TY - JOUR
T1 - The annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer
AU - Cibula, David
AU - Dostálek, Lukáš
AU - Jarkovsky, Jiri
AU - Mom, Constantijne H.
AU - Lopez, Aldo
AU - Falconer, Henrik
AU - Fagotti, Anna
AU - Ayhan, Ali
AU - Kim, Sarah H.
AU - Isla Ortiz, David
AU - Klat, Jaroslav
AU - Obermair, Andreas
AU - Landoni, Fabio
AU - Rodriguez, Juliana
AU - Manchanda, Ranjit
AU - Kosťun, Jan
AU - dos Reis, Ricardo
AU - Meydanli, Mehmet M.
AU - Odetto, Diego
AU - Laky, Rene
AU - Zapardiel, Ignacio
AU - Weinberger, Vit
AU - Benešová, Klára
AU - Borčinová, Martina
AU - Pari, Darwin
AU - Salehi, Sahar
AU - Bizzarri, Nicolò
AU - Akilli, Huseyin
AU - Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
AU - Salcedo-Hernández, Rosa A.
AU - Javůrková, Veronika
AU - Sláma, Jiří
AU - van Lonkhuijzen, Luc R.C.W.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Charles University in Prague (UNCE 204065 and PROGRES Q28/LF1) and the NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the article or in the decision to publish the results.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Purpose: Current guidelines for surveillance strategy in cervical cancer are rigid, recommending the same strategy for all survivors. The aim of this study was to develop a robust model allowing for individualised surveillance based on a patient's risk profile. Methods: Data of 4343 early-stage patients with cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the international SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical Cancer) consortium. The Cox proportional hazards model predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was developed and internally validated. The risk score, derived from regression coefficients of the model, stratified the cohort into significantly distinctive risk groups. On its basis, the annual recurrence risk model (ARRM) was calculated. Results: Five variables were included in the prognostic model: maximal pathologic tumour diameter; tumour histotype; grade; number of positive pelvic lymph nodes; and lymphovascular space invasion. Five risk groups significantly differing in prognosis were identified with a five-year DFS of 97.5%, 94.7%, 85.2% and 63.3% in increasing risk groups, whereas a two-year DFS in the highest risk group equalled 15.4%. Based on the ARRM, the annual recurrence risk in the lowest risk group was below 1% since the beginning of follow-up and declined below 1% at years three, four and >5 in the medium-risk groups. In the whole cohort, 26% of recurrences appeared at the first year of the follow-up, 48% by year two and 78% by year five. Conclusion: The ARRM represents a potent tool for tailoring the surveillance strategy in early-stage patients with cervical cancer based on the patient's risk status and respective annual recurrence risk. It can easily be used in routine clinical settings internationally.
AB - Purpose: Current guidelines for surveillance strategy in cervical cancer are rigid, recommending the same strategy for all survivors. The aim of this study was to develop a robust model allowing for individualised surveillance based on a patient's risk profile. Methods: Data of 4343 early-stage patients with cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the international SCCAN (Surveillance in Cervical Cancer) consortium. The Cox proportional hazards model predicting disease-free survival (DFS) was developed and internally validated. The risk score, derived from regression coefficients of the model, stratified the cohort into significantly distinctive risk groups. On its basis, the annual recurrence risk model (ARRM) was calculated. Results: Five variables were included in the prognostic model: maximal pathologic tumour diameter; tumour histotype; grade; number of positive pelvic lymph nodes; and lymphovascular space invasion. Five risk groups significantly differing in prognosis were identified with a five-year DFS of 97.5%, 94.7%, 85.2% and 63.3% in increasing risk groups, whereas a two-year DFS in the highest risk group equalled 15.4%. Based on the ARRM, the annual recurrence risk in the lowest risk group was below 1% since the beginning of follow-up and declined below 1% at years three, four and >5 in the medium-risk groups. In the whole cohort, 26% of recurrences appeared at the first year of the follow-up, 48% by year two and 78% by year five. Conclusion: The ARRM represents a potent tool for tailoring the surveillance strategy in early-stage patients with cervical cancer based on the patient's risk status and respective annual recurrence risk. It can easily be used in routine clinical settings internationally.
KW - Annual recurrence risk
KW - Cervical cancer
KW - Prognostic model
KW - Surveillance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117162243&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.008
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.09.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 34666213
AN - SCOPUS:85117162243
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 158
SP - 111
EP - 122
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
ER -