Quality of life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A narrative literature review of concepts, assessment methods and assessors

Appolonia M. Nieuwenhuijse, Dick L. Willems, Johannes B. van Goudoever, Michael A. Echteld, Erik Olsman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of concepts, methods of assessment and assessors in empirical studies on quality of life (QoL) of persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities (PIMD). Method: A narrative literature review was conducted by searching electronic databases until December 2016, and the included studies were then analysed thematically. Results: Twenty-one articles were included in the analysis. Multidimensional concepts of QoL consisting of both subjective and objective components were found, although the articles used different distinctions for each. QoL was assessed by behavioural observations or interviews/questionnaires. Family members, primary caregivers and more distant observers (or a combination of these three) determined QoL. Triangulation of assessors and methodological pluralism were used. Conclusions: This review highlighted several components of QoL in persons with PIMD, as well as challenges in researching the QoL of persons who are not able to express themselves verbally. The distinction between objective and subjective QoL was difficult to clarify, with interpretation being both inevitable and necessary. Although triangulation is seen to be good practice in QoL assessment, the role of proxies in assessing the QoL of persons with PIMD needs further investigation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-271
JournalJOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Jul 2019

Cite this

@article{7c51a98d5615481b8947e0ae129a0367,
title = "Quality of life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A narrative literature review of concepts, assessment methods and assessors",
abstract = "Background: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of concepts, methods of assessment and assessors in empirical studies on quality of life (QoL) of persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities (PIMD). Method: A narrative literature review was conducted by searching electronic databases until December 2016, and the included studies were then analysed thematically. Results: Twenty-one articles were included in the analysis. Multidimensional concepts of QoL consisting of both subjective and objective components were found, although the articles used different distinctions for each. QoL was assessed by behavioural observations or interviews/questionnaires. Family members, primary caregivers and more distant observers (or a combination of these three) determined QoL. Triangulation of assessors and methodological pluralism were used. Conclusions: This review highlighted several components of QoL in persons with PIMD, as well as challenges in researching the QoL of persons who are not able to express themselves verbally. The distinction between objective and subjective QoL was difficult to clarify, with interpretation being both inevitable and necessary. Although triangulation is seen to be good practice in QoL assessment, the role of proxies in assessing the QoL of persons with PIMD needs further investigation.",
author = "Nieuwenhuijse, {Appolonia M.} and Willems, {Dick L.} and {van Goudoever}, {Johannes B.} and Echteld, {Michael A.} and Erik Olsman",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.3109/13668250.2017.1388913",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "261--271",
journal = "JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY",
issn = "1366-8250",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

Quality of life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A narrative literature review of concepts, assessment methods and assessors. / Nieuwenhuijse, Appolonia M.; Willems, Dick L.; van Goudoever, Johannes B.; Echteld, Michael A.; Olsman, Erik.

In: JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY, Vol. 44, No. 3, 03.07.2019, p. 261-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of life of persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities: A narrative literature review of concepts, assessment methods and assessors

AU - Nieuwenhuijse, Appolonia M.

AU - Willems, Dick L.

AU - van Goudoever, Johannes B.

AU - Echteld, Michael A.

AU - Olsman, Erik

PY - 2019/7/3

Y1 - 2019/7/3

N2 - Background: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of concepts, methods of assessment and assessors in empirical studies on quality of life (QoL) of persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities (PIMD). Method: A narrative literature review was conducted by searching electronic databases until December 2016, and the included studies were then analysed thematically. Results: Twenty-one articles were included in the analysis. Multidimensional concepts of QoL consisting of both subjective and objective components were found, although the articles used different distinctions for each. QoL was assessed by behavioural observations or interviews/questionnaires. Family members, primary caregivers and more distant observers (or a combination of these three) determined QoL. Triangulation of assessors and methodological pluralism were used. Conclusions: This review highlighted several components of QoL in persons with PIMD, as well as challenges in researching the QoL of persons who are not able to express themselves verbally. The distinction between objective and subjective QoL was difficult to clarify, with interpretation being both inevitable and necessary. Although triangulation is seen to be good practice in QoL assessment, the role of proxies in assessing the QoL of persons with PIMD needs further investigation.

AB - Background: The objective of this study was to provide an overview of concepts, methods of assessment and assessors in empirical studies on quality of life (QoL) of persons with Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities (PIMD). Method: A narrative literature review was conducted by searching electronic databases until December 2016, and the included studies were then analysed thematically. Results: Twenty-one articles were included in the analysis. Multidimensional concepts of QoL consisting of both subjective and objective components were found, although the articles used different distinctions for each. QoL was assessed by behavioural observations or interviews/questionnaires. Family members, primary caregivers and more distant observers (or a combination of these three) determined QoL. Triangulation of assessors and methodological pluralism were used. Conclusions: This review highlighted several components of QoL in persons with PIMD, as well as challenges in researching the QoL of persons who are not able to express themselves verbally. The distinction between objective and subjective QoL was difficult to clarify, with interpretation being both inevitable and necessary. Although triangulation is seen to be good practice in QoL assessment, the role of proxies in assessing the QoL of persons with PIMD needs further investigation.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85063499047&origin=inward

U2 - 10.3109/13668250.2017.1388913

DO - 10.3109/13668250.2017.1388913

M3 - Review article

VL - 44

SP - 261

EP - 271

JO - JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY

JF - JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL & DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY

SN - 1366-8250

IS - 3

ER -