Poly implant prothèse silicone breast explants: Chemical analysis of silicone gel and implant shell

Yara Bachour, Zavira Heinze, Gijs van Selms, Marco Ritt, Frank Niessen, Peter Keizers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) silicone breast implants were removed from the market between 2010 and 2012 because of the use of nonmedical grade silicone filler. The chemical and physico-chemical properties of PIP implants have been analyzed by several groups. In addition, our previous study illustrated that PIP implant shells were more permeable. Therefore, we analyzed the chemical composition of the envelope and gel of PIP silicone breast explants. Also, the composition of absorbed material into the implant was analyzed. Methods: This study was conducted on 3 PIP implants explanted from 2 patients. The envelope was analyzed using Raman microscopy, whereas the gel was analyzed using near-infrared spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Absorbed material was investigated with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results: The 3 implants appeared to be Rofil implants, and all implants displayed a yellow color. None of the envelope showed a barrier layer. Amounts of D4, D5, and D6 were found to be below 100 ppm. Water was found in all 3 implants and also proteins were absorbed into the implants. Conclusions: The current study shows that the analyzed implants originate from the manufacturer Rofil but have PIP1 hallmarks. Apparently, these are own brand labeling implants. The presence of water and proteins in the explants indicate exchange of small and large molecules into the explants, even in the implant with a visually intact envelope. Because of the PIP1 hallmarks of the Rofil implants, patients with such implants are advised to be counseled by their physicians.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere2093
JournalPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{2f78bca4e63f44099532447de9b25f2d,
title = "Poly implant proth{\`e}se silicone breast explants: Chemical analysis of silicone gel and implant shell",
abstract = "Background: Poly Implant Proth{\`e}se (PIP) silicone breast implants were removed from the market between 2010 and 2012 because of the use of nonmedical grade silicone filler. The chemical and physico-chemical properties of PIP implants have been analyzed by several groups. In addition, our previous study illustrated that PIP implant shells were more permeable. Therefore, we analyzed the chemical composition of the envelope and gel of PIP silicone breast explants. Also, the composition of absorbed material into the implant was analyzed. Methods: This study was conducted on 3 PIP implants explanted from 2 patients. The envelope was analyzed using Raman microscopy, whereas the gel was analyzed using near-infrared spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Absorbed material was investigated with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results: The 3 implants appeared to be Rofil implants, and all implants displayed a yellow color. None of the envelope showed a barrier layer. Amounts of D4, D5, and D6 were found to be below 100 ppm. Water was found in all 3 implants and also proteins were absorbed into the implants. Conclusions: The current study shows that the analyzed implants originate from the manufacturer Rofil but have PIP1 hallmarks. Apparently, these are own brand labeling implants. The presence of water and proteins in the explants indicate exchange of small and large molecules into the explants, even in the implant with a visually intact envelope. Because of the PIP1 hallmarks of the Rofil implants, patients with such implants are advised to be counseled by their physicians.",
author = "Yara Bachour and Zavira Heinze and {van Selms}, Gijs and Marco Ritt and Frank Niessen and Peter Keizers",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1097/GOX.0000000000002093",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "Plastic and reconstructive surgery.Global open",
issn = "2169-7574",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Poly implant prothèse silicone breast explants: Chemical analysis of silicone gel and implant shell. / Bachour, Yara; Heinze, Zavira; van Selms, Gijs; Ritt, Marco; Niessen, Frank; Keizers, Peter.

In: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, Vol. 7, No. 1, e2093, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Poly implant prothèse silicone breast explants: Chemical analysis of silicone gel and implant shell

AU - Bachour, Yara

AU - Heinze, Zavira

AU - van Selms, Gijs

AU - Ritt, Marco

AU - Niessen, Frank

AU - Keizers, Peter

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Background: Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) silicone breast implants were removed from the market between 2010 and 2012 because of the use of nonmedical grade silicone filler. The chemical and physico-chemical properties of PIP implants have been analyzed by several groups. In addition, our previous study illustrated that PIP implant shells were more permeable. Therefore, we analyzed the chemical composition of the envelope and gel of PIP silicone breast explants. Also, the composition of absorbed material into the implant was analyzed. Methods: This study was conducted on 3 PIP implants explanted from 2 patients. The envelope was analyzed using Raman microscopy, whereas the gel was analyzed using near-infrared spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Absorbed material was investigated with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results: The 3 implants appeared to be Rofil implants, and all implants displayed a yellow color. None of the envelope showed a barrier layer. Amounts of D4, D5, and D6 were found to be below 100 ppm. Water was found in all 3 implants and also proteins were absorbed into the implants. Conclusions: The current study shows that the analyzed implants originate from the manufacturer Rofil but have PIP1 hallmarks. Apparently, these are own brand labeling implants. The presence of water and proteins in the explants indicate exchange of small and large molecules into the explants, even in the implant with a visually intact envelope. Because of the PIP1 hallmarks of the Rofil implants, patients with such implants are advised to be counseled by their physicians.

AB - Background: Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) silicone breast implants were removed from the market between 2010 and 2012 because of the use of nonmedical grade silicone filler. The chemical and physico-chemical properties of PIP implants have been analyzed by several groups. In addition, our previous study illustrated that PIP implant shells were more permeable. Therefore, we analyzed the chemical composition of the envelope and gel of PIP silicone breast explants. Also, the composition of absorbed material into the implant was analyzed. Methods: This study was conducted on 3 PIP implants explanted from 2 patients. The envelope was analyzed using Raman microscopy, whereas the gel was analyzed using near-infrared spectra, nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. Absorbed material was investigated with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Results: The 3 implants appeared to be Rofil implants, and all implants displayed a yellow color. None of the envelope showed a barrier layer. Amounts of D4, D5, and D6 were found to be below 100 ppm. Water was found in all 3 implants and also proteins were absorbed into the implants. Conclusions: The current study shows that the analyzed implants originate from the manufacturer Rofil but have PIP1 hallmarks. Apparently, these are own brand labeling implants. The presence of water and proteins in the explants indicate exchange of small and large molecules into the explants, even in the implant with a visually intact envelope. Because of the PIP1 hallmarks of the Rofil implants, patients with such implants are advised to be counseled by their physicians.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85064879355&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002093

DO - 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002093

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery.Global open

T2 - Plastic and reconstructive surgery.Global open

JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery.Global open

SN - 2169-7574

IS - 1

M1 - e2093

ER -