Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: quality of systematic reviews

Cindy M A de Bot, Heleen Moed, Marjolein Y Berger, Esther Röder, Roy G van Wijk, Johannes C van der Wouden

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Systematic reviews have gained popularity as a way to combine the increasing amount of research information. This study assessed the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis in children, published since 2000. Eligible reviews were identified by searching Medline/Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from 2000 through 2008. Methodological quality was assessed using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews instrument. Ten systematic reviews were included, one of which was published in the Cochrane Library. Eight reviews gave some details about the search strategy. None of the reviews included measures to avoid selection bias. In 60% of the reviews, the methodological quality of the included studies was (partly) assessed. Four reviews pooled the results of individual studies, neglecting clinical heterogeneity. Three of the 10 reviews provided information about sources of funding or grants from industry. Of the 10 reviews, the six reviews with the highest overall score scored 5-8 points, indicating moderate quality. Systematic reviews are useful to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT in children. Although more reviews have become available, the methodological quality could be improved. SLIT for children could be promising, but methodological flaws in the reviews and individual studies are too serious to draw definite conclusions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)548-58
Number of pages11
JournalPediatric and Allergy Immunology
Volume22
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2011

Cite this

de Bot, Cindy M A ; Moed, Heleen ; Berger, Marjolein Y ; Röder, Esther ; van Wijk, Roy G ; van der Wouden, Johannes C. / Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis : quality of systematic reviews. In: Pediatric and Allergy Immunology. 2011 ; Vol. 22, No. 6. pp. 548-58.
@article{0723288bc3fc48f1af710a98fb54b253,
title = "Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis: quality of systematic reviews",
abstract = "Systematic reviews have gained popularity as a way to combine the increasing amount of research information. This study assessed the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis in children, published since 2000. Eligible reviews were identified by searching Medline/Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from 2000 through 2008. Methodological quality was assessed using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews instrument. Ten systematic reviews were included, one of which was published in the Cochrane Library. Eight reviews gave some details about the search strategy. None of the reviews included measures to avoid selection bias. In 60{\%} of the reviews, the methodological quality of the included studies was (partly) assessed. Four reviews pooled the results of individual studies, neglecting clinical heterogeneity. Three of the 10 reviews provided information about sources of funding or grants from industry. Of the 10 reviews, the six reviews with the highest overall score scored 5-8 points, indicating moderate quality. Systematic reviews are useful to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT in children. Although more reviews have become available, the methodological quality could be improved. SLIT for children could be promising, but methodological flaws in the reviews and individual studies are too serious to draw definite conclusions.",
keywords = "Administration, Sublingual, Allergens/administration & dosage, Child, Desensitization, Immunologic/methods, Humans, Hypersensitivity/prevention & control, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Review Literature as Topic, Rhinitis/prevention & control",
author = "{de Bot}, {Cindy M A} and Heleen Moed and Berger, {Marjolein Y} and Esther R{\"o}der and {van Wijk}, {Roy G} and {van der Wouden}, {Johannes C}",
note = "{\circledC} 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01165.x",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "548--58",
journal = "Pediatric and Allergy Immunology",
issn = "0905-6157",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "6",

}

Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis : quality of systematic reviews. / de Bot, Cindy M A; Moed, Heleen; Berger, Marjolein Y; Röder, Esther; van Wijk, Roy G; van der Wouden, Johannes C.

In: Pediatric and Allergy Immunology, Vol. 22, No. 6, 09.2011, p. 548-58.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sublingual immunotherapy in children with allergic rhinitis

T2 - quality of systematic reviews

AU - de Bot, Cindy M A

AU - Moed, Heleen

AU - Berger, Marjolein Y

AU - Röder, Esther

AU - van Wijk, Roy G

AU - van der Wouden, Johannes C

N1 - © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

PY - 2011/9

Y1 - 2011/9

N2 - Systematic reviews have gained popularity as a way to combine the increasing amount of research information. This study assessed the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis in children, published since 2000. Eligible reviews were identified by searching Medline/Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from 2000 through 2008. Methodological quality was assessed using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews instrument. Ten systematic reviews were included, one of which was published in the Cochrane Library. Eight reviews gave some details about the search strategy. None of the reviews included measures to avoid selection bias. In 60% of the reviews, the methodological quality of the included studies was (partly) assessed. Four reviews pooled the results of individual studies, neglecting clinical heterogeneity. Three of the 10 reviews provided information about sources of funding or grants from industry. Of the 10 reviews, the six reviews with the highest overall score scored 5-8 points, indicating moderate quality. Systematic reviews are useful to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT in children. Although more reviews have become available, the methodological quality could be improved. SLIT for children could be promising, but methodological flaws in the reviews and individual studies are too serious to draw definite conclusions.

AB - Systematic reviews have gained popularity as a way to combine the increasing amount of research information. This study assessed the quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis in children, published since 2000. Eligible reviews were identified by searching Medline/Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from 2000 through 2008. Methodological quality was assessed using the assessment of multiple systematic reviews instrument. Ten systematic reviews were included, one of which was published in the Cochrane Library. Eight reviews gave some details about the search strategy. None of the reviews included measures to avoid selection bias. In 60% of the reviews, the methodological quality of the included studies was (partly) assessed. Four reviews pooled the results of individual studies, neglecting clinical heterogeneity. Three of the 10 reviews provided information about sources of funding or grants from industry. Of the 10 reviews, the six reviews with the highest overall score scored 5-8 points, indicating moderate quality. Systematic reviews are useful to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT in children. Although more reviews have become available, the methodological quality could be improved. SLIT for children could be promising, but methodological flaws in the reviews and individual studies are too serious to draw definite conclusions.

KW - Administration, Sublingual

KW - Allergens/administration & dosage

KW - Child

KW - Desensitization, Immunologic/methods

KW - Humans

KW - Hypersensitivity/prevention & control

KW - Meta-Analysis as Topic

KW - Review Literature as Topic

KW - Rhinitis/prevention & control

U2 - 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01165.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01165.x

M3 - Review article

VL - 22

SP - 548

EP - 558

JO - Pediatric and Allergy Immunology

JF - Pediatric and Allergy Immunology

SN - 0905-6157

IS - 6

ER -