Optimal outcomes and women's positive pregnancy experience: a comparison between the World Health Organization guideline and recommendations in European national antenatal care guidelines

Laura Iannuzzi, Lucia Branchini, Jette A Clausen, Dolores Ruiz-Berdún, Patricia Gillen, Maria Healy, Katrien Beeckman, Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Ramon Escuriet Peiró, Sandra Morano, Mariarosaria Di Tommaso, Soo Downe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The publication of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on antenatal care in 2016 introduced the perspective of women as a necessary component of clinical guidelines in maternity care. WHO highlights the crucial role played by evidence-based recommendations in promoting and supporting normal birth processes and a positive experience of pregnancy. This paper aims to explore and critically appraise recommendations of national antenatal care guidelines across European countries in comparison with the WHO guideline.

METHODS: We collected guidelines from country partners of the EU COST Action IS1405. Components of the documents structure and main recommendations within and between them were compared and contrasted with the WHO guideline on antenatal care with a particular interest in exploring whether and how women's experience were included in the recommendations.

RESULTS: Eight out of eleven countries had a single national guideline on antenatal care while three countries did not. National guidelines mostly focused on care of healthy women with a straightforward pregnancy. The level of concordance between the national and the WHO recommendations varied along a continuum from almost total concordance to almost total dissonance. Women's views and experiences were accounted for in some guidelines, but mostly not placed at the same level of importance as clinical items.

CONCLUSIONS: Findings outline convergences and divergences with the WHO recommendations. They highlight the need for considering women's views more in the development of evidence-based recommendations and in practice for positive impacts on perinatal health at a global level, and on the experiences of each family.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)650-662
Number of pages13
JournalMinerva Ginecologica
Volume70
Issue number6
Early online date2 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2018

Cite this

Iannuzzi, Laura ; Branchini, Lucia ; Clausen, Jette A ; Ruiz-Berdún, Dolores ; Gillen, Patricia ; Healy, Maria ; Beeckman, Katrien ; Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Anna ; Escuriet Peiró, Ramon ; Morano, Sandra ; Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria ; Downe, Soo. / Optimal outcomes and women's positive pregnancy experience : a comparison between the World Health Organization guideline and recommendations in European national antenatal care guidelines. In: Minerva Ginecologica. 2018 ; Vol. 70, No. 6. pp. 650-662.
@article{4f8aea5c0c7a4ae0a3d989a2a62a20fd,
title = "Optimal outcomes and women's positive pregnancy experience: a comparison between the World Health Organization guideline and recommendations in European national antenatal care guidelines",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The publication of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on antenatal care in 2016 introduced the perspective of women as a necessary component of clinical guidelines in maternity care. WHO highlights the crucial role played by evidence-based recommendations in promoting and supporting normal birth processes and a positive experience of pregnancy. This paper aims to explore and critically appraise recommendations of national antenatal care guidelines across European countries in comparison with the WHO guideline.METHODS: We collected guidelines from country partners of the EU COST Action IS1405. Components of the documents structure and main recommendations within and between them were compared and contrasted with the WHO guideline on antenatal care with a particular interest in exploring whether and how women's experience were included in the recommendations.RESULTS: Eight out of eleven countries had a single national guideline on antenatal care while three countries did not. National guidelines mostly focused on care of healthy women with a straightforward pregnancy. The level of concordance between the national and the WHO recommendations varied along a continuum from almost total concordance to almost total dissonance. Women's views and experiences were accounted for in some guidelines, but mostly not placed at the same level of importance as clinical items.CONCLUSIONS: Findings outline convergences and divergences with the WHO recommendations. They highlight the need for considering women's views more in the development of evidence-based recommendations and in practice for positive impacts on perinatal health at a global level, and on the experiences of each family.",
author = "Laura Iannuzzi and Lucia Branchini and Clausen, {Jette A} and Dolores Ruiz-Berd{\'u}n and Patricia Gillen and Maria Healy and Katrien Beeckman and Anna Seijmonsbergen-Schermers and {Escuriet Peir{\'o}}, Ramon and Sandra Morano and {Di Tommaso}, Mariarosaria and Soo Downe",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
doi = "10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04301-0",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "650--662",
journal = "Minerva Ginecologica",
issn = "0026-4784",
publisher = "Edizioni Minerva Medica S.p.A.",
number = "6",

}

Optimal outcomes and women's positive pregnancy experience : a comparison between the World Health Organization guideline and recommendations in European national antenatal care guidelines. / Iannuzzi, Laura; Branchini, Lucia; Clausen, Jette A; Ruiz-Berdún, Dolores; Gillen, Patricia; Healy, Maria; Beeckman, Katrien; Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Anna; Escuriet Peiró, Ramon; Morano, Sandra; Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria; Downe, Soo.

In: Minerva Ginecologica, Vol. 70, No. 6, 12.2018, p. 650-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal outcomes and women's positive pregnancy experience

T2 - a comparison between the World Health Organization guideline and recommendations in European national antenatal care guidelines

AU - Iannuzzi, Laura

AU - Branchini, Lucia

AU - Clausen, Jette A

AU - Ruiz-Berdún, Dolores

AU - Gillen, Patricia

AU - Healy, Maria

AU - Beeckman, Katrien

AU - Seijmonsbergen-Schermers, Anna

AU - Escuriet Peiró, Ramon

AU - Morano, Sandra

AU - Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria

AU - Downe, Soo

PY - 2018/12

Y1 - 2018/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: The publication of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on antenatal care in 2016 introduced the perspective of women as a necessary component of clinical guidelines in maternity care. WHO highlights the crucial role played by evidence-based recommendations in promoting and supporting normal birth processes and a positive experience of pregnancy. This paper aims to explore and critically appraise recommendations of national antenatal care guidelines across European countries in comparison with the WHO guideline.METHODS: We collected guidelines from country partners of the EU COST Action IS1405. Components of the documents structure and main recommendations within and between them were compared and contrasted with the WHO guideline on antenatal care with a particular interest in exploring whether and how women's experience were included in the recommendations.RESULTS: Eight out of eleven countries had a single national guideline on antenatal care while three countries did not. National guidelines mostly focused on care of healthy women with a straightforward pregnancy. The level of concordance between the national and the WHO recommendations varied along a continuum from almost total concordance to almost total dissonance. Women's views and experiences were accounted for in some guidelines, but mostly not placed at the same level of importance as clinical items.CONCLUSIONS: Findings outline convergences and divergences with the WHO recommendations. They highlight the need for considering women's views more in the development of evidence-based recommendations and in practice for positive impacts on perinatal health at a global level, and on the experiences of each family.

AB - BACKGROUND: The publication of the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on antenatal care in 2016 introduced the perspective of women as a necessary component of clinical guidelines in maternity care. WHO highlights the crucial role played by evidence-based recommendations in promoting and supporting normal birth processes and a positive experience of pregnancy. This paper aims to explore and critically appraise recommendations of national antenatal care guidelines across European countries in comparison with the WHO guideline.METHODS: We collected guidelines from country partners of the EU COST Action IS1405. Components of the documents structure and main recommendations within and between them were compared and contrasted with the WHO guideline on antenatal care with a particular interest in exploring whether and how women's experience were included in the recommendations.RESULTS: Eight out of eleven countries had a single national guideline on antenatal care while three countries did not. National guidelines mostly focused on care of healthy women with a straightforward pregnancy. The level of concordance between the national and the WHO recommendations varied along a continuum from almost total concordance to almost total dissonance. Women's views and experiences were accounted for in some guidelines, but mostly not placed at the same level of importance as clinical items.CONCLUSIONS: Findings outline convergences and divergences with the WHO recommendations. They highlight the need for considering women's views more in the development of evidence-based recommendations and in practice for positive impacts on perinatal health at a global level, and on the experiences of each family.

U2 - 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04301-0

DO - 10.23736/S0026-4784.18.04301-0

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 650

EP - 662

JO - Minerva Ginecologica

JF - Minerva Ginecologica

SN - 0026-4784

IS - 6

ER -