TY - JOUR
T1 - The Bishop score as a predictor of labor induction success
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Kolkman, Diny G E
AU - Verhoeven, Corine J M
AU - Brinkhorst, Sophie J
AU - van der Post, Joris A M
AU - Pajkrt, Eva
AU - Opmeer, Brent C
AU - Mol, Ben Willem J
N1 - Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the Bishop score to predict the mode of delivery in women scheduled for induction of labor at term.STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to July 2009. Studies reporting on both the Bishop score and the outcome of labor in women scheduled for induction of labor at term were eligible. We used a bivariate model to estimate a summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for the outcome cesarean delivery.RESULTS: We included 40 primary articles reporting on 13,757 women. Study quality was mediocre. The sROC curve of the Bishop score in the prediction of cesarean delivery indicated a poor predictive capacity. For the prediction of cesarean delivery, the sensitivity-specificity combinations were 47%-75%, 61%-53% and 78%-44% for the Bishop scores of 4, 5, and 6, respectively. For a Bishop score below 9, the sensitivity-specificity combination was 95%-30%.CONCLUSION: The Bishop score is a poor predictor for the outcome of induced labor at term and should not be used to decide whether to induce labor or not.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of the Bishop score to predict the mode of delivery in women scheduled for induction of labor at term.STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic literature search of electronic databases from inception to July 2009. Studies reporting on both the Bishop score and the outcome of labor in women scheduled for induction of labor at term were eligible. We used a bivariate model to estimate a summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve for the outcome cesarean delivery.RESULTS: We included 40 primary articles reporting on 13,757 women. Study quality was mediocre. The sROC curve of the Bishop score in the prediction of cesarean delivery indicated a poor predictive capacity. For the prediction of cesarean delivery, the sensitivity-specificity combinations were 47%-75%, 61%-53% and 78%-44% for the Bishop scores of 4, 5, and 6, respectively. For a Bishop score below 9, the sensitivity-specificity combination was 95%-30%.CONCLUSION: The Bishop score is a poor predictor for the outcome of induced labor at term and should not be used to decide whether to induce labor or not.
KW - Cervical Ripening/physiology
KW - Cervix Uteri/physiology
KW - Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data
KW - Female
KW - Humans
KW - Labor, Induced/statistics & numerical data
KW - Physical Examination/methods
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Pregnancy
KW - ROC Curve
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Treatment Outcome
U2 - 10.1055/s-0032-1331024
DO - 10.1055/s-0032-1331024
M3 - Review article
C2 - 23283806
VL - 30
SP - 625
EP - 630
JO - American Journal of Perinatology
JF - American Journal of Perinatology
SN - 0735-1631
IS - 8
ER -