TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II Study of BEZ235 versus Everolimus in Patients with Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitor-Naïve Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
AU - Salazar, Ramon
AU - Garcia-Carbonero, Rocio
AU - Libutti, Steven K.
AU - Hendifar, Andrew E.
AU - Custodio, Ana
AU - Guimbaud, Rosine
AU - Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
AU - Ricci, Sergio
AU - Klümpen, Heinz-Josef
AU - Capdevila, Jaume
AU - Reed, Nicholas
AU - Walenkamp, Annemiek
AU - Grande, Enrique
AU - Safina, Sufiya
AU - Meyer, Tim
AU - Kong, Oliver
AU - Salomon, Herve
AU - Tavorath, Ranjana
AU - Yao, James C.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - Lessons Learned: Treatment with BEZ235 has not been shown to demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile. The hypothesis of dual targeting of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may warrant further study using other agents. Background: This phase II study investigated whether targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway via PI3K, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) inhibition using BEZ235 may be more effective than mTORC1 inhibition with everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) who are naïve to mTOR inhibitor therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced pNET were randomized (1:1) to oral BEZ235 400 mg twice daily or oral everolimus 10 mg once daily on a continuous dosing schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure. Results: Enrollment in this study was terminated early (62 enrolled of the 140 planned). The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3 to not evaluable [NE]) with BEZ235 versus 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.1–NE) with everolimus (hazard ratio 1.53; 95% CI: 0.72–3.25). The most commonly reported all-grade adverse events (>50% of patients regardless of study treatment relationship) with BEZ235 were diarrhea (90.3%), stomatitis (74.2%), and nausea (54.8%). Conclusion: BEZ235 treatment in mTOR inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced pNET did not demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile.
AB - Lessons Learned: Treatment with BEZ235 has not been shown to demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile. The hypothesis of dual targeting of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may warrant further study using other agents. Background: This phase II study investigated whether targeting the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway via PI3K, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) inhibition using BEZ235 may be more effective than mTORC1 inhibition with everolimus in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) who are naïve to mTOR inhibitor therapy. Methods: Patients with advanced pNET were randomized (1:1) to oral BEZ235 400 mg twice daily or oral everolimus 10 mg once daily on a continuous dosing schedule. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included safety, overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and time to treatment failure. Results: Enrollment in this study was terminated early (62 enrolled of the 140 planned). The median PFS was 8.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3 to not evaluable [NE]) with BEZ235 versus 10.8 months (95% CI: 8.1–NE) with everolimus (hazard ratio 1.53; 95% CI: 0.72–3.25). The most commonly reported all-grade adverse events (>50% of patients regardless of study treatment relationship) with BEZ235 were diarrhea (90.3%), stomatitis (74.2%), and nausea (54.8%). Conclusion: BEZ235 treatment in mTOR inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced pNET did not demonstrate increased efficacy compared with everolimus and may be associated with a poorer tolerability profile.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85038035232&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29242283
U2 - 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0144
DO - 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0144
M3 - Article
C2 - 29242283
VL - 23
SP - 766-e90
JO - The Oncologist
JF - The Oncologist
SN - 1083-7159
IS - 7
ER -