Performance on bedside tests of attention and organized thinking in patients with dementia free from delirium

Letty Oudewortel, Karlijn J Joling, Cees M P M Hertogh, Viona J M Wijnen, Anne A M van der Brug, Willem A van Gool

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjectives:Bedside tests of attention and organized thinking were performed in patients with cognitive impairment or dementia but without delirium, to provide estimates of false positive rates for detecting delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD).

DESIGN AND SETTING: This cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients and institutionalized patients without delirium representing a wide spectrum of severity of cognitive impairments.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients with dementia or a cognitive disorder according to DSM IV criteria, after exclusion of (suspected) delirium according to DSM IV criteria.

MEASUREMENTS: Tests for inattention and disorganized thinking from the CAM-ICU were assessed.

RESULTS: The sample included 163 patients (mean age 83 years (SD 6; 64% women)), with Alzheimer's disease as most prevalent (45%) diagnosis and a mean MMSE-score of 16.8 (SD 7.5). False positive rates of the test of attention varied from 0.04 in patients with normal to borderline cognitive function to 0.8 in those with severe dementia. The false positive rate of the test of disorganized thinking was zero in the normal to borderline group, increasing to 0.67 in patients with severe dementia. When combining test results false positive rates decreased to 0.03 in patients with MMSE scores above 9.

CONCLUSION: Use of simple bedside tests of attention and organized thinking for the clinical diagnosis of DSD will result in high rates of false positive observations if used regardless of the severity of dementia. However, if test results are combined they may be useful to exclude DSD in patients with minimal to moderate degrees of dementia, but not in the severe group.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-81
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Psychogeriatrics
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date23 Jul 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2019

Cite this

@article{b6328bc97aeb468aa7e45b6f4c7d6184,
title = "Performance on bedside tests of attention and organized thinking in patients with dementia free from delirium",
abstract = "ABSTRACTObjectives:Bedside tests of attention and organized thinking were performed in patients with cognitive impairment or dementia but without delirium, to provide estimates of false positive rates for detecting delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD).DESIGN AND SETTING: This cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients and institutionalized patients without delirium representing a wide spectrum of severity of cognitive impairments.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with dementia or a cognitive disorder according to DSM IV criteria, after exclusion of (suspected) delirium according to DSM IV criteria.MEASUREMENTS: Tests for inattention and disorganized thinking from the CAM-ICU were assessed.RESULTS: The sample included 163 patients (mean age 83 years (SD 6; 64{\%} women)), with Alzheimer's disease as most prevalent (45{\%}) diagnosis and a mean MMSE-score of 16.8 (SD 7.5). False positive rates of the test of attention varied from 0.04 in patients with normal to borderline cognitive function to 0.8 in those with severe dementia. The false positive rate of the test of disorganized thinking was zero in the normal to borderline group, increasing to 0.67 in patients with severe dementia. When combining test results false positive rates decreased to 0.03 in patients with MMSE scores above 9.CONCLUSION: Use of simple bedside tests of attention and organized thinking for the clinical diagnosis of DSD will result in high rates of false positive observations if used regardless of the severity of dementia. However, if test results are combined they may be useful to exclude DSD in patients with minimal to moderate degrees of dementia, but not in the severe group.",
author = "Letty Oudewortel and Joling, {Karlijn J} and Hertogh, {Cees M P M} and Wijnen, {Viona J M} and {van der Brug}, {Anne A M} and {van Gool}, {Willem A}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1041610218000522",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "73--81",
journal = "Psychogeriatrics",
issn = "1041-6102",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

Performance on bedside tests of attention and organized thinking in patients with dementia free from delirium. / Oudewortel, Letty; Joling, Karlijn J; Hertogh, Cees M P M; Wijnen, Viona J M; van der Brug, Anne A M; van Gool, Willem A.

In: International Psychogeriatrics, Vol. 31, No. 1, 01.2019, p. 73-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance on bedside tests of attention and organized thinking in patients with dementia free from delirium

AU - Oudewortel, Letty

AU - Joling, Karlijn J

AU - Hertogh, Cees M P M

AU - Wijnen, Viona J M

AU - van der Brug, Anne A M

AU - van Gool, Willem A

PY - 2019/1

Y1 - 2019/1

N2 - ABSTRACTObjectives:Bedside tests of attention and organized thinking were performed in patients with cognitive impairment or dementia but without delirium, to provide estimates of false positive rates for detecting delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD).DESIGN AND SETTING: This cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients and institutionalized patients without delirium representing a wide spectrum of severity of cognitive impairments.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with dementia or a cognitive disorder according to DSM IV criteria, after exclusion of (suspected) delirium according to DSM IV criteria.MEASUREMENTS: Tests for inattention and disorganized thinking from the CAM-ICU were assessed.RESULTS: The sample included 163 patients (mean age 83 years (SD 6; 64% women)), with Alzheimer's disease as most prevalent (45%) diagnosis and a mean MMSE-score of 16.8 (SD 7.5). False positive rates of the test of attention varied from 0.04 in patients with normal to borderline cognitive function to 0.8 in those with severe dementia. The false positive rate of the test of disorganized thinking was zero in the normal to borderline group, increasing to 0.67 in patients with severe dementia. When combining test results false positive rates decreased to 0.03 in patients with MMSE scores above 9.CONCLUSION: Use of simple bedside tests of attention and organized thinking for the clinical diagnosis of DSD will result in high rates of false positive observations if used regardless of the severity of dementia. However, if test results are combined they may be useful to exclude DSD in patients with minimal to moderate degrees of dementia, but not in the severe group.

AB - ABSTRACTObjectives:Bedside tests of attention and organized thinking were performed in patients with cognitive impairment or dementia but without delirium, to provide estimates of false positive rates for detecting delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD).DESIGN AND SETTING: This cross-sectional study was conducted in outpatients and institutionalized patients without delirium representing a wide spectrum of severity of cognitive impairments.PARTICIPANTS: Patients with dementia or a cognitive disorder according to DSM IV criteria, after exclusion of (suspected) delirium according to DSM IV criteria.MEASUREMENTS: Tests for inattention and disorganized thinking from the CAM-ICU were assessed.RESULTS: The sample included 163 patients (mean age 83 years (SD 6; 64% women)), with Alzheimer's disease as most prevalent (45%) diagnosis and a mean MMSE-score of 16.8 (SD 7.5). False positive rates of the test of attention varied from 0.04 in patients with normal to borderline cognitive function to 0.8 in those with severe dementia. The false positive rate of the test of disorganized thinking was zero in the normal to borderline group, increasing to 0.67 in patients with severe dementia. When combining test results false positive rates decreased to 0.03 in patients with MMSE scores above 9.CONCLUSION: Use of simple bedside tests of attention and organized thinking for the clinical diagnosis of DSD will result in high rates of false positive observations if used regardless of the severity of dementia. However, if test results are combined they may be useful to exclude DSD in patients with minimal to moderate degrees of dementia, but not in the severe group.

U2 - 10.1017/S1041610218000522

DO - 10.1017/S1041610218000522

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 73

EP - 81

JO - Psychogeriatrics

JF - Psychogeriatrics

SN - 1041-6102

IS - 1

ER -