Pitfalls in gastrointestinal permeability measurement in ICU patients with multiple organ failure using differential sugar absorption

Heleen M. Oudemans-van Straaten*, Peter H. Van der Voort, Frans J. Hoek, Rob J. Bosman, Johan I. Van Der Spoel, Durk F. Zandstra

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Objective: To assess whether gastrointestinal permeability (GIP) at intensive care unit (ICU) admission, measured by differential sugar absorption, is related to severity of disease and multiple organ failure (MOF). Post hoc, to analyse the relation between the urinary sugar recovery and renal function. Design: Prospective observational cohort study. Setting: Eighteen-bed general ICU of a teaching hospital. Patients: Sixty-four ventilated patients admitted with MOF. Interventions: GIP was assessed within 24 h using cellobiose (C), sucrose (S) and mannitol (M) absorption. Measurements and results: Severity of disease: APACHE II and III, SAPS II and MPM II systems. Organ failure: SOFA, MODS and Goris score. The median urinary recovery of C was 0.147% (range 0.004-2.145%), of S 0.249% (0.001-3.656%) and of M 10.7% (0.6-270%). In 16 patients, M recovery was over 100% of the oral dose. They received red blood cell transfusion (RBC). In the non-transfused, the median cellobiose/mannitol (CM) ratio was 0.015 (0.0004-0.550). CM ratio was not related to severity of disease and inversely related to the SOFA score (r=-0.30, p=0.04). Post hoc regression analysis showed that recoveries of C, S and M were positively related to urinary volume. Recoveries of C and S, but not of M, were positively related to creatinine clearance. The CM ratio corrected for diuresis, but was inversely related to creatinine clearance. Conclusions: Differential C, S and M absorption testing is unreliable after RBC transfusion, since bank blood contains mannitol. The excretion of C and S, but not of M, is limited by renal dysfunction. Differential sugar absorption is not reliable to test GIP in MOF patients, since non-permeability related factors act as confounders.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)130-138
Number of pages9
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 20 Apr 2002

Cite this