Prognostic Significance of DNA Methylation Profiles at MRI Enhancing Tumor Recurrence: a Report from the EORTC 26091 TAVAREC Trial

Kaspar Draaisma, C. Mircea S. Tesileanu, Iris de Heer, Martin Klein, Marion Smits, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Paul M. Clement, Filip Y.F. de Vos, Antje Wick, Paul J. Mulholland, Martin J.B. Taphoorn, Michael Weller, Olivier L. Chinot, Johan M. Kros, Tina Verschuere, Corneel Coens, Vassilis Golfinopoulos, Thierry Gorlia, Ahmed Idbaih, Pierre A. RobeMartin J. van den Bent, Pim J. French*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review


Purpose: Despite recent advances in the molecular characterization of gliomas, it remains unclear which patients benefit most from which second-line treatments. The TAVAREC trial was a randomized, open-label phase II trial assessing the benefit of the addition of the angiogenesis inhibitor bevacizumab to treatment with temozolomide in patients with a first enhancing recurrence of World Health Organization grade 2 or 3 glioma without 1p/19q codeletion. We evaluated the prognostic significance of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles and copy-number variations on the TAVAREC trial samples. Experimental Design: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status was determined via Sanger sequencing and IHC. DNA methylation analysis was performed using the MethylationEPIC BeadChip (Illumina) from which 1p/19q codeletion, MGMT promoter methylation (MGMT-STP27), and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B were determined. DNA methylation classes were determined according to classifiers developed in Heidelberg and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; “Heidelberg” and “TCGA” classifier respectively). Results: DNA methylation profiles of 122 samples were successfully determined. As expected, most samples were IDH-mutant (89/122) and MGMT promotor methylated (89/122). Methylation classes were prognostic for time to progression. However, Heidelberg methylation classes determined at time of diagnosis were no longer prognostic following enhancing recurrence of the tumor. In contrast, TCGA methylation classes of primary samples remained prognostic also following enhancing recurrence. Homozygous deletions in CDKN2A/B were found in 10 of 87 IDH-mutated samples and were prognostically unfavorable at recurrence. Conclusions: DNA methylome Heidelberg classification at time of diagnosis is no longer of prognostic value at the time of enhancing recurrence. CDKN2A/B deletion status was predictive of survival from progression of IDH-mutated tumors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2440-2448
Number of pages9
JournalClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Issue number11
Early online date16 Mar 2022
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2022

Cite this