TY - JOUR
T1 - Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Results of a Dutch Multidisciplinary Consensus Meeting
AU - Aluwini, Shafak S.
AU - Mehra, Niven
AU - Lolkema, Martijn P.
AU - Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
AU - Yakar, Derya
AU - Stoevelaar, Herman
AU - van der Poel, Henk
AU - Busstra, Martijn
AU - de Jong, Igle-Jan
AU - de Reijke, Theo
AU - de Vries, Kim
AU - Heijmink, Stijn
AU - Jenster, Guido
AU - Klaver, Sjoerd
AU - Kneppers, Jeroen
AU - Lavalaye, Jules
AU - Leyten, Gisèle
AU - Moonen, Luc
AU - Nagaraj, James
AU - Noordzij, Walter
AU - Osanto, Susanne
AU - Oving, Irma
AU - Schaake, Eva
AU - Scheenen, Tom
AU - Schoots, Ivo
AU - Sedelaar, Michiel
AU - Somford, Diederik
AU - van den Berkmortel, Franchette
AU - van der Hulle, Tom
AU - van der Voort van Zyp, Jochem
AU - van Leeuwen, Pim
AU - van Moorselaar, Jeroen
AU - van Oort, Inge
AU - Vogel, Wouter
AU - Westgeest, Hans
AU - Dutch Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer Working Group
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Background: Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is a heterogeneous disease state that is imperfectly understood, and its clinical implications are unclear. Objective: To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on biological aspects, treatment goals, and management of OMPC in daily clinical practice. Design, setting, and participants: The study comprised a modified Delphi method including an explorative survey with various statements and questions, followed by a consensus meeting to discuss and determine the agreement with revised statements and related items. The panel consisted of 34 Dutch representatives from urology, medical and radiation oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine, and basic research. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Agreement was determined with statements (five-point scale). Consensus was defined as ≥75% panel agreement with a statement. Results and limitations: Consensus existed for 56% of statements. The panel agreed that OMPC comprises a limited metastatic spread in the hormone-sensitive setting, in both the synchronous and the metachronous presentation. Limited metastatic spread was believed to involve three to five metastases and a maximum of two organs. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan was currently perceived as the most accurate diagnostic imaging modality. Although there was a consensus that targeted treatment of all metastases in OMPC will delay further dissemination of the disease, opinions on specific treatment regimens were divided. Panel outcomes were limited by the lack of scientific evidence on OMPC. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary panel reached a consensus that OMPC is a specific disease state requiring a tailored treatment approach. OMPC registries and clinical studies should focus on both the biology and the clinical parameters in relation to optimal treatment strategies in synchronous and metachronous OMPC. Patient summary: A group of Dutch medical specialists agreed that prostate cancer patients having few metastases may benefit from a new therapeutic approach. Clinical studies need to determine which treatment is best for each specific situation. A multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is a specific disease state requiring a tailored treatment approach. OMPC registries and clinical studies should provide insight into the biology and clinical parameters in relation to optimal treatment strategies in synchronous and metachronous OMPC.
AB - Background: Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is a heterogeneous disease state that is imperfectly understood, and its clinical implications are unclear. Objective: To determine the consensus of a Dutch multidisciplinary expert panel on biological aspects, treatment goals, and management of OMPC in daily clinical practice. Design, setting, and participants: The study comprised a modified Delphi method including an explorative survey with various statements and questions, followed by a consensus meeting to discuss and determine the agreement with revised statements and related items. The panel consisted of 34 Dutch representatives from urology, medical and radiation oncology, radiology, nuclear medicine, and basic research. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Agreement was determined with statements (five-point scale). Consensus was defined as ≥75% panel agreement with a statement. Results and limitations: Consensus existed for 56% of statements. The panel agreed that OMPC comprises a limited metastatic spread in the hormone-sensitive setting, in both the synchronous and the metachronous presentation. Limited metastatic spread was believed to involve three to five metastases and a maximum of two organs. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan was currently perceived as the most accurate diagnostic imaging modality. Although there was a consensus that targeted treatment of all metastases in OMPC will delay further dissemination of the disease, opinions on specific treatment regimens were divided. Panel outcomes were limited by the lack of scientific evidence on OMPC. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary panel reached a consensus that OMPC is a specific disease state requiring a tailored treatment approach. OMPC registries and clinical studies should focus on both the biology and the clinical parameters in relation to optimal treatment strategies in synchronous and metachronous OMPC. Patient summary: A group of Dutch medical specialists agreed that prostate cancer patients having few metastases may benefit from a new therapeutic approach. Clinical studies need to determine which treatment is best for each specific situation. A multidisciplinary panel reached consensus that oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC) is a specific disease state requiring a tailored treatment approach. OMPC registries and clinical studies should provide insight into the biology and clinical parameters in relation to optimal treatment strategies in synchronous and metachronous OMPC.
KW - Castration-resistant prostate cancer
KW - Consensus
KW - Hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
KW - Metastases
KW - Metastasis-directed therapy
KW - Oligometastases
KW - Oligometastatic prostate cancer
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography
KW - Recurrent prostate cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070235908&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.euo.2019.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 31401014
VL - 3
SP - 231
EP - 238
JO - European Urology Oncology
JF - European Urology Oncology
SN - 2588-9311
IS - 2
ER -