Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review

M. Diederen, J. S. M. Gommers, C. Wilkinson, D. Turnbull, B. W. J. Mol

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: It has been suggested that cervical ripening with a balloon catheter for labour induction can be done in an outpatient setting in low-risk pregnancies. Introduction of such an approach needs to be accompanied with monitoring of potential complications. Therefore the existence and frequency of any associated adverse event during cervical ripening needs to be established. Objective: To assess the complication rate during cervical ripening with balloon induction. Search strategy: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and CINAHL using keywords ‘induction of labour’, ‘cervical ripening’, ‘balloon catheter’, ‘Foley balloon’, ‘transcervical balloon’. Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies containing original data on fetal and maternal morbidity in pregnant women during cervical ripening with a balloon catheter. Only articles for which authors were able to give data for this exact time frame were included. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed independently the eligibility of included studies, extracted data and performed a quality assessment. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the estimated prevalence of the adverse events. Main results: In total 26 studies were included reporting on 8292 women. The estimated prevalence of the analysed adverse events in the random effects model was between 0.0 and 0.26%, of which ‘pain/discomfort’ had the highest prevalence. Conclusion: This study suggests the risk of adverse events during the period between insertion and expulsion of a balloon catheter in cervical ripening to be low. These data facilitate further evaluation and implementation of this procedure in an outpatient setting for low-risk pregnancies. Tweetable abstract: Balloon catheter for cervical ripening appears to be safe enough to evaluate its use in the outpatient setting.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1086-1095
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume125
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

@article{eded87f9912f45b88b5c6dd2803f495e,
title = "Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review",
abstract = "Background: It has been suggested that cervical ripening with a balloon catheter for labour induction can be done in an outpatient setting in low-risk pregnancies. Introduction of such an approach needs to be accompanied with monitoring of potential complications. Therefore the existence and frequency of any associated adverse event during cervical ripening needs to be established. Objective: To assess the complication rate during cervical ripening with balloon induction. Search strategy: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and CINAHL using keywords ‘induction of labour’, ‘cervical ripening’, ‘balloon catheter’, ‘Foley balloon’, ‘transcervical balloon’. Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies containing original data on fetal and maternal morbidity in pregnant women during cervical ripening with a balloon catheter. Only articles for which authors were able to give data for this exact time frame were included. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed independently the eligibility of included studies, extracted data and performed a quality assessment. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the estimated prevalence of the adverse events. Main results: In total 26 studies were included reporting on 8292 women. The estimated prevalence of the analysed adverse events in the random effects model was between 0.0 and 0.26{\%}, of which ‘pain/discomfort’ had the highest prevalence. Conclusion: This study suggests the risk of adverse events during the period between insertion and expulsion of a balloon catheter in cervical ripening to be low. These data facilitate further evaluation and implementation of this procedure in an outpatient setting for low-risk pregnancies. Tweetable abstract: Balloon catheter for cervical ripening appears to be safe enough to evaluate its use in the outpatient setting.",
author = "M. Diederen and Gommers, {J. S. M.} and C. Wilkinson and D. Turnbull and Mol, {B. W. J.}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1111/1471-0528.15047",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "1086--1095",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley Online Library",
number = "9",

}

Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review. / Diederen, M.; Gommers, J. S. M.; Wilkinson, C.; Turnbull, D.; Mol, B. W. J.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 125, No. 9, 2018, p. 1086-1095.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review

AU - Diederen, M.

AU - Gommers, J. S. M.

AU - Wilkinson, C.

AU - Turnbull, D.

AU - Mol, B. W. J.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: It has been suggested that cervical ripening with a balloon catheter for labour induction can be done in an outpatient setting in low-risk pregnancies. Introduction of such an approach needs to be accompanied with monitoring of potential complications. Therefore the existence and frequency of any associated adverse event during cervical ripening needs to be established. Objective: To assess the complication rate during cervical ripening with balloon induction. Search strategy: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and CINAHL using keywords ‘induction of labour’, ‘cervical ripening’, ‘balloon catheter’, ‘Foley balloon’, ‘transcervical balloon’. Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies containing original data on fetal and maternal morbidity in pregnant women during cervical ripening with a balloon catheter. Only articles for which authors were able to give data for this exact time frame were included. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed independently the eligibility of included studies, extracted data and performed a quality assessment. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the estimated prevalence of the adverse events. Main results: In total 26 studies were included reporting on 8292 women. The estimated prevalence of the analysed adverse events in the random effects model was between 0.0 and 0.26%, of which ‘pain/discomfort’ had the highest prevalence. Conclusion: This study suggests the risk of adverse events during the period between insertion and expulsion of a balloon catheter in cervical ripening to be low. These data facilitate further evaluation and implementation of this procedure in an outpatient setting for low-risk pregnancies. Tweetable abstract: Balloon catheter for cervical ripening appears to be safe enough to evaluate its use in the outpatient setting.

AB - Background: It has been suggested that cervical ripening with a balloon catheter for labour induction can be done in an outpatient setting in low-risk pregnancies. Introduction of such an approach needs to be accompanied with monitoring of potential complications. Therefore the existence and frequency of any associated adverse event during cervical ripening needs to be established. Objective: To assess the complication rate during cervical ripening with balloon induction. Search strategy: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane Collaboration and CINAHL using keywords ‘induction of labour’, ‘cervical ripening’, ‘balloon catheter’, ‘Foley balloon’, ‘transcervical balloon’. Selection criteria: We included randomized controlled trials and cohort studies containing original data on fetal and maternal morbidity in pregnant women during cervical ripening with a balloon catheter. Only articles for which authors were able to give data for this exact time frame were included. Data collection and analysis: Two reviewers assessed independently the eligibility of included studies, extracted data and performed a quality assessment. A meta-analysis was performed to calculate the estimated prevalence of the adverse events. Main results: In total 26 studies were included reporting on 8292 women. The estimated prevalence of the analysed adverse events in the random effects model was between 0.0 and 0.26%, of which ‘pain/discomfort’ had the highest prevalence. Conclusion: This study suggests the risk of adverse events during the period between insertion and expulsion of a balloon catheter in cervical ripening to be low. These data facilitate further evaluation and implementation of this procedure in an outpatient setting for low-risk pregnancies. Tweetable abstract: Balloon catheter for cervical ripening appears to be safe enough to evaluate its use in the outpatient setting.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85040240270&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29211328

U2 - 10.1111/1471-0528.15047

DO - 10.1111/1471-0528.15047

M3 - Article

VL - 125

SP - 1086

EP - 1095

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 9

ER -