TY - JOUR
T1 - Perspectives of End Users on the Potential Use of Trunk Exoskeletons for People With Low-Back Pain: A Focus Group Study
AU - Baltrusch, Saskia J.
AU - Houdijk, Han
AU - van Dieen, Jaap H.
AU - van Bennekom, Coen A. M.
AU - de Kruif, Anja J. T. C. M.
N1 - Funding Information:
For health care professionals, the optimal field of application, prevention or rehabilitation, is still under debate. Patients see potential in an exoskeleton to overcome their limitations and expect it to improve their quality of life. assistive device design requirements user-centered approach qualitative patients Horizon 2020 Framework Programme https://doi.org/10.13039/100010661 687662 edited-state corrected-proof The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Laevo for unconditionally providing the exoskeleton to be demonstrated as an example system in this study. The work presented in this paper was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 687662—SPEXOR. ORCID iD S. J. Baltrusch https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9464-6894
Funding Information:
The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Laevo for unconditionally providing the exoskeleton to be demonstrated as an example system in this study. The work presented in this paper was supported by the European Union?s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant Agreement No. 687662?SPEXOR.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/5/1
Y1 - 2020/5/1
N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to identify criteria to be considered when developing an exoskeleton for low-back pain patients by exploring the perceptions and expectations of potential end users. Background: Psychosocial, psychological, physical load, and personality influence incidence of low-back pain. Body-worn assistive devices that passively support the user’s trunk, that is exoskeletons, can decrease mechanical loading and potentially reduce low-back pain. A user-centered approach improves patient safety and health outcomes, increases user satisfaction, and ensures usability. Still, previous studies have not taken psychological factors and the early involvement of end users into account. Method: We conducted focus group studies with low-back pain patients (n = 4) and health care professionals (n = 8). Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, using the general inductive approach. The focus group discussions included trying out an available exoskeleton. Questions were designed to elicit opinions about exoskeletons, desired design specifications, and usability. Results: Important design characteristics were comfort, individual adjustability, independency in taking it on and off, and gradual adjustment of support. Patients raised concerns over loss of muscle strength. Health care professionals mentioned the risk of confirming disability of the user and increasing guarded movement in patients. Conclusion: The focus groups showed that implementation of a trunk exoskeleton to reduce low-back pain requires an adequate implementation strategy, including supervision and behavioral coaching. Application: For health care professionals, the optimal field of application, prevention or rehabilitation, is still under debate. Patients see potential in an exoskeleton to overcome their limitations and expect it to improve their quality of life.
AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to identify criteria to be considered when developing an exoskeleton for low-back pain patients by exploring the perceptions and expectations of potential end users. Background: Psychosocial, psychological, physical load, and personality influence incidence of low-back pain. Body-worn assistive devices that passively support the user’s trunk, that is exoskeletons, can decrease mechanical loading and potentially reduce low-back pain. A user-centered approach improves patient safety and health outcomes, increases user satisfaction, and ensures usability. Still, previous studies have not taken psychological factors and the early involvement of end users into account. Method: We conducted focus group studies with low-back pain patients (n = 4) and health care professionals (n = 8). Focus group sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed, using the general inductive approach. The focus group discussions included trying out an available exoskeleton. Questions were designed to elicit opinions about exoskeletons, desired design specifications, and usability. Results: Important design characteristics were comfort, individual adjustability, independency in taking it on and off, and gradual adjustment of support. Patients raised concerns over loss of muscle strength. Health care professionals mentioned the risk of confirming disability of the user and increasing guarded movement in patients. Conclusion: The focus groups showed that implementation of a trunk exoskeleton to reduce low-back pain requires an adequate implementation strategy, including supervision and behavioral coaching. Application: For health care professionals, the optimal field of application, prevention or rehabilitation, is still under debate. Patients see potential in an exoskeleton to overcome their limitations and expect it to improve their quality of life.
KW - assistive device
KW - design requirements
KW - patients
KW - qualitative
KW - user-centered approach
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85077616077&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0018720819885788
DO - 10.1177/0018720819885788
M3 - Article
C2 - 31914327
VL - 62
SP - 365
EP - 376
JO - Human Factors
JF - Human Factors
SN - 0018-7208
IS - 3
ER -