Reconsidering prenatal screening: an empirical-ethical approach to understand moral dilemmas as a question of personal preferences

M.E. Garcia Gonzalez, D.R.M. Timmermans, E. van Leeuwen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

126 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In contrast to most Western countries, routine offer of prenatal screening is considered problematic in the Netherlands. The main argument against offering it to every pregnant woman is that women would be brought into a moral dilemma when deciding whether to use screening or not. This paper explores whether the active offer of a prenatal screening test indeed confronts women with a moral dilemma. A qualitative study was developed, based on a randomised controlled trial that aimed to assess the decision-making process of women when confronted with a test offer. A sample of 59 women was interviewed about the different factors balanced in decision-making. Participants felt themselves caught between a need for knowledge and their unwillingness to take on responsibility. Conflict was reported between wishes, preferences and ethical views regarding parenthood; however, women did not seem to be caught in a choice between two or more ethical principles. Participants balanced the interests of the family against that of the fetus in line with their values and their personal circumstances. Therefore, we conclude that they are not so much faced with an ethical dilemma as conflicting interests. We propose that caregivers should provide the opportunity for the woman to discuss her wishes and doubts to facilitate her decision. This approach would help women to assess the meaning of testing within their parental duties towards their unborn child and their current offspring
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-414
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Medical Ethics
Volume35
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this