shifts during accelerometer wear-time increased. Conclusions Leisure-time PA levels of hospital shift workers were similar to those of non-shift workers, but shift workers were less sedentary and more physically active (ie, standing/walking) at work. Future research to the role of occupational activities in the health effects of shift work is recommended.

AB - Objectives Shift work may alter workers’ leisure-time and occupational physical activity (PA) levels, which might be one of the potential underlying mechanisms of the negative health effects of shift work. Therefore, we compared objectively measured PA levels between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Methods Data were used from Klokwerk+, a cohort study examining the health effects of shift work among healthcare workers employed in hospitals. In total, 401 shift workers and 78 non-shift workers were included, all of whom wore Actigraph GT3X accelerometers for up to seven days. Time spent sedentary, standing, walking, running, stairclimbing, and cycling during leisure time and at work was estimated using Acti4 software. Linear regression was used to compare proportions of time spent in these activities between hospital shift and non-shift workers. Results Average accelerometer wear-time was 105.9 [standard deviation (SD) 14.0] waking hours over an average of 6.9 (SD 0.6) days. No differences between hospital shift and non-shift workers were found in leisure-time PA (P>0.05). At work, shift workers were less sedentary [B=-10.6% (95% CI -14.3 -6.8)] and spent larger proportions of time standing [B=9.5% (95% CI 6.4-12.6)] and walking [B=1.2% (95% CI 0.1-2.2)] than non-shift workers. However, these differences in occupational PA became smaller when the number of night shifts during accelerometer wear-time increased. Conclusions Leisure-time PA levels of hospital shift workers were similar to those of non-shift workers, but shift workers were less sedentary and more physically active (ie, standing/walking) at work. Future research to the role of occupational activities in the health effects of shift work is recommended.

KW - Accelerometry

KW - Healthcare worker

KW - Hospital worker

KW - Leisure-time physical activity

KW - Night shift work

KW - Night work

KW - Objective measure

KW - Occupational health

KW - Occupational physical activity

KW - Shift work

KW - Workhour

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046468485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5271/sjweh.3709

DO - 10.5271/sjweh.3709

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 265

EP - 273

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

SN - 0355-3140

IS - 3

ER -