The effectiveness of an experimental treatment when compared to care as usual depends on the type of care as usual

Nicolle M H Van De Wiel, Walter Matthys*, Peggy T. Cohen-Kettenis, Gerard H. Maassen, John E. Lochman, Herman Van Engeland

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

In psychotherapy, effectiveness of an experimental treatment often is compared to care as usual. However, little if any attention has been paid to the heterogeneity of care as usual. The authors examined the effectiveness of manualized behavior therapy on school-aged disruptive behavior disordered (DBD) children in everyday clinical practice. A total of 77 DBD children (8-13 years) were randomly assigned to the Utrecht Coping Power Program (UCPP) condition or the care as usual condition. Care as usual consisted of family therapy (FT) or behavior therapy (BT). Decrease in parent-reported overt aggression was significantly larger in the UCPP condition than in the FT condition, but UCPP and BT did not differ significantly in this respect. The effect sizes of difference scores on other variables were more in favor of UCPP when compared to FT than to BT. The comparison of an experimental treatment to care as usual depends on the type of usual treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)298-312
Number of pages15
JournalBehavior Modification
Volume31
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2007

Cite this