Prediction of Meningioma WHO Grade Using PET Findings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

K Mariam Slot, Dagmar Verbaan, Dennis R Buis, Linda J Schoonmade, Bart N M Berckel, W Peter Vandertop

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: World Health Organization (WHO) grading of meningiomas reflects recurrence rate and prognosis. Positron emission tomography (PET) investigates metabolic activity, allowing for distinction between low- and high-grade tumors. As preoperative suspicion for malignant meningioma will influence surgical strategy in terms of timing, extent of resection, and risks taken to achieve a total resection, we systematically reviewed the literature on PET-imaging in meningiomas and relate these findings to histopathological analysis.

METHODS: Searches in PubMed, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library, from inception to September 2019, included studies of patients who had undergone surgery for a histologically verified intracranial meningioma, with a PET-scan prior to surgery and description of (semi)quantitative PET values for meningiomas from two different WHO groups. Studies comparing more than 1 patient per WHO group were included in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS: Twenty-two studies (432 patients) were included. 18fluor-fluorodesoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET was mostly described to differentiate benign from malignant meningiomas. Pooled data showed differences in mean (95% CI) Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) for WHO II/III compared to WHO I of 2.51 (1.36, 3.66), and in tumor-to-normal (T/N) ratio (T/N ratio) for WHO II/III versus WHO I of .42 (.12, .73).

CONCLUSIONS: We found that SUV and T/N ratio in 18F-FDG PET may be useful to noninvasively differentiate benign from malignant meningiomas. T/N ratio seems to have a high specificity for the detection of high-grade meningiomas. Other PET tracers were studied too infrequently to draw definitive conclusions. Before treatment strategies can be adapted based on 18F-FDG PET, prospective studies in larger cohorts are warranted to validate the optimal T/N ratio cutoff point.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)6-19
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Neuroimaging
Volume31
Issue number1
Early online date2 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

Cite this