Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: A review of theoretical and empirical literature

Albine Moser, Rob Houtepen, Guy Widdershoven

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Title. Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: a review of theoretical and empirical literature. Aim. This paper presents a review of the theoretical and empirical literature addressing patient autonomy and how nurses can support patient autonomy. Background. Nurse-led, shared care settings provide needs-based care to patients who are encouraged to participate actively in their care. Patient autonomy is a complex ethical concept with many different meanings. As a result, nurses must solve various problems to foster patient autonomy successfully. Method. Two methods were used to identify literature for the review: (a) a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Online Contents databases and the keywords 'patient autonomy' in combination with 'nursing', and the Dutch Central Catalogue for material published from 1966 to 2005; (b) ethical and nursing literature was selected on the basis of its identification of positive and negative freedom. We reviewed qualitative empirical research to explore the patients' views of autonomy. Findings. Negative freedom emphasizes freedom of action and freedom from interference by others. Positive freedom stresses the idea that people should direct their lives according to their personal convictions and individual reasons and goals. The most prominent theories fitting negative freedom are those defining autonomy as self-governance and self-care. Theories fitting positive freedom are those focusing on autonomy in caring, autonomy as identification, autonomy as communication and autonomy as goal achievement. In the empirical literature, two studies centred on patient autonomy in home care, one in nursing home care and three in hospital settings. To achieve autonomy, patients prefer a mixed approach that combines features of negative and positive freedom. Conclusion. Nurses cannot rely exclusively on one model of autonomy to foster patient autonomy. Rather, it requires in-depth knowledge of, and interaction with, patients in the context of each particular nursing encounter because people express their autonomy through particular courses of action.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)357-365
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Advanced Nursing
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2007

Cite this

@article{243d9ab0b1024e05a0d0a71ea138e4c8,
title = "Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: A review of theoretical and empirical literature",
abstract = "Title. Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: a review of theoretical and empirical literature. Aim. This paper presents a review of the theoretical and empirical literature addressing patient autonomy and how nurses can support patient autonomy. Background. Nurse-led, shared care settings provide needs-based care to patients who are encouraged to participate actively in their care. Patient autonomy is a complex ethical concept with many different meanings. As a result, nurses must solve various problems to foster patient autonomy successfully. Method. Two methods were used to identify literature for the review: (a) a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Online Contents databases and the keywords 'patient autonomy' in combination with 'nursing', and the Dutch Central Catalogue for material published from 1966 to 2005; (b) ethical and nursing literature was selected on the basis of its identification of positive and negative freedom. We reviewed qualitative empirical research to explore the patients' views of autonomy. Findings. Negative freedom emphasizes freedom of action and freedom from interference by others. Positive freedom stresses the idea that people should direct their lives according to their personal convictions and individual reasons and goals. The most prominent theories fitting negative freedom are those defining autonomy as self-governance and self-care. Theories fitting positive freedom are those focusing on autonomy in caring, autonomy as identification, autonomy as communication and autonomy as goal achievement. In the empirical literature, two studies centred on patient autonomy in home care, one in nursing home care and three in hospital settings. To achieve autonomy, patients prefer a mixed approach that combines features of negative and positive freedom. Conclusion. Nurses cannot rely exclusively on one model of autonomy to foster patient autonomy. Rather, it requires in-depth knowledge of, and interaction with, patients in the context of each particular nursing encounter because people express their autonomy through particular courses of action.",
keywords = "Ethics, Literature review, Nurse-led care, Nursing, Patient autonomy, Shared care",
author = "Albine Moser and Rob Houtepen and Guy Widdershoven",
year = "2007",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04105.x",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "357--365",
journal = "Journal of Advanced Nursing",
issn = "0309-2402",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care : A review of theoretical and empirical literature. / Moser, Albine; Houtepen, Rob; Widdershoven, Guy.

In: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 57, No. 4, 01.02.2007, p. 357-365.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care

T2 - A review of theoretical and empirical literature

AU - Moser, Albine

AU - Houtepen, Rob

AU - Widdershoven, Guy

PY - 2007/2/1

Y1 - 2007/2/1

N2 - Title. Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: a review of theoretical and empirical literature. Aim. This paper presents a review of the theoretical and empirical literature addressing patient autonomy and how nurses can support patient autonomy. Background. Nurse-led, shared care settings provide needs-based care to patients who are encouraged to participate actively in their care. Patient autonomy is a complex ethical concept with many different meanings. As a result, nurses must solve various problems to foster patient autonomy successfully. Method. Two methods were used to identify literature for the review: (a) a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Online Contents databases and the keywords 'patient autonomy' in combination with 'nursing', and the Dutch Central Catalogue for material published from 1966 to 2005; (b) ethical and nursing literature was selected on the basis of its identification of positive and negative freedom. We reviewed qualitative empirical research to explore the patients' views of autonomy. Findings. Negative freedom emphasizes freedom of action and freedom from interference by others. Positive freedom stresses the idea that people should direct their lives according to their personal convictions and individual reasons and goals. The most prominent theories fitting negative freedom are those defining autonomy as self-governance and self-care. Theories fitting positive freedom are those focusing on autonomy in caring, autonomy as identification, autonomy as communication and autonomy as goal achievement. In the empirical literature, two studies centred on patient autonomy in home care, one in nursing home care and three in hospital settings. To achieve autonomy, patients prefer a mixed approach that combines features of negative and positive freedom. Conclusion. Nurses cannot rely exclusively on one model of autonomy to foster patient autonomy. Rather, it requires in-depth knowledge of, and interaction with, patients in the context of each particular nursing encounter because people express their autonomy through particular courses of action.

AB - Title. Patient autonomy in nurse-led shared care: a review of theoretical and empirical literature. Aim. This paper presents a review of the theoretical and empirical literature addressing patient autonomy and how nurses can support patient autonomy. Background. Nurse-led, shared care settings provide needs-based care to patients who are encouraged to participate actively in their care. Patient autonomy is a complex ethical concept with many different meanings. As a result, nurses must solve various problems to foster patient autonomy successfully. Method. Two methods were used to identify literature for the review: (a) a search of the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Online Contents databases and the keywords 'patient autonomy' in combination with 'nursing', and the Dutch Central Catalogue for material published from 1966 to 2005; (b) ethical and nursing literature was selected on the basis of its identification of positive and negative freedom. We reviewed qualitative empirical research to explore the patients' views of autonomy. Findings. Negative freedom emphasizes freedom of action and freedom from interference by others. Positive freedom stresses the idea that people should direct their lives according to their personal convictions and individual reasons and goals. The most prominent theories fitting negative freedom are those defining autonomy as self-governance and self-care. Theories fitting positive freedom are those focusing on autonomy in caring, autonomy as identification, autonomy as communication and autonomy as goal achievement. In the empirical literature, two studies centred on patient autonomy in home care, one in nursing home care and three in hospital settings. To achieve autonomy, patients prefer a mixed approach that combines features of negative and positive freedom. Conclusion. Nurses cannot rely exclusively on one model of autonomy to foster patient autonomy. Rather, it requires in-depth knowledge of, and interaction with, patients in the context of each particular nursing encounter because people express their autonomy through particular courses of action.

KW - Ethics

KW - Literature review

KW - Nurse-led care

KW - Nursing

KW - Patient autonomy

KW - Shared care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846837184&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04105.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04105.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 57

SP - 357

EP - 365

JO - Journal of Advanced Nursing

JF - Journal of Advanced Nursing

SN - 0309-2402

IS - 4

ER -