The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis

W. M. Looman, I. N. Fabbricotti, J. W. Blom, A. P. D. Jansen, J. E. Lutomski, S. F. Metzelthin, R. Huijsman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Background: A fundamental issue in elderly care is targeting those older people at risk and in need of care interventions. Frailty is widely used to capture variations in health risks but there is no general consensus on the conceptualization of frailty. Indeed, there is considerable heterogeneity in the group of older people characterized as frail. This research identifies frailty profiles based on the physical, psychological, social and cognitive domains of functioning and the severity of the problems within these domains. Methods: This research was a secondary data-analysis of older persons derived from The Older Person and Informal Caregiver Minimum Dataset. Selected respondents were 60 years and older (n = 43,704; 59.6% female). The following variables were included: self-reported health, cognitive functioning, social functioning, mental health, morbidity status, and functional limitations. Using latent class analysis, the population was divided in subpopulations that were subsequently discussed in a focus group with older people for further validation. Results: We distinguished six frailty profiles: relatively healthy; mild physically frail; psychologically frail; severe physically frail; medically frail and multi-frail. The relatively healthy had limited problems across all domains. In three profiles older people mostly had singular problems in either the physical or psychological domain and the severity of the problems differed. Two remaining profiles were multidimensional with a combination of problems that extended to the social and cognitive domains. Conclusions: Our research provides an empirical base for meaningful frailty profiles. The profiles showed specific patterns underlying the problems in different domains of functioning. The heterogeneous population of frail older people has differing needs and faces different health issues that should be considered to tailor care interventions. Evaluation research of these interventions should acknowledge the heterogeneity of frailty by profiling.
Original languageEnglish
Article number84
JournalBMC Geriatrics
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Cite this

Looman, W. M., Fabbricotti, I. N., Blom, J. W., Jansen, A. P. D., Lutomski, J. E., Metzelthin, S. F., & Huijsman, R. (2018). The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis. BMC Geriatrics, 18(1), [84]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0776-5
Looman, W. M. ; Fabbricotti, I. N. ; Blom, J. W. ; Jansen, A. P. D. ; Lutomski, J. E. ; Metzelthin, S. F. ; Huijsman, R. / The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis. In: BMC Geriatrics. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{d2154b8363fa460896ab95281c007db5,
title = "The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis",
abstract = "Background: A fundamental issue in elderly care is targeting those older people at risk and in need of care interventions. Frailty is widely used to capture variations in health risks but there is no general consensus on the conceptualization of frailty. Indeed, there is considerable heterogeneity in the group of older people characterized as frail. This research identifies frailty profiles based on the physical, psychological, social and cognitive domains of functioning and the severity of the problems within these domains. Methods: This research was a secondary data-analysis of older persons derived from The Older Person and Informal Caregiver Minimum Dataset. Selected respondents were 60 years and older (n = 43,704; 59.6{\%} female). The following variables were included: self-reported health, cognitive functioning, social functioning, mental health, morbidity status, and functional limitations. Using latent class analysis, the population was divided in subpopulations that were subsequently discussed in a focus group with older people for further validation. Results: We distinguished six frailty profiles: relatively healthy; mild physically frail; psychologically frail; severe physically frail; medically frail and multi-frail. The relatively healthy had limited problems across all domains. In three profiles older people mostly had singular problems in either the physical or psychological domain and the severity of the problems differed. Two remaining profiles were multidimensional with a combination of problems that extended to the social and cognitive domains. Conclusions: Our research provides an empirical base for meaningful frailty profiles. The profiles showed specific patterns underlying the problems in different domains of functioning. The heterogeneous population of frail older people has differing needs and faces different health issues that should be considered to tailor care interventions. Evaluation research of these interventions should acknowledge the heterogeneity of frailty by profiling.",
author = "Looman, {W. M.} and Fabbricotti, {I. N.} and Blom, {J. W.} and Jansen, {A. P. D.} and Lutomski, {J. E.} and Metzelthin, {S. F.} and R. Huijsman",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1186/s12877-018-0776-5",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Geriatrics",
issn = "1471-2318",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

Looman, WM, Fabbricotti, IN, Blom, JW, Jansen, APD, Lutomski, JE, Metzelthin, SF & Huijsman, R 2018, 'The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis' BMC Geriatrics, vol. 18, no. 1, 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0776-5

The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis. / Looman, W. M.; Fabbricotti, I. N.; Blom, J. W.; Jansen, A. P. D.; Lutomski, J. E.; Metzelthin, S. F.; Huijsman, R.

In: BMC Geriatrics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 84, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis

AU - Looman, W. M.

AU - Fabbricotti, I. N.

AU - Blom, J. W.

AU - Jansen, A. P. D.

AU - Lutomski, J. E.

AU - Metzelthin, S. F.

AU - Huijsman, R.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Background: A fundamental issue in elderly care is targeting those older people at risk and in need of care interventions. Frailty is widely used to capture variations in health risks but there is no general consensus on the conceptualization of frailty. Indeed, there is considerable heterogeneity in the group of older people characterized as frail. This research identifies frailty profiles based on the physical, psychological, social and cognitive domains of functioning and the severity of the problems within these domains. Methods: This research was a secondary data-analysis of older persons derived from The Older Person and Informal Caregiver Minimum Dataset. Selected respondents were 60 years and older (n = 43,704; 59.6% female). The following variables were included: self-reported health, cognitive functioning, social functioning, mental health, morbidity status, and functional limitations. Using latent class analysis, the population was divided in subpopulations that were subsequently discussed in a focus group with older people for further validation. Results: We distinguished six frailty profiles: relatively healthy; mild physically frail; psychologically frail; severe physically frail; medically frail and multi-frail. The relatively healthy had limited problems across all domains. In three profiles older people mostly had singular problems in either the physical or psychological domain and the severity of the problems differed. Two remaining profiles were multidimensional with a combination of problems that extended to the social and cognitive domains. Conclusions: Our research provides an empirical base for meaningful frailty profiles. The profiles showed specific patterns underlying the problems in different domains of functioning. The heterogeneous population of frail older people has differing needs and faces different health issues that should be considered to tailor care interventions. Evaluation research of these interventions should acknowledge the heterogeneity of frailty by profiling.

AB - Background: A fundamental issue in elderly care is targeting those older people at risk and in need of care interventions. Frailty is widely used to capture variations in health risks but there is no general consensus on the conceptualization of frailty. Indeed, there is considerable heterogeneity in the group of older people characterized as frail. This research identifies frailty profiles based on the physical, psychological, social and cognitive domains of functioning and the severity of the problems within these domains. Methods: This research was a secondary data-analysis of older persons derived from The Older Person and Informal Caregiver Minimum Dataset. Selected respondents were 60 years and older (n = 43,704; 59.6% female). The following variables were included: self-reported health, cognitive functioning, social functioning, mental health, morbidity status, and functional limitations. Using latent class analysis, the population was divided in subpopulations that were subsequently discussed in a focus group with older people for further validation. Results: We distinguished six frailty profiles: relatively healthy; mild physically frail; psychologically frail; severe physically frail; medically frail and multi-frail. The relatively healthy had limited problems across all domains. In three profiles older people mostly had singular problems in either the physical or psychological domain and the severity of the problems differed. Two remaining profiles were multidimensional with a combination of problems that extended to the social and cognitive domains. Conclusions: Our research provides an empirical base for meaningful frailty profiles. The profiles showed specific patterns underlying the problems in different domains of functioning. The heterogeneous population of frail older people has differing needs and faces different health issues that should be considered to tailor care interventions. Evaluation research of these interventions should acknowledge the heterogeneity of frailty by profiling.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85045020946&origin=inward

UR - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29618334

U2 - 10.1186/s12877-018-0776-5

DO - 10.1186/s12877-018-0776-5

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Geriatrics

JF - BMC Geriatrics

SN - 1471-2318

IS - 1

M1 - 84

ER -

Looman WM, Fabbricotti IN, Blom JW, Jansen APD, Lutomski JE, Metzelthin SF et al. The frail older person does not exist: Development of frailty profiles with latent class analysis. BMC Geriatrics. 2018;18(1). 84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0776-5