Optimizing odor identification testing as quick and accurate diagnostic tool for Parkinson's disease

Philipp Mahlknecht, Raimund Pechlaner, Sanne Boesveldt, Dieter Volc, Bernardette Pinter, Eva Reiter, Christoph Mueller, Florian Krismer, Henk W. Berendse, Jacobus J. van Hilten, Albert Wuschitz, Wolfgang Schimetta, Birgit Hoegl, Atbin Djamshidian, Michael Nocker, Georg Goebel, Arno Gasperi, Stefan Kiechl, Johann Willeit, Werner PoeweKlaus Seppi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Introduction The aim of this study was to evaluate odor identification testing as a quick, cheap, and reliable tool to identify PD. Methods Odor identification with the 16‐item Sniffin' Sticks test (SS‐16) was assessed in a total of 646 PD patients and 606 controls from three European centers (A, B, and C), as well as 75 patients with atypical parkinsonism or essential tremor and in a prospective cohort of 24 patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (center A). Reduced odor sets most discriminative for PD were determined in a discovery cohort derived from a random split of PD patients and controls from center A using L1‐regularized logistic regression. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed in the rest of the patients/controls as validation cohorts. Results Olfactory performance was lower in PD patients compared with controls and non‐PD patients in all cohorts (each P < 0.001). Both the full SS‐16 and a subscore of the top eight discriminating odors (SS‐8) were associated with an excellent discrimination of PD from controls (areas under the curve ≥0.90; sensitivities ≥83.3%; specificities ≥82.0%) and from non‐PD patients (areas under the curve ≥0.91; sensitivities ≥84.1%; specificities ≥84.0%) in all cohorts. This remained unchanged when patients with >3 years of disease duration were excluded from analysis. All 8 incident PD cases among patients with idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder were predicted with the SS‐16 and the SS‐8 (sensitivity, 100%; positive predictive value, 61.5%). Conclusions Odor identification testing provides excellent diagnostic accuracy in the distinction of PD patients from controls and diagnostic mimics. A reduced set of eight odors could be used as a quick tool in the workup of patients presenting with parkinsonism and for PD risk indication.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1408-1413
JournalMovement Disorders
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Cite this