TY - JOUR
T1 - Prevalence and clinical association of MET gene overexpression and amplification in patients with NSCLC
T2 - Results from the European Thoracic Oncology Platform (ETOP) Lungscape project
AU - Bubendorf, Lukas
AU - Dafni, Urania
AU - Schöbel, Martin
AU - Finn, Stephen P.
AU - Tischler, Verena
AU - Sejda, Aleksandra
AU - Marchetti, Antonio
AU - Thunnissen, Erik
AU - Verbeken, Eric K.
AU - Warth, Arne
AU - Sansano, Irene
AU - Cheney, Richard
AU - Speel, Ernst Jan M.
AU - Nonaka, Daisuke
AU - Monkhorst, Kim
AU - Hager, Henrik
AU - Martorell, Miguel
AU - Savic, Spasenija
AU - Kerr, Keith M.
AU - Tan, Qiang
AU - Tsourti, Zoi
AU - Geiger, Thomas R.
AU - Kammler, Roswitha
AU - Schulze, Katja
AU - Das-Gupta, Ashis
AU - Shames, David
AU - Peters, Solange
AU - Stahel, Rolf A.
AU - for the Lungscape Consortium
PY - 2017/9/1
Y1 - 2017/9/1
N2 - Introduction In a well-defined NSCLC cohort of the ETOP Lungscape program, we explored the epidemiology of IHC MET overexpression and amplification, their inter-correlation, and their association to outcome. Methods Resected NSCLC were assessed for MET gene copy number (GCN) and expression using silver in-situ hybridization (SISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on TMAs in a multicenter setting. MET amplification was defined as MET/centromere ratio ≥ 2 (with average MET GCN ≥ 4), high MET GCN as CGN ≥ 5 and MET IHC+ as ≥2+ intensity in ≥50% of tumor cells. A total of 182 MET IHC+ and EGFR/KRAS WT tumors were analyzed for METex14 skipping mutation. Results MET IHC+ was found in 23.8% of 2432 patients, significantly associated with female gender, small tumor size, and adenocarcinoma histology. We observed a high inter-laboratory variability in IHC and SISH analysis. MET amplification prevailed in 4.6% and MET GCN ≥ 5 in 4.1% of 1572 patients. MET amplification and MET GCN ≥ 5 were not significantly associated with any tumor characteristics or stage. Both were significantly associated with IHC MET positivity (p < 0.001). METex14 skipping mutation prevailed in 5 of 182 (2.7%) MET IHC+ WT EGFR/KRAS NSCLC, 4 of which within the 88 adenocarcinomas (4.5%). No association of IHC MET overexpression, SISH MET amplification or high MET GCN was found with OS, RFS or TTR. Conclusion MET overexpression is found in 23.8% of surgically resected NSCLC. MET amplification prevails in 4.6% and is associated with MET overexpression. Both have no influence on prognosis. The large inter-laboratory variability in IHC highlights the challenge of MET IHC analysis in routine practice.
AB - Introduction In a well-defined NSCLC cohort of the ETOP Lungscape program, we explored the epidemiology of IHC MET overexpression and amplification, their inter-correlation, and their association to outcome. Methods Resected NSCLC were assessed for MET gene copy number (GCN) and expression using silver in-situ hybridization (SISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) on TMAs in a multicenter setting. MET amplification was defined as MET/centromere ratio ≥ 2 (with average MET GCN ≥ 4), high MET GCN as CGN ≥ 5 and MET IHC+ as ≥2+ intensity in ≥50% of tumor cells. A total of 182 MET IHC+ and EGFR/KRAS WT tumors were analyzed for METex14 skipping mutation. Results MET IHC+ was found in 23.8% of 2432 patients, significantly associated with female gender, small tumor size, and adenocarcinoma histology. We observed a high inter-laboratory variability in IHC and SISH analysis. MET amplification prevailed in 4.6% and MET GCN ≥ 5 in 4.1% of 1572 patients. MET amplification and MET GCN ≥ 5 were not significantly associated with any tumor characteristics or stage. Both were significantly associated with IHC MET positivity (p < 0.001). METex14 skipping mutation prevailed in 5 of 182 (2.7%) MET IHC+ WT EGFR/KRAS NSCLC, 4 of which within the 88 adenocarcinomas (4.5%). No association of IHC MET overexpression, SISH MET amplification or high MET GCN was found with OS, RFS or TTR. Conclusion MET overexpression is found in 23.8% of surgically resected NSCLC. MET amplification prevails in 4.6% and is associated with MET overexpression. Both have no influence on prognosis. The large inter-laboratory variability in IHC highlights the challenge of MET IHC analysis in routine practice.
KW - IHC MET overexpression
KW - MET exon14 mutation
KW - Non-small cell lung carcinoma
KW - SISH MET amplification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026542396&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.021
DO - 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.07.021
M3 - Article
C2 - 28838386
AN - SCOPUS:85026542396
VL - 111
SP - 143
EP - 149
JO - Lung Cancer
JF - Lung Cancer
SN - 0169-5002
ER -