Responding to ambiguity, responding to change the value of a responsive approach to evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Loosely organised teams and flexible arranged programs offer a new answer to improve the practice of palliative health care. Given the ambiguity of this care concept and the innovative organisational arrangement it is possible for confusion to emerge over the goals, core activities and target groups. In such a context it is not sufficient to determine the degree to which goals have been attained because the search for goals is part of the developmental process. An evaluation of a palliative team in a Dutch health region shows that it is more appropriate to acknowledge ambiguity and to go on to facilitate the handling of ambiguity as a vital element in dynamic learning processes. The utility of a responsive approach to evaluation, methodological considerations and learning experiences are described. The article is educational for workers in the field of health care but also to scholars and practitioners in an evaluation community.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)461-470
Number of pages10
JournalEvaluation and Program planning
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2000

Cite this

@article{6910f396299c4633882aeee28ee4f354,
title = "Responding to ambiguity, responding to change the value of a responsive approach to evaluation",
abstract = "Loosely organised teams and flexible arranged programs offer a new answer to improve the practice of palliative health care. Given the ambiguity of this care concept and the innovative organisational arrangement it is possible for confusion to emerge over the goals, core activities and target groups. In such a context it is not sufficient to determine the degree to which goals have been attained because the search for goals is part of the developmental process. An evaluation of a palliative team in a Dutch health region shows that it is more appropriate to acknowledge ambiguity and to go on to facilitate the handling of ambiguity as a vital element in dynamic learning processes. The utility of a responsive approach to evaluation, methodological considerations and learning experiences are described. The article is educational for workers in the field of health care but also to scholars and practitioners in an evaluation community.",
keywords = "Ambiguity, Innovation, Learning, Organisation, Qualitative methods, Responsive evaluation",
author = "Abma, {T. A.}",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00036-7",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "461--470",
journal = "Evaluation and Program planning",
issn = "0149-7189",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

Responding to ambiguity, responding to change the value of a responsive approach to evaluation. / Abma, T. A.

In: Evaluation and Program planning, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.01.2000, p. 461-470.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Responding to ambiguity, responding to change the value of a responsive approach to evaluation

AU - Abma, T. A.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Loosely organised teams and flexible arranged programs offer a new answer to improve the practice of palliative health care. Given the ambiguity of this care concept and the innovative organisational arrangement it is possible for confusion to emerge over the goals, core activities and target groups. In such a context it is not sufficient to determine the degree to which goals have been attained because the search for goals is part of the developmental process. An evaluation of a palliative team in a Dutch health region shows that it is more appropriate to acknowledge ambiguity and to go on to facilitate the handling of ambiguity as a vital element in dynamic learning processes. The utility of a responsive approach to evaluation, methodological considerations and learning experiences are described. The article is educational for workers in the field of health care but also to scholars and practitioners in an evaluation community.

AB - Loosely organised teams and flexible arranged programs offer a new answer to improve the practice of palliative health care. Given the ambiguity of this care concept and the innovative organisational arrangement it is possible for confusion to emerge over the goals, core activities and target groups. In such a context it is not sufficient to determine the degree to which goals have been attained because the search for goals is part of the developmental process. An evaluation of a palliative team in a Dutch health region shows that it is more appropriate to acknowledge ambiguity and to go on to facilitate the handling of ambiguity as a vital element in dynamic learning processes. The utility of a responsive approach to evaluation, methodological considerations and learning experiences are described. The article is educational for workers in the field of health care but also to scholars and practitioners in an evaluation community.

KW - Ambiguity

KW - Innovation

KW - Learning

KW - Organisation

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - Responsive evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000763175&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00036-7

DO - 10.1016/S0149-7189(00)00036-7

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 461

EP - 470

JO - Evaluation and Program planning

JF - Evaluation and Program planning

SN - 0149-7189

IS - 4

ER -