The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands: legal notification, control and evaluation procedures

T. Smets, J.J. Bilsen, J. Cohen, M.L. Rurup, E. Keyser, L.H.J. Deliens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare current legal procedures for notifying, controlling and evaluating (NCE-procedures) euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, and to discuss the implications for a safe and controllable euthanasia practice. METHODS: We systematically studied and compared official documents relating to the Belgian and the Dutch NCE-procedures for euthanasia. RESULTS: In both countries, physicians are required to notify their cases to a review Committee, stimulating them to safeguard the quality of their euthanasia practice and to make societal control over the practice of euthanasia possible. However, the procedures in both countries differ. The main differences are that the Dutch notification and control procedures are more elaborate and transparent than the Belgian, and that the Belgian procedures are primarily anonymous, whereas the Dutch are not. Societal evaluation is made in both countries through the Committees' summary reports to Parliament. CONCLUSIONS: Transparent procedures like the Dutch may better facilitate societal control. Informing physicians about the law and the due care requirements for euthanasia, and systematic feedback about their medical actions are both pivotal to achieving efficient societal control and engendering the level of care needed when performing such far-reaching medical acts
Original languageUndefined/Unknown
Pages (from-to)181-187
JournalHealth Policy
Volume90
Issue number2-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Cite this

Smets, T. ; Bilsen, J.J. ; Cohen, J. ; Rurup, M.L. ; Keyser, E. ; Deliens, L.H.J. / The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands: legal notification, control and evaluation procedures. In: Health Policy. 2009 ; Vol. 90, No. 2-3. pp. 181-187.
@article{3e1c7f7e05994dad87823f37613a9557,
title = "The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands: legal notification, control and evaluation procedures",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare current legal procedures for notifying, controlling and evaluating (NCE-procedures) euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, and to discuss the implications for a safe and controllable euthanasia practice. METHODS: We systematically studied and compared official documents relating to the Belgian and the Dutch NCE-procedures for euthanasia. RESULTS: In both countries, physicians are required to notify their cases to a review Committee, stimulating them to safeguard the quality of their euthanasia practice and to make societal control over the practice of euthanasia possible. However, the procedures in both countries differ. The main differences are that the Dutch notification and control procedures are more elaborate and transparent than the Belgian, and that the Belgian procedures are primarily anonymous, whereas the Dutch are not. Societal evaluation is made in both countries through the Committees' summary reports to Parliament. CONCLUSIONS: Transparent procedures like the Dutch may better facilitate societal control. Informing physicians about the law and the due care requirements for euthanasia, and systematic feedback about their medical actions are both pivotal to achieving efficient societal control and engendering the level of care needed when performing such far-reaching medical acts",
author = "T. Smets and J.J. Bilsen and J. Cohen and M.L. Rurup and E. Keyser and L.H.J. Deliens",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.003",
language = "Undefined/Unknown",
volume = "90",
pages = "181--187",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands: legal notification, control and evaluation procedures. / Smets, T.; Bilsen, J.J.; Cohen, J.; Rurup, M.L.; Keyser, E.; Deliens, L.H.J.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 90, No. 2-3, 2009, p. 181-187.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The medical practice of euthanasia in Belgium and The Netherlands: legal notification, control and evaluation procedures

AU - Smets, T.

AU - Bilsen, J.J.

AU - Cohen, J.

AU - Rurup, M.L.

AU - Keyser, E.

AU - Deliens, L.H.J.

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare current legal procedures for notifying, controlling and evaluating (NCE-procedures) euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, and to discuss the implications for a safe and controllable euthanasia practice. METHODS: We systematically studied and compared official documents relating to the Belgian and the Dutch NCE-procedures for euthanasia. RESULTS: In both countries, physicians are required to notify their cases to a review Committee, stimulating them to safeguard the quality of their euthanasia practice and to make societal control over the practice of euthanasia possible. However, the procedures in both countries differ. The main differences are that the Dutch notification and control procedures are more elaborate and transparent than the Belgian, and that the Belgian procedures are primarily anonymous, whereas the Dutch are not. Societal evaluation is made in both countries through the Committees' summary reports to Parliament. CONCLUSIONS: Transparent procedures like the Dutch may better facilitate societal control. Informing physicians about the law and the due care requirements for euthanasia, and systematic feedback about their medical actions are both pivotal to achieving efficient societal control and engendering the level of care needed when performing such far-reaching medical acts

AB - OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare current legal procedures for notifying, controlling and evaluating (NCE-procedures) euthanasia in Belgium and the Netherlands, and to discuss the implications for a safe and controllable euthanasia practice. METHODS: We systematically studied and compared official documents relating to the Belgian and the Dutch NCE-procedures for euthanasia. RESULTS: In both countries, physicians are required to notify their cases to a review Committee, stimulating them to safeguard the quality of their euthanasia practice and to make societal control over the practice of euthanasia possible. However, the procedures in both countries differ. The main differences are that the Dutch notification and control procedures are more elaborate and transparent than the Belgian, and that the Belgian procedures are primarily anonymous, whereas the Dutch are not. Societal evaluation is made in both countries through the Committees' summary reports to Parliament. CONCLUSIONS: Transparent procedures like the Dutch may better facilitate societal control. Informing physicians about the law and the due care requirements for euthanasia, and systematic feedback about their medical actions are both pivotal to achieving efficient societal control and engendering the level of care needed when performing such far-reaching medical acts

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.003

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.10.003

M3 - Article

VL - 90

SP - 181

EP - 187

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 2-3

ER -