TY - JOUR
T1 - Prediction of Longitudinal Cognitive Decline in Preclinical Alzheimer Disease Using Plasma Biomarkers
AU - Mattsson-Carlgren, Niklas
AU - Salvadó, Gemma
AU - Ashton, Nicholas J.
AU - Tideman, Pontus
AU - Stomrud, Erik
AU - Zetterberg, Henrik
AU - Ossenkoppele, Rik
AU - Betthauser, Tobey J.
AU - Cody, Karly Alex
AU - Jonaitis, Erin M.
AU - Langhough, Rebecca
AU - Palmqvist, Sebastian
AU - Blennow, Kaj
AU - Janelidze, Shorena
AU - Johnson, Sterling C.
AU - Hansson, Oskar
N1 - Funding Information:
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Zetterberg reported receiving personal fees as a member of the scientific advisory boards of Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, ALZpath, Annexon Biosciences, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognition Therapeutics, Denali Therapeutics, Eisai, NervGen Pharma, Novo Nordisk, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed (now Biosplice Therapeutics), Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics, and Wave Life Sciences and lecture fees from AlzeCure Pharma, Biogen, Cellectricon, Fujirebio, and Roche outside the submitted work. Dr Betthauser reported receiving grants from the Alzheimer's Association and the National Institute on Aging during the conduct of the study. Dr Jonaitis reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Koscik reported receiving grants from National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Ms Cody reported receiving grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study. Dr Palmqvist reported serving on the scientific advisory boards of and/or giving lectures at symposia sponsored by BioArctic, Biogen, Cytox, Eli Lilly and Company, Geras Solutions, and Roche. Dr Blennow reported serving as a consultant, member of the advisory board, or member of the data monitoring committee for Abcam, Axon Pharma, BioArctic, Biogen, Eli Lilly and Company, JOMDD/Shimadzu, Julius Clinical, MagQu, Novartis, Ono Pharmaceutical Company, Pharmatrophix, Prothena Corporation, Roche Diagnostics, and Siemens Healthineers and being a cofounder of Brain Biomarker Solutions, which is a part of the GU Ventures incubator program, outside the submitted work. Dr Johnson reported receiving grants from the National Institute on Aging during the conduct of the study and receiving grants from Cerveau Technologies (via his institution) and personal fees from Merck & Co, Prothena Corporation, and Roche Diagnostics outside the submitted work. Dr Hansson reported receiving grants from the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation and the Swedish Research Council and nonfinancial support from Eli Lilly and Company during the conduct of the study and receiving personal fees from Biogen, Eli Lilly and Company, and Eisai outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/4/10
Y1 - 2023/4/10
N2 - Importance: Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology starts with a prolonged phase of β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation without symptoms. The duration of this phase differs greatly among individuals. While this disease phase has high relevance for clinical trial designs, it is currently unclear how to best predict the onset of clinical progression. Objective: To evaluate combinations of different plasma biomarkers for predicting cognitive decline in Aβ-positive cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective population-based prognostic study evaluated data from 2 prospective longitudinal cohort studies (the Swedish BioFINDER-1 and the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer Prevention [WRAP]), with data collected from February 8, 2010, to October 21, 2020, for the BioFINDER-1 cohort and from August 11, 2011, to June 27, 2021, for the WRAP cohort. Participants were CU individuals recruited from memory clinics who had brain Aβ pathology defined by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/40 in the BioFINDER-1 study and by Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET) in the WRAP study. A total of 564 eligible Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative CU participants with available relevant data from the BioFINDER-1 and WRAP cohorts were included in the study; of those, 171 Aβ-positive participants were included in the main analyses. Exposures: Baseline P-tau181, P-tau217, P-tau231, glial fibrillary filament protein, and neurofilament light measured in plasma; CSF biomarkers in the BioFINDER-1 cohort, and PiB PET uptake in the WRAP cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was longitudinal measures of cognition (using the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] and the modified Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite [mPACC]) over a median of 6 years (range, 2-10 years). The secondary outcome was conversion to AD dementia. Baseline biomarkers were used in linear regression models to predict rates of longitudinal cognitive change (calculated separately). Models were adjusted for age, sex, years of education, apolipoprotein E ϵ4 allele status, and baseline cognition. Multivariable models were compared based on model R
2coefficients and corrected Akaike information criterion. Results: Among 171 Aβ-positive CU participants included in the main analyses, 119 (mean [SD] age, 73.0 [5.4] years; 60.5% female) were from the BioFINDER-1 study, and 52 (mean [SD] age, 64.4 [4.6] years; 65.4% female) were from the WRAP study. In the BioFINDER-1 cohort, plasma P-tau217 was the best marker to predict cognitive decline in the mPACC (model R
2= 0.41) and the MMSE (model R
2= 0.34) and was superior to the covariates-only models (mPACC: R
2= 0.23; MMSE: R
2= 0.04; P <.001 for both comparisons). Results were validated in the WRAP cohort; for example, plasma P-tau217 was associated with mPACC slopes (R
2= 0.13 vs 0.01 in the covariates-only model; P =.01) and MMSE slopes (R
2= 0.29 vs 0.24 in the covariates-only model; P =.046). Sparse models were identified with plasma P-tau217 as a predictor of cognitive decline. Power calculations for enrichment in hypothetical clinical trials revealed large relative reductions in sample sizes when using plasma P-tau217 to enrich for CU individuals likely to experience cognitive decline over time. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, plasma P-tau217 predicted cognitive decline in patients with preclinical AD. These findings suggest that plasma P-tau217 may be used as a complement to CSF or PET for participant selection in clinical trials of novel disease-modifying treatments..
AB - Importance: Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology starts with a prolonged phase of β-amyloid (Aβ) accumulation without symptoms. The duration of this phase differs greatly among individuals. While this disease phase has high relevance for clinical trial designs, it is currently unclear how to best predict the onset of clinical progression. Objective: To evaluate combinations of different plasma biomarkers for predicting cognitive decline in Aβ-positive cognitively unimpaired (CU) individuals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective population-based prognostic study evaluated data from 2 prospective longitudinal cohort studies (the Swedish BioFINDER-1 and the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer Prevention [WRAP]), with data collected from February 8, 2010, to October 21, 2020, for the BioFINDER-1 cohort and from August 11, 2011, to June 27, 2021, for the WRAP cohort. Participants were CU individuals recruited from memory clinics who had brain Aβ pathology defined by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ42/40 in the BioFINDER-1 study and by Pittsburgh Compound B (PiB) positron emission tomography (PET) in the WRAP study. A total of 564 eligible Aβ-positive and Aβ-negative CU participants with available relevant data from the BioFINDER-1 and WRAP cohorts were included in the study; of those, 171 Aβ-positive participants were included in the main analyses. Exposures: Baseline P-tau181, P-tau217, P-tau231, glial fibrillary filament protein, and neurofilament light measured in plasma; CSF biomarkers in the BioFINDER-1 cohort, and PiB PET uptake in the WRAP cohort. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was longitudinal measures of cognition (using the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] and the modified Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite [mPACC]) over a median of 6 years (range, 2-10 years). The secondary outcome was conversion to AD dementia. Baseline biomarkers were used in linear regression models to predict rates of longitudinal cognitive change (calculated separately). Models were adjusted for age, sex, years of education, apolipoprotein E ϵ4 allele status, and baseline cognition. Multivariable models were compared based on model R
2coefficients and corrected Akaike information criterion. Results: Among 171 Aβ-positive CU participants included in the main analyses, 119 (mean [SD] age, 73.0 [5.4] years; 60.5% female) were from the BioFINDER-1 study, and 52 (mean [SD] age, 64.4 [4.6] years; 65.4% female) were from the WRAP study. In the BioFINDER-1 cohort, plasma P-tau217 was the best marker to predict cognitive decline in the mPACC (model R
2= 0.41) and the MMSE (model R
2= 0.34) and was superior to the covariates-only models (mPACC: R
2= 0.23; MMSE: R
2= 0.04; P <.001 for both comparisons). Results were validated in the WRAP cohort; for example, plasma P-tau217 was associated with mPACC slopes (R
2= 0.13 vs 0.01 in the covariates-only model; P =.01) and MMSE slopes (R
2= 0.29 vs 0.24 in the covariates-only model; P =.046). Sparse models were identified with plasma P-tau217 as a predictor of cognitive decline. Power calculations for enrichment in hypothetical clinical trials revealed large relative reductions in sample sizes when using plasma P-tau217 to enrich for CU individuals likely to experience cognitive decline over time. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, plasma P-tau217 predicted cognitive decline in patients with preclinical AD. These findings suggest that plasma P-tau217 may be used as a complement to CSF or PET for participant selection in clinical trials of novel disease-modifying treatments..
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152148862&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5272
DO - 10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.5272
M3 - Article
C2 - 36745413
SN - 2168-6149
VL - 80
SP - 360
EP - 369
JO - JAMA Neurology
JF - JAMA Neurology
IS - 4
ER -