TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk scores for outcome in bacterial meningitis
T2 - Systematic review and external validation study
AU - Bijlsma, Merijn W
AU - Brouwer, Matthijs C
AU - Bossuyt, Patrick M
AU - Heymans, Martijn W
AU - van der Ende, Arie
AU - Tanck, Michael W T
AU - van de Beek, Diederik
N1 - Copyright © 2016 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2016/11
Y1 - 2016/11
N2 - OBJECTIVES: To perform an external validation study of risk scores, identified through a systematic review, predicting outcome in community-acquired bacterial meningitis.METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles published between January 1960 and August 2014. Performance was evaluated in 2108 episodes of adult community-acquired bacterial meningitis from two nationwide prospective cohort studies by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve, calibration slope or Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and the distribution of calculated risks.FINDINGS: Nine risk scores were identified predicting death, neurological deficit or death, or unfavorable outcome at discharge in bacterial meningitis, pneumococcal meningitis and invasive meningococcal disease. Most studies had shortcomings in design, analyses, and reporting. Evaluation showed AUCs of 0.59 (0.57-0.61) and 0.74 (0.71-0.76) in bacterial meningitis, 0.67 (0.64-0.70) in pneumococcal meningitis, and 0.81 (0.73-0.90), 0.82 (0.74-0.91), 0.84 (0.75-0.93), 0.84 (0.76-0.93), 0.85 (0.75-0.95), and 0.90 (0.83-0.98) in meningococcal meningitis. Calibration curves showed adequate agreement between predicted and observed outcomes for four scores, but statistical tests indicated poor calibration of all risk scores.INTERPRETATION: One score could be recommended for the interpretation and design of bacterial meningitis studies. None of the existing scores performed well enough to recommend routine use in individual patient management.
AB - OBJECTIVES: To perform an external validation study of risk scores, identified through a systematic review, predicting outcome in community-acquired bacterial meningitis.METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles published between January 1960 and August 2014. Performance was evaluated in 2108 episodes of adult community-acquired bacterial meningitis from two nationwide prospective cohort studies by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), the calibration curve, calibration slope or Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and the distribution of calculated risks.FINDINGS: Nine risk scores were identified predicting death, neurological deficit or death, or unfavorable outcome at discharge in bacterial meningitis, pneumococcal meningitis and invasive meningococcal disease. Most studies had shortcomings in design, analyses, and reporting. Evaluation showed AUCs of 0.59 (0.57-0.61) and 0.74 (0.71-0.76) in bacterial meningitis, 0.67 (0.64-0.70) in pneumococcal meningitis, and 0.81 (0.73-0.90), 0.82 (0.74-0.91), 0.84 (0.75-0.93), 0.84 (0.76-0.93), 0.85 (0.75-0.95), and 0.90 (0.83-0.98) in meningococcal meningitis. Calibration curves showed adequate agreement between predicted and observed outcomes for four scores, but statistical tests indicated poor calibration of all risk scores.INTERPRETATION: One score could be recommended for the interpretation and design of bacterial meningitis studies. None of the existing scores performed well enough to recommend routine use in individual patient management.
KW - Area Under Curve
KW - Community-Acquired Infections/drug therapy
KW - Dexamethasone/therapeutic use
KW - Glasgow Coma Scale
KW - Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use
KW - Humans
KW - Meningitis, Bacterial/diagnosis
KW - Prognosis
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Risk Assessment/methods
KW - Risk Factors
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.08.003
DO - 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.08.003
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27519619
VL - 73
SP - 393
EP - 401
JO - The Journal of Infection
JF - The Journal of Infection
SN - 0163-4453
IS - 5
ER -