The controversy of using PGA to define remission in RA

Lilian H. D. van Tuyl, Maarten Boers

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/Letter to the editor › Academic

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	245
Journal	Nature Reviews Rheumatology
Volume	14
Issue number	4
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/nrrheum.2018.36
Publication status	Published - 2018

Cite this

@article{a5c66cb1eaee402ebd0f24d18cbfc4ec,

title = "The controversy of using PGA to define remission in RA",

author = "{van Tuyl}, {Lilian H. D.} and Maarten Boers",

year = "2018",

doi = "10.1038/nrrheum.2018.36",

language = "English",

volume = "14",

pages = "245",

journal = "Nature Reviews Rheumatology",

issn = "1759-4790",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The controversy of using PGA to define remission in RA

AU - van Tuyl, Lilian H. D.

AU - Boers, Maarten

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85044249391&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29559715

U2 - 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.36

DO - 10.1038/nrrheum.2018.36

M3 - Comment/Letter to the editor

C2 - 29559715

VL - 14

SP - 245

JO - Nature Reviews Rheumatology

JF - Nature Reviews Rheumatology

SN - 1759-4790

IS - 4

ER -