Respiratory muscle effort during expiration in successful and failed weaning from mechanical ventilation

Jonne Doorduin, Lisanne H. Roesthuis, Diana Jansen, Johannes G. van der Hoeven, Hieronymus W. H. van Hees, Leo M. A. Heunks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: Respiratory muscle weakness in critically ill patients is associated with difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Previous studies have mainly focused on inspiratory muscle activity during weaning; expiratory muscle activity is less well understood. The current study describes expiratory muscle activity during weaning, including tonic diaphragm activity. The authors hypothesized that expiratory muscle effort is greater in patients who fail to wean compared to those who wean successfully. Methods: Twenty adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation (more than 72 h) performed a spontaneous breathing trial. Tidal volume, transdiaphragmatic pressure, diaphragm electrical activity, and diaphragm neuromechanical efficiency were calculated on a breath-by-breath basis. Inspiratory (and expiratory) muscle efforts were calculated as the inspiratory esophageal (and expiratory gastric) pressure-time products, respectively. Results: Nine patients failed weaning. The contribution of the expiratory muscles to total respiratory muscle effort increased in the "failure" group from 13 ± 9% at onset to 24 ± 10% at the end of the breathing trial (P = 0.047); there was no increase in the "success" group. Diaphragm electrical activity (expressed as the percentage of inspiratory peak) was low at end expiration (failure, 3 ± 2%; success, 4 ± 6%) and equal between groups during the entire expiratory phase (P = 0.407). Diaphragm neuromechanical efficiency was lower in the failure versus success groups (0.38 ± 0.16 vs. 0.71 ± 0.36 cm H2O/μV; P = 0.054). Conclusions: Weaning failure (vs. success) is associated with increased effort of the expiratory muscles and impaired neuromechanical efficiency of the diaphragm but no difference in tonic activity of the diaphragm.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)490-501
JournalAnesthesiology
Volume129
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this