Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization

Tineke A. Abma, Tina Cook, Margaretha Rämgård, Elisabeth Kleba, Janet Harris, Nina Wallerstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Social impact, defined as an effect on society, culture, quality of life, community services, or public policy beyond academia, is widely considered as a relevant requirement for scientific research, especially in the field of health care. Traditionally, in health research, the process of knowledge transfer is rather linear and one-sided and has not recognized and integrated the expertise of practitioners and those who use services. This can lead to discrimination or disqualification of knowledge and epistemic injustice. Epidemic injustice is a situation wherein certain kinds of knowers and knowledge are not taken seriously into account to define a situation. The purpose of our article is to explore how health researchers can achieve social impact for a wide audience, involving them in a non-linear process of joint learning on urgent problems recognized by the various stakeholders in public health. In participatory health research impact is not preordained by one group of stakeholders, but the result of a process of reflection and dialog with multiple stakeholders on what counts as valuable outcomes. This knowledge mobilization and winding pathway embarked upon during such research have the potential for impact along the way as opposed to the expectation that impact will occur merely at the end of a research project. We will discuss and illustrate the merits of taking a negotiated, discursive and flexible pathway in the area of community-based health promotion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-505
Number of pages17
JournalEducational Action Research
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Aug 2017

Cite this

Abma, Tineke A. ; Cook, Tina ; Rämgård, Margaretha ; Kleba, Elisabeth ; Harris, Janet ; Wallerstein, Nina. / Social impact of participatory health research : collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. In: Educational Action Research. 2017 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 489-505.
@article{2f5f122dd438496f95613fc985a0cf86,
title = "Social impact of participatory health research: collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization",
abstract = "Social impact, defined as an effect on society, culture, quality of life, community services, or public policy beyond academia, is widely considered as a relevant requirement for scientific research, especially in the field of health care. Traditionally, in health research, the process of knowledge transfer is rather linear and one-sided and has not recognized and integrated the expertise of practitioners and those who use services. This can lead to discrimination or disqualification of knowledge and epistemic injustice. Epidemic injustice is a situation wherein certain kinds of knowers and knowledge are not taken seriously into account to define a situation. The purpose of our article is to explore how health researchers can achieve social impact for a wide audience, involving them in a non-linear process of joint learning on urgent problems recognized by the various stakeholders in public health. In participatory health research impact is not preordained by one group of stakeholders, but the result of a process of reflection and dialog with multiple stakeholders on what counts as valuable outcomes. This knowledge mobilization and winding pathway embarked upon during such research have the potential for impact along the way as opposed to the expectation that impact will occur merely at the end of a research project. We will discuss and illustrate the merits of taking a negotiated, discursive and flexible pathway in the area of community-based health promotion.",
keywords = "action research, health promotion, knowledge mobilization, knowledge transfer, participatory health research, Social impact",
author = "Abma, {Tineke A.} and Tina Cook and Margaretha R{\"a}mg{\aa}rd and Elisabeth Kleba and Janet Harris and Nina Wallerstein",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "489--505",
journal = "Educational Action Research",
issn = "0965-0792",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Social impact of participatory health research : collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization. / Abma, Tineke A.; Cook, Tina; Rämgård, Margaretha; Kleba, Elisabeth; Harris, Janet; Wallerstein, Nina.

In: Educational Action Research, Vol. 25, No. 4, 08.08.2017, p. 489-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Social impact of participatory health research

T2 - collaborative non-linear processes of knowledge mobilization

AU - Abma, Tineke A.

AU - Cook, Tina

AU - Rämgård, Margaretha

AU - Kleba, Elisabeth

AU - Harris, Janet

AU - Wallerstein, Nina

PY - 2017/8/8

Y1 - 2017/8/8

N2 - Social impact, defined as an effect on society, culture, quality of life, community services, or public policy beyond academia, is widely considered as a relevant requirement for scientific research, especially in the field of health care. Traditionally, in health research, the process of knowledge transfer is rather linear and one-sided and has not recognized and integrated the expertise of practitioners and those who use services. This can lead to discrimination or disqualification of knowledge and epistemic injustice. Epidemic injustice is a situation wherein certain kinds of knowers and knowledge are not taken seriously into account to define a situation. The purpose of our article is to explore how health researchers can achieve social impact for a wide audience, involving them in a non-linear process of joint learning on urgent problems recognized by the various stakeholders in public health. In participatory health research impact is not preordained by one group of stakeholders, but the result of a process of reflection and dialog with multiple stakeholders on what counts as valuable outcomes. This knowledge mobilization and winding pathway embarked upon during such research have the potential for impact along the way as opposed to the expectation that impact will occur merely at the end of a research project. We will discuss and illustrate the merits of taking a negotiated, discursive and flexible pathway in the area of community-based health promotion.

AB - Social impact, defined as an effect on society, culture, quality of life, community services, or public policy beyond academia, is widely considered as a relevant requirement for scientific research, especially in the field of health care. Traditionally, in health research, the process of knowledge transfer is rather linear and one-sided and has not recognized and integrated the expertise of practitioners and those who use services. This can lead to discrimination or disqualification of knowledge and epistemic injustice. Epidemic injustice is a situation wherein certain kinds of knowers and knowledge are not taken seriously into account to define a situation. The purpose of our article is to explore how health researchers can achieve social impact for a wide audience, involving them in a non-linear process of joint learning on urgent problems recognized by the various stakeholders in public health. In participatory health research impact is not preordained by one group of stakeholders, but the result of a process of reflection and dialog with multiple stakeholders on what counts as valuable outcomes. This knowledge mobilization and winding pathway embarked upon during such research have the potential for impact along the way as opposed to the expectation that impact will occur merely at the end of a research project. We will discuss and illustrate the merits of taking a negotiated, discursive and flexible pathway in the area of community-based health promotion.

KW - action research

KW - health promotion

KW - knowledge mobilization

KW - knowledge transfer

KW - participatory health research

KW - Social impact

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019747724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092

DO - 10.1080/09650792.2017.1329092

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 489

EP - 505

JO - Educational Action Research

JF - Educational Action Research

SN - 0965-0792

IS - 4

ER -