Specialized psychotherapies for adults with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Matthijs Oud, Arnoud Arntz, Marleen L. M. Hermens, Rogier Verhoef, Tim Kendall

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Objective: Borderline personality disorder affects up to 2% of the population and is associated with poor functioning, low quality of life and increased mortality. Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice, but it is unclear whether specialized psychotherapies (dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based treatment, transference-focused therapy and schema therapy) are more effective than non-specialized approaches (e.g. protocolized psychological treatment, general psychiatric management). The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of these psychotherapies. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 2017. Included randomized controlled trials were assessed on risk of bias and outcomes were meta-analyzed. Confidence in the results was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. The review has been reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 20 studies with 1375 participants were included. Specialized psychotherapies, when compared to treatment as usual or community treatment by experts, were associated with a medium effect based on moderate quality evidence on overall borderline personality disorder severity (standardized mean difference = –0.59 [95% confidence interval: –0.90, –0.28]), and dialectical behavior therapy, when compared to treatment as usual, with a small to medium effect on self-injury (standardized mean difference = –0.40 [95% confidence interval: –0.66, –0.13]). Other effect estimates were often inconclusive, mostly due to imprecision. Conclusion: There is moderate quality evidence that specialized psychotherapies are effective in reducing overall borderline personality disorder severity. However, further research should identify which patient groups profit most of the specialized therapies.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)949-961
JournalThe Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Volume52
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

Oud, Matthijs ; Arntz, Arnoud ; Hermens, Marleen L. M. ; Verhoef, Rogier ; Kendall, Tim. / Specialized psychotherapies for adults with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2018 ; Vol. 52, No. 10. pp. 949-961.
@article{331b64e7f9654346ba7eeeb7eba21891,
title = "Specialized psychotherapies for adults with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: Borderline personality disorder affects up to 2{\%} of the population and is associated with poor functioning, low quality of life and increased mortality. Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice, but it is unclear whether specialized psychotherapies (dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based treatment, transference-focused therapy and schema therapy) are more effective than non-specialized approaches (e.g. protocolized psychological treatment, general psychiatric management). The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of these psychotherapies. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 2017. Included randomized controlled trials were assessed on risk of bias and outcomes were meta-analyzed. Confidence in the results was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. The review has been reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 20 studies with 1375 participants were included. Specialized psychotherapies, when compared to treatment as usual or community treatment by experts, were associated with a medium effect based on moderate quality evidence on overall borderline personality disorder severity (standardized mean difference = –0.59 [95{\%} confidence interval: –0.90, –0.28]), and dialectical behavior therapy, when compared to treatment as usual, with a small to medium effect on self-injury (standardized mean difference = –0.40 [95{\%} confidence interval: –0.66, –0.13]). Other effect estimates were often inconclusive, mostly due to imprecision. Conclusion: There is moderate quality evidence that specialized psychotherapies are effective in reducing overall borderline personality disorder severity. However, further research should identify which patient groups profit most of the specialized therapies.",
author = "Matthijs Oud and Arnoud Arntz and Hermens, {Marleen L. M.} and Rogier Verhoef and Tim Kendall",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/0004867418791257",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "949--961",
journal = "The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry",
issn = "0004-8674",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "10",

}

Specialized psychotherapies for adults with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. / Oud, Matthijs; Arntz, Arnoud; Hermens, Marleen L. M.; Verhoef, Rogier; Kendall, Tim.

In: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 52, No. 10, 2018, p. 949-961.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specialized psychotherapies for adults with borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AU - Oud, Matthijs

AU - Arntz, Arnoud

AU - Hermens, Marleen L. M.

AU - Verhoef, Rogier

AU - Kendall, Tim

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Objective: Borderline personality disorder affects up to 2% of the population and is associated with poor functioning, low quality of life and increased mortality. Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice, but it is unclear whether specialized psychotherapies (dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based treatment, transference-focused therapy and schema therapy) are more effective than non-specialized approaches (e.g. protocolized psychological treatment, general psychiatric management). The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of these psychotherapies. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 2017. Included randomized controlled trials were assessed on risk of bias and outcomes were meta-analyzed. Confidence in the results was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. The review has been reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 20 studies with 1375 participants were included. Specialized psychotherapies, when compared to treatment as usual or community treatment by experts, were associated with a medium effect based on moderate quality evidence on overall borderline personality disorder severity (standardized mean difference = –0.59 [95% confidence interval: –0.90, –0.28]), and dialectical behavior therapy, when compared to treatment as usual, with a small to medium effect on self-injury (standardized mean difference = –0.40 [95% confidence interval: –0.66, –0.13]). Other effect estimates were often inconclusive, mostly due to imprecision. Conclusion: There is moderate quality evidence that specialized psychotherapies are effective in reducing overall borderline personality disorder severity. However, further research should identify which patient groups profit most of the specialized therapies.

AB - Objective: Borderline personality disorder affects up to 2% of the population and is associated with poor functioning, low quality of life and increased mortality. Psychotherapy is the treatment of choice, but it is unclear whether specialized psychotherapies (dialectical behavior therapy, mentalization-based treatment, transference-focused therapy and schema therapy) are more effective than non-specialized approaches (e.g. protocolized psychological treatment, general psychiatric management). The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the effectiveness of these psychotherapies. Methods: PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched from inception to November 2017. Included randomized controlled trials were assessed on risk of bias and outcomes were meta-analyzed. Confidence in the results was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation method. The review has been reported following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Results: A total of 20 studies with 1375 participants were included. Specialized psychotherapies, when compared to treatment as usual or community treatment by experts, were associated with a medium effect based on moderate quality evidence on overall borderline personality disorder severity (standardized mean difference = –0.59 [95% confidence interval: –0.90, –0.28]), and dialectical behavior therapy, when compared to treatment as usual, with a small to medium effect on self-injury (standardized mean difference = –0.40 [95% confidence interval: –0.66, –0.13]). Other effect estimates were often inconclusive, mostly due to imprecision. Conclusion: There is moderate quality evidence that specialized psychotherapies are effective in reducing overall borderline personality disorder severity. However, further research should identify which patient groups profit most of the specialized therapies.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85052562369&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091375

U2 - 10.1177/0004867418791257

DO - 10.1177/0004867418791257

M3 - Review article

VL - 52

SP - 949

EP - 961

JO - The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

JF - The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

SN - 0004-8674

IS - 10

ER -