TY - JOUR
T1 - Sex- and gender-sensitive public health research: an analysis of research proposals in a research institute in the Netherlands
AU - van Hagen, Lisanne Jeannine
AU - Muntinga, Maaike
AU - Appelman, Yolande
AU - Verdonk, Petra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Taking sex and gender into account in public health research is essential to optimize methodological procedures, bridge the gender gap in public health knowledge, and advance gender equality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of sex and gender considerations in public health research proposals in a Dutch research institute. We screened a random sample of 38 proposals submitted for review to the institute’s science committee between 2011 and 2016. Using the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’ Gender and Health Institute criteria for gender-sensitive research and qualitative content analysis, we assessed if, and how sex and gender were considered throughout the proposals (background, research aim, design, data collection, and analysis). Our results show that in general, both sex and gender were poorly considered. Gender was insufficiently taken into account throughout most proposals. When sex was mentioned in a proposal, its consideration was often inconsistent and fragmented. Finally, we identified common methodological pitfalls. We recommend that public health curricula and funding bodies increase their focus on implementing sex and gender in public health research, for instance through quality criteria, training programs for researchers and reviewers, and capacity building initiatives.
AB - Taking sex and gender into account in public health research is essential to optimize methodological procedures, bridge the gender gap in public health knowledge, and advance gender equality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the current status of sex and gender considerations in public health research proposals in a Dutch research institute. We screened a random sample of 38 proposals submitted for review to the institute’s science committee between 2011 and 2016. Using the Canadian Institutes of Health Research’ Gender and Health Institute criteria for gender-sensitive research and qualitative content analysis, we assessed if, and how sex and gender were considered throughout the proposals (background, research aim, design, data collection, and analysis). Our results show that in general, both sex and gender were poorly considered. Gender was insufficiently taken into account throughout most proposals. When sex was mentioned in a proposal, its consideration was often inconsistent and fragmented. Finally, we identified common methodological pitfalls. We recommend that public health curricula and funding bodies increase their focus on implementing sex and gender in public health research, for instance through quality criteria, training programs for researchers and reviewers, and capacity building initiatives.
KW - Gender
KW - public health research
KW - screening
KW - sex
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85092757498&origin=inward
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092757498&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03630242.2020.1834056
DO - 10.1080/03630242.2020.1834056
M3 - Article
C2 - 33073744
VL - 61
SP - 109
EP - 119
JO - Women and Health
JF - Women and Health
SN - 0363-0242
IS - 1
ER -