Reply: GnRH antagonists vs. long GnRH agonists in IVF: Significant flaws in a meta-analysis lead to invalid conclusions

C. B. Lambalk; F. R. Banga; J. A. Huirne; M. Toftager; A. Pinborg; R. Homburg; F. van der Veen; M. van Wely

doi:10.1093/humupd/dmx038

Reply: GnRH antagonists vs. long GnRH agonists in IVF: Significant flaws in a meta-analysis lead to invalid conclusions

C. B. Lambalk, F. R. Banga, J. A. Huirne, M. Toftager, A. Pinborg, R. Homburg, F. van der Veen, M. van Wely

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	243-244
Journal	Human Reproduction Update
Volume	24
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx038
Publication status	Published - 2018

Access to Document

10.1093/humupd/dmx038

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043320608&origin=inward

Cite this

Lambalk, C. B., Banga, F. R., Huirne, J. A., Toftager, M., Pinborg, A., Homburg, R., ... van Wely, M. (2018). Reply: GnRH antagonists vs. long GnRH agonists in IVF: Significant flaws in a meta-analysis lead to invalid conclusions. Human Reproduction Update, 24(2), 243-244. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmx038

@article{4bfc4930c190436ebf0182b1d31030b6,

title = "Reply: GnRH antagonists vs. long GnRH agonists in IVF: Significant flaws in a meta-analysis lead to invalid conclusions",

author = "Lambalk, {C. B.} and Banga, {F. R.} and Huirne, {J. A.} and M. Toftager and A. Pinborg and R. Homburg and {van der Veen}, F. and {van Wely}, M.",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1093/humupd/dmx038",

language = "English",

volume = "24",

pages = "243--244",

journal = "Human Reproduction Update",

issn = "1355-4786",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

number = "2",

}

Reply: GnRH antagonists vs. long GnRH agonists in IVF: Significant flaws in a meta-analysis lead to invalid conclusions. / Lambalk, C. B.; Banga, F. R.; Huirne, J. A.; Toftager, M.; Pinborg, A.; Homburg, R.; van der Veen, F.; van Wely, M.

In: Human Reproduction Update, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2018, p. 243-244.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply: GnRH antagonists vs. long GnRH agonists in IVF: Significant flaws in a meta-analysis lead to invalid conclusions

AU - Lambalk, C. B.

AU - Banga, F. R.

AU - Huirne, J. A.

AU - Toftager, M.

AU - Pinborg, A.

AU - Homburg, R.

AU - van der Veen, F.

AU - van Wely, M.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85043320608&origin=inward

U2 - 10.1093/humupd/dmx038

DO - 10.1093/humupd/dmx038

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 29300905

VL - 24

SP - 243

EP - 244

JO - Human Reproduction Update

JF - Human Reproduction Update

SN - 1355-4786

IS - 2

ER -