TY - JOUR
T1 - Retention of subcutaneous abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis
T2 - real-world results from the ASCORE study: an international 2-year observational study
AU - Alten, Rieke
AU - Mariette, Xavier
AU - Flipo, René-Marc
AU - Caporali, Roberto
AU - Buch, Maya H.
AU - Patel, Yusuf
AU - Marsal, Sara
AU - Sanmartí, Raimon
AU - Nurmohamed, Michael T.
AU - Griffiths, Hedley
AU - Peichl, Peter
AU - Bannert, Bettina
AU - Chartier, Melanie
AU - Connolly, Sean E.
AU - Lozenski, Karissa
AU - Rauch, Christiane
N1 - Funding Information:
CR, MC, KL, and SEC are employees and shareholders of Bristol Myers Squibb. BB, YP, and PP have no competing interests. SMB declares consulting/grant/research support/speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead/Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, and UCB. MHB declares consulting/grant/research support from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. RC declares consulting and speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead/Galapagos, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. R-MF declares consulting and speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, MSD, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, and Sanofi. HG declares consulting/research support/speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead, Pfizer, and Roche. XM declares honoraria from Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB. MN declares consulting/grant/research support/speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. RS declares consulting/grant support from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Fresenius, Gebro Pharma, Gilead/Galapagos, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, and Sanofi. RA declares speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, and Roche. Consulting fees from Celltrion, Galapagos, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Novartis. Research support from Bristol Myers Squibb, Galapagos, Gilead, Novartis, and Pfizer.
Funding Information:
We thank the patients and all the investigators who participated in the study. The authors acknowledge the support of Manuela Le Bars with study concept and design. The clinical research organisation involved in the ASCORE study was inVentiv Health Clinical. Statistical analysis support was provided by Florence Mercier (Stat Process), Julia Heitzmann (Excelya), and Nicolas Billard (Excelya). Professional medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Fiona Boswell, PhD, at Caudex and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.
Funding Information:
We thank the patients and all the investigators who participated in the study. The authors acknowledge the support of Manuela Le Bars with study concept and design. The clinical research organisation involved in the ASCORE study was inVentiv Health Clinical. Statistical analysis support was provided by Florence Mercier (Stat Process), Julia Heitzmann (Excelya), and Nicolas Billard (Excelya). Professional medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Fiona Boswell, PhD, at Caudex and was funded by Bristol Myers Squibb.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate retention, efficacy, and safety of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept over 2 years in patients with moderate-to-severe RA in the Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine clinical practicE (ASCORE) study. Methods: Patients with RA who initiated SC abatacept 125 mg once weekly were enrolled in the international, observational, prospective multicentre ASCORE study into biologic-naïve or ≥ 1 prior biologic failure cohorts. Primary endpoint: abatacept retention rate at 2 years. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with good/moderate EULAR response rates based on DAS28 (ESR), low disease activity and/or remission according to DAS28 (ESR; ≤ 3.2/ < 2.6), SDAI (≤ 11/ ≤ 3.3), CDAI (≤ 10/ ≤ 2.8), and Boolean criteria. Retention rate by baseline serostatus was evaluated post hoc. Results: Overall, 47% of patients remained on abatacept for 2 years, irrespective of treatment line. Higher abatacept retention rates were associated with lower prior biologic exposure. Generally, clinical outcomes showed that the proportion of patients with low disease activity/remission was higher in biologic-naïve patients (vs biologic-failure) and similar in those with 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologic failures. In patients on treatment at 2 years, good/moderate EULAR response rates of ~ 80% were consistently noted irrespective of prior biologic exposure. Across treatment lines, retention was greater in patients with seropositive (vs seronegative) RA. Patients with rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibody single-positive RA who were bio-naïve had higher retention than patients who were bio-experienced. Conclusions: In the ASCORE study, SC abatacept retention was 47% at 2 years with good clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting. Abatacept retention and clinical response rates were higher in patients who received abatacept as an earlier- versus later-line biologic drug treatment and in those with seropositive RA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02090556.
AB - Objectives: To evaluate retention, efficacy, and safety of subcutaneous (SC) abatacept over 2 years in patients with moderate-to-severe RA in the Abatacept SubCutaneOus in Routine clinical practicE (ASCORE) study. Methods: Patients with RA who initiated SC abatacept 125 mg once weekly were enrolled in the international, observational, prospective multicentre ASCORE study into biologic-naïve or ≥ 1 prior biologic failure cohorts. Primary endpoint: abatacept retention rate at 2 years. Secondary endpoints: proportion of patients with good/moderate EULAR response rates based on DAS28 (ESR), low disease activity and/or remission according to DAS28 (ESR; ≤ 3.2/ < 2.6), SDAI (≤ 11/ ≤ 3.3), CDAI (≤ 10/ ≤ 2.8), and Boolean criteria. Retention rate by baseline serostatus was evaluated post hoc. Results: Overall, 47% of patients remained on abatacept for 2 years, irrespective of treatment line. Higher abatacept retention rates were associated with lower prior biologic exposure. Generally, clinical outcomes showed that the proportion of patients with low disease activity/remission was higher in biologic-naïve patients (vs biologic-failure) and similar in those with 1 and ≥ 2 prior biologic failures. In patients on treatment at 2 years, good/moderate EULAR response rates of ~ 80% were consistently noted irrespective of prior biologic exposure. Across treatment lines, retention was greater in patients with seropositive (vs seronegative) RA. Patients with rheumatoid factor/anti-citrullinated protein antibody single-positive RA who were bio-naïve had higher retention than patients who were bio-experienced. Conclusions: In the ASCORE study, SC abatacept retention was 47% at 2 years with good clinical outcomes and was well-tolerated in the real-world setting. Abatacept retention and clinical response rates were higher in patients who received abatacept as an earlier- versus later-line biologic drug treatment and in those with seropositive RA. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02090556.
KW - Abatacept
KW - Biological therapy
KW - Retention
KW - Rheumatoid arthritis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129746489&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10067-022-06176-1
DO - 10.1007/s10067-022-06176-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 35536413
SN - 0770-3198
VL - 41
SP - 2361
EP - 2373
JO - Clinical Rheumatology
JF - Clinical Rheumatology
IS - 8
ER -