TY - JOUR
T1 - The Efficacy of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation as Treatment for Patients With Achalasia Suffering From Persistent or Recurrent Symptoms After Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy
T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial
AU - Saleh, Caroline M. G.
AU - Familiari, Pietro
AU - Bastiaansen, Barbara A. J.
AU - Fockens, Paul
AU - Tack, Jan
AU - Boeckxstaens, Guy
AU - Bisschops, Raf
AU - Lei, Aaltje
AU - Schijven, Marlies P.
AU - Costamagna, Jan Guido
AU - Bredenoord, Albert J.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding This study was made possible with financial support from Fonds NutsOhra (FNO grant 1402-002).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Background & Aims: For patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), pneumatic dilation (PD) is the most frequently used treatment. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly being investigated as rescue therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of POEM vs PD for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM. Methods: This randomized multicenter controlled trial included patients after LHM with an Eckardt score >3 and substantial stasis (≥2 cm) on timed barium esophagogram and randomized to POEM or PD. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 and without unscheduled re-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the presence of reflux esophagitis, high-resolution manometry, and timed barium esophagogram findings. Follow-up duration was 1 year after initial treatment. Results: Ninety patients were included. POEM had a higher success rate (28 of 45 patients [62.2%]) than PD (12 of 45 patients [26.7%]; absolute difference, 35.6%; 95% CI, 16.4%–54.7%; P =.001; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09–0.54; relative risk for success, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37–3.99). Reflux esophagitis was not significantly different between POEM (12 of 35 [34.3%]) and PD (6 of 40 [15%]). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP-4) were significantly lower in the POEM group (P =.034; P =.002). Barium column height after 2 and 5 minutes was significantly less in patients treated with POEM (P =.005; P =.015). Conclusions: Among patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM, POEM resulted in a significantly higher success rate than PD, with a numerically higher incidence of grade A–B reflux esophagitis. Netherlands Trial Registry: NL4361 (NTR4501), https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID = NTR4501.
AB - Background & Aims: For patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), pneumatic dilation (PD) is the most frequently used treatment. Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is increasingly being investigated as rescue therapy. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of POEM vs PD for patients with persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM. Methods: This randomized multicenter controlled trial included patients after LHM with an Eckardt score >3 and substantial stasis (≥2 cm) on timed barium esophagogram and randomized to POEM or PD. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as an Eckardt score of ≤3 and without unscheduled re-treatment. Secondary outcomes included the presence of reflux esophagitis, high-resolution manometry, and timed barium esophagogram findings. Follow-up duration was 1 year after initial treatment. Results: Ninety patients were included. POEM had a higher success rate (28 of 45 patients [62.2%]) than PD (12 of 45 patients [26.7%]; absolute difference, 35.6%; 95% CI, 16.4%–54.7%; P =.001; odds ratio, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.09–0.54; relative risk for success, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.37–3.99). Reflux esophagitis was not significantly different between POEM (12 of 35 [34.3%]) and PD (6 of 40 [15%]). Basal lower esophageal sphincter pressure and integrated relaxation pressure (IRP-4) were significantly lower in the POEM group (P =.034; P =.002). Barium column height after 2 and 5 minutes was significantly less in patients treated with POEM (P =.005; P =.015). Conclusions: Among patients with achalasia experiencing persistent or recurrent symptoms after LHM, POEM resulted in a significantly higher success rate than PD, with a numerically higher incidence of grade A–B reflux esophagitis. Netherlands Trial Registry: NL4361 (NTR4501), https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID = NTR4501.
KW - Eckardt Score
KW - High-Resolution Manometry
KW - Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy
KW - Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy
KW - Pneumatic Dilation
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85152688753&origin=inward
UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36907524
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.048
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.02.048
M3 - Article
C2 - 36907524
SN - 0016-5085
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
ER -