The practice and politics of responsive evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Responsive evaluation offers a perspective in which evaluation is reframed from the assessment of program interventions on the basis of policy makers' goals to an engagement with and among all stakeholders about the value and meaning of their practice. Responsive evaluators have to be extra sensitive to power relations given the deliberate attempts to acknowledge ambiguity and the plurality of interests and values and to foster genuine dialogue. The author illustrates the practice and politics of responsive evaluation with case examples from two policy fields, arts education and mental health care. In these evaluation studies, process-oriented heuristics have been developed to deal with the unequal social relations and power in responsive evaluation. As such, responsive evaluation offers an interesting example of the politics of evaluation. The emerging heuristics may be helpful to other evaluation approaches.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)31-43
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume27
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2006

Cite this

@article{0a355c4f04354f5c9884d2f4fe978fff,
title = "The practice and politics of responsive evaluation",
abstract = "Responsive evaluation offers a perspective in which evaluation is reframed from the assessment of program interventions on the basis of policy makers' goals to an engagement with and among all stakeholders about the value and meaning of their practice. Responsive evaluators have to be extra sensitive to power relations given the deliberate attempts to acknowledge ambiguity and the plurality of interests and values and to foster genuine dialogue. The author illustrates the practice and politics of responsive evaluation with case examples from two policy fields, arts education and mental health care. In these evaluation studies, process-oriented heuristics have been developed to deal with the unequal social relations and power in responsive evaluation. As such, responsive evaluation offers an interesting example of the politics of evaluation. The emerging heuristics may be helpful to other evaluation approaches.",
keywords = "Evaluation politics, Power dynamics, Responsive evaluation",
author = "Abma, {Tineke A.}",
year = "2006",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098214005283189",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "31--43",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "1",

}

The practice and politics of responsive evaluation. / Abma, Tineke A.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 27, No. 1, 01.03.2006, p. 31-43.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The practice and politics of responsive evaluation

AU - Abma, Tineke A.

PY - 2006/3/1

Y1 - 2006/3/1

N2 - Responsive evaluation offers a perspective in which evaluation is reframed from the assessment of program interventions on the basis of policy makers' goals to an engagement with and among all stakeholders about the value and meaning of their practice. Responsive evaluators have to be extra sensitive to power relations given the deliberate attempts to acknowledge ambiguity and the plurality of interests and values and to foster genuine dialogue. The author illustrates the practice and politics of responsive evaluation with case examples from two policy fields, arts education and mental health care. In these evaluation studies, process-oriented heuristics have been developed to deal with the unequal social relations and power in responsive evaluation. As such, responsive evaluation offers an interesting example of the politics of evaluation. The emerging heuristics may be helpful to other evaluation approaches.

AB - Responsive evaluation offers a perspective in which evaluation is reframed from the assessment of program interventions on the basis of policy makers' goals to an engagement with and among all stakeholders about the value and meaning of their practice. Responsive evaluators have to be extra sensitive to power relations given the deliberate attempts to acknowledge ambiguity and the plurality of interests and values and to foster genuine dialogue. The author illustrates the practice and politics of responsive evaluation with case examples from two policy fields, arts education and mental health care. In these evaluation studies, process-oriented heuristics have been developed to deal with the unequal social relations and power in responsive evaluation. As such, responsive evaluation offers an interesting example of the politics of evaluation. The emerging heuristics may be helpful to other evaluation approaches.

KW - Evaluation politics

KW - Power dynamics

KW - Responsive evaluation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33144466882&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214005283189

DO - 10.1177/1098214005283189

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 31

EP - 43

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 1

ER -