On the practice of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Practical aspects of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW) replacing manual wedges are presented and discussed extensively. A comparison between measured and calculated data is also presented. Relative dose distributions and wedge factors were calculated with a commercially available treatment planning system and measured in a water-phantom and with an ionization chamber. Wedge factor calculations and measurements were also compared with an independent method of wedge factor calculations available from the literature. Aspects of the clinical implementation, such as safety and quality assurance, were evaluated. Measurements and calculations agreed very well and were slightly better than results of previous studies. Profiles and percentage depth doses (PDDs) agreed within 1% to 1.5% and within 0.5%, respectively. Measured and calculated wedge factors ratios agreed within 0.5% to 1%. Calculated and measured EDW dose distributions showed excellent agreement, both relative and absolute. However, for safe and practical use, specific aspects need to be taken into consideration. Once the treatment planning system is commissioned properly, the clinical implementation of EDW is rather straightforward.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)13-19
Number of pages7
JournalMedical Dosimetry
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003

Cite this

@article{9a63b26ae50241fa9ea4aa9d9fb3be8b,
title = "On the practice of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges",
abstract = "Practical aspects of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW) replacing manual wedges are presented and discussed extensively. A comparison between measured and calculated data is also presented. Relative dose distributions and wedge factors were calculated with a commercially available treatment planning system and measured in a water-phantom and with an ionization chamber. Wedge factor calculations and measurements were also compared with an independent method of wedge factor calculations available from the literature. Aspects of the clinical implementation, such as safety and quality assurance, were evaluated. Measurements and calculations agreed very well and were slightly better than results of previous studies. Profiles and percentage depth doses (PDDs) agreed within 1{\%} to 1.5{\%} and within 0.5{\%}, respectively. Measured and calculated wedge factors ratios agreed within 0.5{\%} to 1{\%}. Calculated and measured EDW dose distributions showed excellent agreement, both relative and absolute. However, for safe and practical use, specific aspects need to be taken into consideration. Once the treatment planning system is commissioned properly, the clinical implementation of EDW is rather straightforward.",
keywords = "Clinical implementation, Dynamic wedge, Enhanced dynamic wedge, Treatment planning",
author = "Koken, {Phil W.} and Stan Heukelom and Cuijpers, {Johan P.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00140-1",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "13--19",
journal = "Medical Dosimetry",
issn = "0958-3947",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

On the practice of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges. / Koken, Phil W.; Heukelom, Stan; Cuijpers, Johan P.

In: Medical Dosimetry, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.01.2003, p. 13-19.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the practice of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges

AU - Koken, Phil W.

AU - Heukelom, Stan

AU - Cuijpers, Johan P.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Practical aspects of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW) replacing manual wedges are presented and discussed extensively. A comparison between measured and calculated data is also presented. Relative dose distributions and wedge factors were calculated with a commercially available treatment planning system and measured in a water-phantom and with an ionization chamber. Wedge factor calculations and measurements were also compared with an independent method of wedge factor calculations available from the literature. Aspects of the clinical implementation, such as safety and quality assurance, were evaluated. Measurements and calculations agreed very well and were slightly better than results of previous studies. Profiles and percentage depth doses (PDDs) agreed within 1% to 1.5% and within 0.5%, respectively. Measured and calculated wedge factors ratios agreed within 0.5% to 1%. Calculated and measured EDW dose distributions showed excellent agreement, both relative and absolute. However, for safe and practical use, specific aspects need to be taken into consideration. Once the treatment planning system is commissioned properly, the clinical implementation of EDW is rather straightforward.

AB - Practical aspects of the clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges (EDW) replacing manual wedges are presented and discussed extensively. A comparison between measured and calculated data is also presented. Relative dose distributions and wedge factors were calculated with a commercially available treatment planning system and measured in a water-phantom and with an ionization chamber. Wedge factor calculations and measurements were also compared with an independent method of wedge factor calculations available from the literature. Aspects of the clinical implementation, such as safety and quality assurance, were evaluated. Measurements and calculations agreed very well and were slightly better than results of previous studies. Profiles and percentage depth doses (PDDs) agreed within 1% to 1.5% and within 0.5%, respectively. Measured and calculated wedge factors ratios agreed within 0.5% to 1%. Calculated and measured EDW dose distributions showed excellent agreement, both relative and absolute. However, for safe and practical use, specific aspects need to be taken into consideration. Once the treatment planning system is commissioned properly, the clinical implementation of EDW is rather straightforward.

KW - Clinical implementation

KW - Dynamic wedge

KW - Enhanced dynamic wedge

KW - Treatment planning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037363250&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00140-1

DO - 10.1016/S0958-3947(02)00140-1

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 13

EP - 19

JO - Medical Dosimetry

JF - Medical Dosimetry

SN - 0958-3947

IS - 1

ER -